List of Classes and Methods of com.testsigma.security package of Testsigma Framework

Most test automation tools just do test execution automation. Without test design involved in the whole test automation process, the test cases remain ad hoc and detect only simple bugs. This solution is just automation without real testing. In addition, test execution automation is very inefficient.

Development practices are constantly changing and as testers, we need to embrace change. One of the changes that we can experience is the move from monthly or quarterly releases to continuous delivery or continuous deployment. This move to continuous delivery or deployment offers testers the chance to learn new skills.

Entering the world of testers, one question started to formulate in my mind: “what is the reason that bugs happen?”.

Let’s put it short: Appium Desktop = Appium Server + Inspector. When Appium Server runs automation test scripts, Appium Inspector can identify the UI elements of every application under test. The core structure of an Appium Inspector is to ensure that you discover every visible app element when you develop your test scripts. Before you kickstart your journey with Appium Inspector, you need to understand the details of it.

In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.