Best Testng code snippet using org.testng.asserts.Interface IAssert.getExpected
Source:IAssert.java
2public interface IAssert<T> {3 String getMessage();4 void doAssert();5 T getActual();6 T getExpected();7}...
getExpected
Using AI Code Generation
1 public void getExpected() {2 IAssert myAssert = new IAssert() {3 public void doAssert() {4 }5 public Object getExpected() {6 return "expected";7 }8 public Object getActual() {9 return "actual";10 }11 };12 Assert.assertEquals(myAssert.getExpected(), "expected");13 }14}15I am trying to use the method getActual() of IAssert interface in my testng test but I am getting the following error:16java.lang.AbstractMethodError: org.testng.asserts.IAssert.getActual()Ljava/lang/Object;17public class Test implements IAssert {18 public void doAssert() {19 }20 public Object getExpected() {21 return "expected";22 }23 public Object getActual() {24 return "actual";25 }26 public static void main(String[] args) {27 Test test = new Test();28 Assert.assertEquals(test.getActual(), "actual");29 }30}
getExpected
Using AI Code Generation
1public class TestNGAsserts {2 public void testAssertEquals() {3 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");4 }5}6public class TestNGAsserts {7 public void testAssertEquals() {8 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");9 }10}11public class TestNGAsserts {12 public void testAssertEquals() {13 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");14 }15}16public class TestNGAsserts {17 public void testAssertEquals() {18 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");19 }20}21public class TestNGAsserts {22 public void testAssertEquals() {23 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");24 }25}26public class TestNGAsserts {27 public void testAssertEquals() {28 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");29 }30}31public class TestNGAsserts {32 public void testAssertEquals() {33 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");34 }35}36public class TestNGAsserts {37 public void testAssertEquals() {38 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");39 }40}41public class TestNGAsserts {42 public void testAssertEquals() {43 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");44 }45}46public class TestNGAsserts {47 public void testAssertEquals() {48 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");49 }50}51public class TestNGAsserts {52 public void testAssertEquals()
getExpected
Using AI Code Generation
1package testng;2import org.testng.Assert;3import org.testng.annotations.Test;4public class TestNGInterfaceIAssert {5 public void testIAssert() {6 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");7 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");8 Assert.assertEquals("Hello", "Hello");9 }10}
getExpected
Using AI Code Generation
1class Test {2 public function test() {3 var assert = new org.testng.asserts.Assert();4 assert.getExpected(1, 2);5 }6}
getExpected
Using AI Code Generation
1package org.testng.asserts;2import org.testng.ITestNGListener;3import org.testng.ITestResult;4import org.testng.Assert;5import org.testng.annotations.Test;6import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;7import org.testng.annotations.Listeners;8import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;9import org.testng.annotations.AfterClass;10public class InterfaceIAssertTest {11 public void f() {12 Assert.assertEquals("TestNG", "TestNG");13 }14}15package org.testng.asserts;16import org.testng.ITestNGListener;17import org.testng.ITestResult;18import org.testng.Assert;19import org.testng.annotations.Test;20import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;21import org.testng.annotations.Listeners;22import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;23import org.testng.annotations.AfterClass;24public class InterfaceIAssertTest {25 public void f() {26 Assert.assertEquals("TestNG", "TestNG");27 }28}29package org.testng.asserts;30import org.testng.ITestNGListener;31import org.testng.ITestResult;32import org.testng.Assert;33import org.testng.annotations.Test;34import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;35import org.testng.annotations.Listeners;36import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;37import org.testng.annotations.AfterClass;38public class InterfaceIAssertTest {39 public void f() {40 Assert.assertEquals("TestNG", "TestNG");41 }42}43package org.testng.asserts;44import org.testng.ITestNGListener;45import org.testng.ITestResult;46import org.testng.Assert;47import org.testng.annotations.Test;48import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;49import org.testng.annotations.Listeners;50import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;51import org.testng.annotations.AfterClass;52public class InterfaceIAssertTest {53 public void f() {54 Assert.assertEquals("TestNG", "TestNG");55 }56}57package org.testng.asserts;58import org.testng.ITestNGListener;59import org.testng.ITestResult;60import org.testng.Assert;61import org.testng.annotations.Test;62import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;63import org.testng.annotations.Listeners;64import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;65import org.testng.annotations
Setting Jenkins multijob build result with Groovy script based on % pass/fail child jobs
TestNG AssertEquals double - good number to put for a double?
Character encoding issues in Eclipse for Java using Webdriver
How do I mock Spring ApplicationContext's getBean method using Mockito for writing unit tests with TestNG?
Why are empty collections of different type equal?
How to run JUnit 5 and JUnit 4 test suites in Gradle?
Running Cucumber project using Main.run from another main method
How to screencast automated tests using Java?
TestNG : @Parameters does not work
IDEA 10.5 Command line is too long
Not sure if this really qualifies as an answer. Might be more of a comment but comments do not really lend themselves to long code snippets so here goes.
To make your code a tad more readable and easier to grok I did the following:
build.getResult()
becomes build.result
log('ERROR: ${e.getMessage()}')
becomes log 'ERROR: ${e.getMessage()}'
log 'ERROR: ${e.message}'
becomes log "ERROR: ${e.message}"
subJob = ...
becomes def subJob = ...
. Declaring everything in the global scope leads to hard-to-find issues, especially if you are re-using variable names like job
.I also cleaned out some reduncancies, an example:
job.getLastBuild().getSubBuilds().each { subBuild->
subJob = subBuild.getJobName()
subJobNumber = subBuild.getBuildNumber()
job = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName()) // <---
...
//println subBuild
dePhaseJob = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName()) // <---
dePhaseJobBuild = dePhaseJob.getBuildByNumber(subBuild.getBuildNumber())
so here we set both job
and dePhaseJob
to the same value. Assigning the same value to two separate variables like this is redundant and only makes the code harder to read.
Furthermore (and I'm not intimately familiar with the jenkins internal apis so I might be wrong here) the following flow in the above code seems off:
subBuild
instancejob
and dePhaseJob
dePhaseJobBuild
using dePHaseJob.getBuildByNumber(subBuild.buildNumer)
but doesn't that leave us with subBuild == dePhaseJobBuild
? I.e. we spent all this code just to retrieve a value we already had. We go from build to job and back to build. Unless I'm missing something esoteric in the jenkins apis this seems redunant as well.
With all those changes and a few other minor ones we und up with the following code:
def job(name) {
hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(name)
}
def aggregateResults() {
def mainJobName = manager.build.project.name
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log 'Aggregated status report'
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log "${mainJobName} #${manager.build.number} - ${manager.build.result}"
def failed = false
job(mainJobName).lastBuild.subBuilds.each { subBuild ->
log "${subBuild.jobName} #${subBuild.buildNumber} - ${subBuild.result}"
log subBuild.log
subBuild.subBuilds.each { subSubBuild ->
try {
log " ${subSubBuild.jobName} #${subSubBuild.buildNumber} - ${subSubBuild.result}"
log " " + subSubBuild.getLog(Integer.MAX_VALUE).join("\n ") //indent the log lines
if(!failed && subSubBuild.result.isWorseThan(threshold)) {
failed = true
}
} catch (Exception e) {
log "ERROR: ${e.message}"
failed = true
}
}
}
if(failed) {
manager.build.result = hudson.model.Result.FAILURE
}
}
and again, I don't have a jenkins instance to test this on so I'm flying in the dark here and apologize in advance for misspellings, syntax fumbles or other abuse of the code and the jenkins apis.
The issues in your code (like the string interpolation one which I can't see ever having worked) makes me think that the original code was not working but rather an example pattern.
This makes me further wonder if you really need to do two levels of nesting here, i.e. is the following:
job(mainJobName).lastBuild.subBuilds.each { subBuild ->
subBuild.subBuilds.each { subSubBuild ->
...
}
}
really necessary or would one level be enough? From the quick graph in your question it would seem that we only need to care about the main job and its sub jobs, not sub-sub jobs.
If this is the case, you could get away with logic along the lines of:
def aggregateResults() {
def mainJob = job(manager.build.project.name)
def subs = mainJob.lastBuild.subBuilds
def total = subs.size()
def failed = subs.findAll { sub -> sub.result.isWorseThan(threshold) }.size()
if(failed > 0) {
manager.build.result = hudson.model.Result.FAILURE
}
failed == 0 ? "green" : (failed/total < 0.25 ? "yellow" : "red")
}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Desired Capabilities is a class used to declare a set of basic requirements such as combinations of browsers, operating systems, browser versions, etc. to perform automated cross browser testing of a web application.
Softwares have become an inseparable part of our daily lives. The world demands intuitive, authentic and dependable technology, and in a rapidly growing market-place, even small negligence might result insomething disastrous. Software needs to be tested for bugs and to ensure the product meets the requirements and produces the desired results. Testing ensures premier user experience by eliminating weaknesses in software development. To be able to build high-quality scalable software, one has to think like a software tester.
This article is a part of our Content Hub. For more in-depth resources, check out our content hub on Selenium Python Tutorial and Selenium pytest Tutorial.
This article is a part of our Content Hub. For more in-depth resources, check out our content hub on Automation Testing Tutorial.
Automation testing at first may sound like a nightmare especially when you have been into the manual testing business for quite long. Looking at the pace with which the need for automation testing is arising, it has become inevitable for website testers to deep dive into the automation river and starts swimming. To become a pro swimmer it takes time, similar is the case with becoming a successful automation tester. It requires knowledge & deep understanding of numerous automation tools & frameworks. As a beginner in automation testing, you may be looking forward to grabbing your hands on an open-source testing framework. After doing so the question that arises is what next? How do I go about using the open-source tool, framework, or platform, & I am here to help you out in that regard. Today, we will be looking at one of the most renowned open-source automation testing frameworks known as Selenium. In this Selenium Java tutorial, I will demonstrate a Selenium login example with Java to help you automate the login process.
TestNG is a Java-based open-source framework for test automation that includes various test types, such as unit testing, functional testing, E2E testing, etc. TestNG is in many ways similar to JUnit and NUnit. But in contrast to its competitors, its extensive features make it a lot more reliable framework. One of the major reasons for its popularity is its ability to structure tests and improve the scripts' readability and maintainability. Another reason can be the important characteristics like the convenience of using multiple annotations, reliance, and priority that make this framework popular among developers and testers for test design. You can refer to the TestNG tutorial to learn why you should choose the TestNG framework.
You can push your abilities to do automated testing using TestNG and advance your career by earning a TestNG certification. Check out our TestNG certification.
Watch this complete tutorial to learn how you can leverage the capabilities of the TestNG framework for Selenium automation testing.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!