Best NBi code snippet using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased.CaseGroupingTest
CaseGroupingTest.cs
Source: CaseGroupingTest.cs
...12using System.Text;13using System.Threading.Tasks;14namespace NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased15{16 public class CaseGroupingTest17 {18 [Test]19 public void Execute_SingleColumn_TwoGroups()20 {21 var args = new ObjectsResultSetResolverArgs(new[] { new object[] { "alpha", 1 }, new object[] { "beta", 2 }, new object[] { "BETA", 3 }, new object[] { "alpha", 4 } });22 var resolver = new ObjectsResultSetResolver(args);23 var rs = resolver.Execute();24 var lowerCase = new SinglePredication(new TextLowerCase(false), new ColumnOrdinalIdentifier(0));25 var upperCase = new SinglePredication(new TextUpperCase(false), new ColumnOrdinalIdentifier(0));26 var grouping = new CaseGrouping(new IPredication[] { lowerCase, upperCase }, Context.None);27 var result = grouping.Execute(rs);28 Assert.That(result, Has.Count.EqualTo(2));29 Assert.That(result.ElementAt(0).Value.Rows, Has.Count.EqualTo(3));30 Assert.That(result.ElementAt(1).Value.Rows, Has.Count.EqualTo(1));...
CaseGroupingTest
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;2using System;3using System.Collections.Generic;4using System.Linq;5using System.Text;6using System.Threading.Tasks;7{8 {9 public void Test()10 {11 CaseGrouping caseGrouping = new CaseGrouping();
CaseGroupingTest
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;2using System;3using System.Collections.Generic;4using System.Linq;5using System.Text;6using System.Threading.Tasks;7{8 {9 public CaseGroupingTest()10 {11 CaseGrouping cg = new CaseGrouping();12 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("1", "1"));13 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("2", "2"));14 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("3", "3"));15 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("4", "4"));16 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("5", "5"));17 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("6", "6"));18 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("7", "7"));19 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("8", "8"));20 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("9", "9"));21 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("10", "10"));22 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("11", "11"));23 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("12", "12"));24 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("13", "13"));25 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("14", "14"));26 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("15", "15"));27 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("16", "16"));28 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("17", "17"));29 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("18", "18"));30 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("19", "19"));31 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("20", "20"));32 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("21", "21"));33 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("22", "22"));34 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("23", "23"));35 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("24", "24"));36 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("25", "25"));37 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("26", "26"));38 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("27", "27"));39 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("28", "28"));40 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("29", "29"));41 cg.Add(new CaseGroupingItem("30", "30
CaseGroupingTest
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;2using NUnit.Framework;3using System;4using System.Collections.Generic;5using System.Linq;6using System.Text;7using System.Threading.Tasks;8{9 {10 public void Execute_OneRowWithOneColumn_ReturnsCorrectValue()11 {12 var rows = new List<List<object>>();13 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "1" });14 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "2" });15 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "3" });16 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "4" });17 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "5" });18 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "6" });19 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "7" });20 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "8" });21 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "9" });22 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "10" });23 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "11" });24 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "12" });25 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "13" });26 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "14" });27 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "15" });28 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "16" });29 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "17" });30 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "18" });31 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "19" });32 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "20" });33 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "21" });34 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "22" });35 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "23" });36 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "24" });37 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "25" });38 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "26" });39 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "27" });40 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "28" });41 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "29" });42 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "30" });43 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "31" });44 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "32" });45 rows.Add(new List<object>() { "33" });
CaseGroupingTest
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;2var test = new CaseGroupingTest();3test.Calculate(null);4test.Calculate(null, null);5test.Calculate(null, null, null);6test.Calculate(null, null, null, null);7test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null);8test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null);9test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null);10test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);11test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);12test.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);13var test1 = new CaseGroupingTest();14test1.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);15var test2 = new CaseGroupingTest();16test2.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);17var test3 = new CaseGroupingTest();18test3.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);19var test4 = new CaseGroupingTest();20test4.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);21var test5 = new CaseGroupingTest();22test5.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);23var test6 = new CaseGroupingTest();24test6.Calculate(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null);
CaseGroupingTest
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;2using System;3using System.Collections.Generic;4using System.Linq;5using System.Text;6using System.Threading.Tasks;7using System.Data;8{9 {10 public DataTable Table { get; set; }11 public string ColumnName { get; set; }12 public bool CaseSensitive { get; set; }13 public string Sort { get; set; }14 public CaseGroupingTest()15 {16 Table = new DataTable();17 ColumnName = string.Empty;18 CaseSensitive = false;19 Sort = string.Empty;20 }21 }22}23using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;24using System;25using System.Collections.Generic;26using System.Linq;27using System.Text;28using System.Threading.Tasks;29using System.Data;30{31 {32 private CaseGroupingTest test;33 public CaseGroupingTestFactory()34 {35 test = new CaseGroupingTest();36 }37 public ITestCase Instantiate()38 {39 return test;40 }41 }42}43using NBi.Testing.Core.Calculation.Grouping.ColumnBased;44using System;45using System.Collections.Generic;46using System.Linq;47using System.Text;48using System.Threading.Tasks;49using System.Data;50{51 {52 public string ColumnName { get; set; }53 public bool CaseSensitive { get; set; }54 public string Sort { get; set; }
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
It’s strange to hear someone declare, “This can’t be tested.” In reply, I contend that everything can be tested. However, one must be pleased with the outcome of testing, which might include failure, financial loss, or personal injury. Could anything be tested when a claim is made with this understanding?
When I started writing tests with Cypress, I was always going to use the user interface to interact and change the application’s state when running tests.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
With the rise of Agile, teams have been trying to minimize the gap between the stakeholders and the development team.
So, now that the first installment of this two fold article has been published (hence you might have an idea of what Agile Testing is not in my opinion), I’ve started feeling the pressure to explain what Agile Testing actually means to me.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!