Crowdtesting is an approach for launching quality software applications by conducting extensive QA or user experience testing. Check out this guide to know more!
OVERVIEW
Crowdtesting is an approach for launching quality software applications by conducting extensive QA or user experience testing. This method involves a large group of professional testers or beta testers from around the world who use their own devices to run tests in real-world conditions.
Every software has to outshine its competitors and make users' lives easier. Apart from delivering common expectations, does a product fulfill user requirements? Is there an area of friction that can be fixed? What new trends does the product need to adapt to? This is where crowdtesting comes into the picture.
When we talk about crowdtesting on a technical level, you are using a particular software platform for conducting remote testing on digital products. This testing is performed with the help of basic crowdsourcing principles, that is, sourcing groups of people to perform research, come up with new ideas for a product, complete various tasks, and so on.
These crowd testers are carefully selected to be eligible to test software solutions in different real-world conditions. The crowds of people it uses are nearly a perfect match for your selected demographic. That's how it's able to deliver quick as well as unbiased outcomes. This goes for each development stage, on your chosen devices, and from any location or time.
Let’s start with analyzing a problem statement and how crowdtesting solves that problem.
Problem Statement:
Many mobile applications struggle with user retention because of usability issues, bugs, and a lack of compatibility across various devices and platforms. Identifying and resolving such problems efficiently ensures a positive user experience and maximizes app engagement and adoption.
Solution Using Crowdtesting:
Using crowdtesting, a comprehensive pool of testers with different operating systems, devices, and usage scenarios can successfully evaluate the app's performance and functionality. Developers can access various perspectives by outsourcing the testing process to a crowd of actual users. This helps uncover issues that may not have been obvious while testing in-house.
Overall, crowdtesting provides:
The upside is that you don't have to bear ongoing costs for maintaining an in-house team. They also offer flexible price structures according to different requirements and budgets as they offer various service levels.
Many testers can work on your project simultaneously, leading to quick test execution. Ultimately, this translates into a faster time-to-market and quicker development times without the need to build an in-house testing team from scratch.
Such people range from highly skilled testers to those with negligible knowledge of your product. The highly skilled ones would catch every little detail, whereas their newer counterparts wouldn't miss obvious problems.
Let's take a look at a few examples where crowdtesting is needed:
Test automation is far from foolproof when testing streaming content. There are various industry-specific areas it doesn't cover which only crowdtesting can handle, such as feature usage, fast forward and rewind, pausing and playing, localization and personalization of content, cross-device and cross-platform continuity, live event monitoring, seamless navigation, accessibility, and ad operations.
Here are some aspects that are analyzed during crowdtesting. Let's take a look:
The above tutorial demonstrates how to test websites in different browsers on cloud testing platforms like LambdaTest. This will help ensure software applications are free from compatibility and usability issues. Subscribe to the LambdaTest YouTube Channel for more such videos.
Crowdtesting has to be the front and center of your development strategy. Now, coming to the ‘how’ part, it takes a series of methodic steps to perform successful crowdtesting. Let's take a detailed look.
Phase I – Planning and Preparation
It's vital to have clarity In the kind of instructions, requirements, and goals that are in the picture. Your planning should include describing test environments followed by solid preparation by giving access to crucial parameters and settings. Developing unique specifications during the kickoff call for enhanced clarity is also important.
Phase II – Initiation and Configuration
It's crucial to set up different testing scenarios during the initiation and configuration stages. You also need to set up specific technical or functional configurations. As soon as everything is clear, you'll have the right testers fitting your custom requirements.
Phase III – Test Execution
Now it's finally time! Those skilled crowdtesting professionals will get to work and start testing your software product. A project manager supervises and guides testers, facilitates meeting deadlines, tracks what the QA professionals do, and gets feedback while testing.
As long as the crowdtesting organization facilitates proper management and collaboration, it will end up significantly reducing your management overhead. Figuring out flaws in your testing process won't be a pain since you'll have a single point of contact.
Phase IV – Test Results
Once the developers fix all the bugs detected, it's important to retest the product to ensure every aspect works correctly. There are always some fixes that might cause a negative impact on how other functions of a product perform. A handful of features might still fail to live up to the expected performance. Thus, it's crucial to conduct advanced testing even if the team successfully fixes bugs.
Crowdtesting requires extensive integration with test management and test reporting. That's how it makes it convenient for you to manage test execution reports. Since multiple testers are involved globally, they should ideally use highly trusted and credible tools.
Let's look at some popular crowdtesting tools that have served well in the past and continue to do so.
Now that you're done with your research and have crunched your numbers, there's a great chance that it might look like crowdtesting can be your next destination.
But before choosing a crowdtesting tool or platform, there are always some factors you must consider. Speaking of which, here is what you should look for while selecting a crowdtesting service. Let's take a look.
Comprehensive case studies and a background of high-level customer help. If they have proven data safety and product security in the past, it will help you. You’ll also be assured that your results will be confidential and your product and data will be safe and secure.
Just like every other testing method, crowdtesting does have some limitations. Let's take a look.
Depending on your approach, an organization might encounter high error rates while crowdtesting instead of having a dedicated testing team. Lack of familiarity can equate to a reduced likelihood of finding bugs.
Also, it's possible to reduce the risk of new participants repeating the same mistakes with the help of timely reporting of false positives and making them aware of the problems your previous crowd testers encountered.
If you want to make the most out of crowdtesting, it's vital to keep the following parameters in mind. Let's take a detailed look.
Once you have precise answers to such questions, it will help the crowdtesting experts develop the most appropriate solution that fulfills all your requirements. Moreover, you'll save costs, eliminate confusion, and avoid unnecessary actions that take time and effort.
This type of segmenting and identifying prospective users will help you decide on the kind of testers who can exercise the highest accuracy while acting like actual customers representing your target audience.
This can include but is not limited to, indices, bugs, numbers, and so on. You must never overlook setting deadlines, describing environments, and having a clear picture of specifications, which can be helpful for the process flow of your crowdtesting.
This way, your crowd testers can identify potential weaknesses in your software product and report any known issues. It's a simple tip to help you confirm that such issues don't occur when your users get their hands on your product.
Every successful testing cycle leverages a combination of different testing methodologies. Speaking of which, there are a few most popular testing methods testers use in combination with crowdtesting.
Let's look at a comparison and how using these alongside crowdtesting can offer some substantial benefits.
LDigital experience platforms emphasize accomplishing that goal with the help of a wide variety of tools capable of monitoring what users interact with or look at. Another example is software solutions that track mouse click locations.
It's true that crowdtesting can offer a lot of quantitative data, but it's important to keep in mind that it also provides qualitative feedback. It's possible to employ other kinds of tests, including accessibility testing, usability tests, user interviews, and direct feedback from actual users.
Typically, beta testing runs for about two weeks or so and emphasizes a greater focus on customer experience when it comes to the product. On the other hand, crowdtesting emphasizes a particular area, like checking for bugs. The testing time is much shorter, ranging from a couple of hours to a few days. This, in turn, offers results that are a lot quicker.
With crowdtesting, you can quickly bring more testers on board virtually, regardless of the location and time. You'll also have a fresh pair of eyes for your product with zero bias.
However, crowdtesting through online platforms eliminates this burden to a great extent. It also adds to conventional research methods by offering testing to become more flexible and operate in real-world conditions, taking far less time.
However, it does lack a certain level of human element. And to be fair, it's not only about making errors. That's where crowdtesting comes into the picture as a partner for test automation. Specifically, it includes real users and customers in the development phase of a product and provides them a chance to put their needs forward.
Automation testing can further be leveraged using cloud-based platforms like LambdaTest, which lets users perform manual and automation testing across different desktop and mobile web browsers online.
Note : Test Your Web and Mobile Apps on Real Devices. Try LambdaTest Now!
The basic method for documenting functional requirements involves the following:
A group of people contributes to the collective effort despite working from different locations. Since the process is online, there are fewer restrictions. Testers who are a part of crowdsourcing get paid after the completion of their work or when they validate the bug found.
One of the most popular examples of crowdsourcing is Wikipedia, which stems from the outcome of the information that various writers and editors have come up with. Isn't that what makes it one of the most comprehensive encyclopedias out there?
On the other hand, QA outsourcing is a result of the combined effort of testers who are present in the same workplace. Unlike crowdtesting scenarios, testers get paid regardless of the output generated, and several bugs discovered are validated when they work under similar conditions.
Confidentiality and Security
When developing a new application, concealing some code details from competitors is crucial. That makes confidentiality obligations a necessary point of testing and quality assurance with both crowdsourcing and outsourcing. Usually, there are non-disclosure agreements in place that restrict information access and maintain confidentiality to keep outsiders at bay.
However, the lack of extreme confidentiality can be considered a disadvantage of crowdsourcing since it involves many anonymous individuals. Even though testers might sign an NDA, they will still have access to every chunk of relevant project information, like a registered community member.
Since these testers expand globally, honoring the terms of an NDA and exercising supervision can become challenging. After all, there's no guarantee that hackers won't make their way through embedding malicious code in your software product. Worse, registered members can also have some direct competitors, which essentially nullifies the nevertheless, the monitoring has to be strict and continuous to minimize the possibility of breaches.
Management
It's proven that high-quality products result from competency in management and instructions and leveraging the power of analysis and set standards. It's no secret that maintaining coordination of work among testers and quality assurance engineers, managing test runs, and tracking test results call for specific knowledge and skills.
Quality assurance outsourcing encompasses taking care of resource management, starting from choosing the most suitable candidate for the role of a project manager capable of devoting their best efforts to get a complete grasp on your business and goals and being on high alert for potentially expensive mistakes.
However, with crowdsourcing, the requirement for management oversight is ever increasing. Instead of worrying about being more productive, you also have the crucial responsibility of managing diverse testers on a large scale. Not only that, but the results will also vary significantly from tester to tester.
Regarding time zone-related obstacles, working with a team is much easier despite a massive time zone difference. The same is not the case with having a vast pool of testers from across the globe.
Approach
One of the primary targets of testing and quality assurance is to discover exactly what customers want from a particular software product and its requirements and then test this product according to these set requirements. There are some questions every organization needs to ask themselves before releasing a product.
For instance, what is the customer's priority? What is the burning problem customers wish to solve with your product?
Here is how outsourcing makes a significant contribution.
Experience and Qualification
QA and software testing call for applying specific crucial skills and act as practice areas. Under any circumstances, any tasks related to these shouldn't be handed to unskilled workers or inexperienced rookies.
Generally, a QA team has in-depth knowledge of various software development phases and contains experts who can implement such knowledge. Whenever you're outsourcing, it's an unspoken rule that you manage to obtain highly qualified test engineers with appropriate college degrees or specialties.
For instance, they can easily replicate complex and critical bugs, which indicates that QA engineers have a deeper understanding of how a defect might occur, the circumstances leading to it, and the steps they can take to find it.
On the other hand, a crowd tester gets paid for each bug defined, regardless of how complex or critical it is. In some cases, they might lack the motivation to look closely.
Costs
Depending on a wide variety of factors, the cost of crowdsourcing and outsourcing QA services can vary. Some factors include the service provider, location, project complexity, and expertise level required.
When you outsource QA services, the cost usually depends on the vendor's project-based fee or their hourly rate. The hourly rate usually depends on the location and expertise of the vendor. As far as we are discussing project-based fees, the cost depends on project scope, number of testers, and project duration.
When you crowdsource QA services, it can turn out to be a lot less expensive as compared to outsourcing. The reason is you have access to a Large pool of testers across the globe willing to work at competitive rates. Of course, crowdsourcing costs also depend on project duration, complexity, and number of testers needed. Total costs can vary from a couple of hundred dollars to a few thousands depending on the scope and size of a project. It's a striking contrast to outsourcing.
Due to the similarities between crowdtesting and outsourcing, one might feel that they are more or less the same. So, is crowdtesting just outsourcing? Well, yes and no. Crowdtesting is another term for crowdsourced testing, which is also a kind of outsourced testing, but there are some key differences.
Let's draw a quick comparison between the two:
Aspect | Crowdtesting | Outsourcing |
---|---|---|
Management | Coordinated by a manager on a secure platform over the Internet. | Managed by a representative, conducted in a specific premises or building. |
Ownership of Tools/Devices | Testers own and operate all operating systems and devices. | Either the organization loans tools/devices or outsourced testers own them. |
Number of Testers | Almost unlimited number of testers at various experience and skill levels. | Set the number of testers with specific expertise. |
Scalability and Agility | Highly scalable and Agile. | Less scalable compared to crowdtesting. |
Setup Flexibility | More flexible and budget-friendly, resulting in quicker results. | Higher costs and increased upfront work are needed for setup. |
Bias Removal | Helps remove biases due to a diverse crowd individually testing the software product. | Susceptible to biases similar to in-house teams. |
Overall Value and Test Coverage | Offers maximum value and test coverage due to diverse and numerous testers. | Provides value with specialized expertise, but less diverse in terms of tester backgrounds. |
Crowdtesting is one of the fastest, most cost-effective, and most reliable methods to test the quality of a product and make it free of bugs. It's a unique methodology to leverage the expertise of consultants, professionals, and some skilled users to test different applications under precise real-world environments.
Testing an application or any digital product from the end user's perspective is a surefire way to build successful digital products. And with an actual crowd under various real-world scenarios is the best way to go at it!
On this page
Did you find this page helpful?
Try LambdaTest Now !!
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!