Best Powermock code snippet using org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.doInvokeMethod
Source: WhiteboxImpl.java
...540 * @throws Throwable541 */542 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")543 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object tested, Object... arguments) throws Exception {544 return (T) doInvokeMethod(tested, null, null, arguments);545 }546 /**547 * Invoke a private or inner class method without the need to specify the548 * method name. This is thus a more refactor friendly version of the549 * {@link #invokeMethod(Object, String, Object...)} method and is recommend550 * over this method for that reason. This method might be useful to test551 * private methods.552 */553 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")554 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Class<?> tested, Object... arguments) throws Exception {555 return (T) doInvokeMethod(tested, null, null, arguments);556 }557 /**558 * Invoke a private or inner class method. This might be useful to test559 * private methods.560 * 561 * @throws Throwable562 */563 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")564 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object tested, String methodToExecute, Object... arguments) throws Exception {565 return (T) doInvokeMethod(tested, null, methodToExecute, arguments);566 }567 /**568 * Invoke a private or inner class method in cases where power mock cannot569 * automatically determine the type of the parameters, for example when570 * mixing primitive types and wrapper types in the same method. For most571 * situations use {@link #invokeMethod(Class, String, Object...)} instead.572 * 573 * @throws Exception574 * Exception that may occur when invoking this method.575 */576 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")577 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object tested, String methodToExecute, Class<?>[] argumentTypes, Object... arguments)578 throws Exception {579 final Class<?> unmockedType = getType(tested);580 Method method = getMethod(unmockedType, methodToExecute, argumentTypes);581 if (method == null) {582 throwExceptionIfMethodWasNotFound(unmockedType, methodToExecute, null, arguments);583 }584 return (T) performMethodInvocation(tested, method, arguments);585 }586 /**587 * Invoke a private or inner class method in a subclass (defined by588 * <code>definedIn</code>) in cases where power mock cannot automatically589 * determine the type of the parameters, for example when mixing primitive590 * types and wrapper types in the same method. For most situations use591 * {@link #invokeMethod(Class, String, Object...)} instead.592 * 593 * @throws Exception594 * Exception that may occur when invoking this method.595 */596 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")597 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object tested, String methodToExecute, Class<?> definedIn, Class<?>[] argumentTypes,598 Object... arguments) throws Exception {599 Method method = getMethod(definedIn, methodToExecute, argumentTypes);600 if (method == null) {601 throwExceptionIfMethodWasNotFound(definedIn, methodToExecute, null, arguments);602 }603 return (T) performMethodInvocation(tested, method, arguments);604 }605 /**606 * Invoke a private or inner class method in that is located in a subclass607 * of the tested instance. This might be useful to test private methods.608 * 609 * @throws Exception610 * Exception that may occur when invoking this method.611 */612 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")613 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object tested, Class<?> declaringClass, String methodToExecute, Object... arguments)614 throws Exception {615 return (T) doInvokeMethod(tested, declaringClass, methodToExecute, arguments);616 }617 /**618 * Invoke a private method in that is located in a subclass of an instance.619 * This might be useful to test overloaded private methods.620 * <p>621 * Use this for overloaded methods only, if possible use622 * {@link #invokeMethod(Object, Object...)} or623 * {@link #invokeMethod(Object, String, Object...)} instead.624 * 625 * @throws Exception626 * Exception that may occur when invoking this method.627 */628 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")629 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Object object, Class<?> declaringClass, String methodToExecute, Class<?>[] parameterTypes,630 Object... arguments) throws Exception {631 if (object == null) {632 throw new IllegalArgumentException("object cannot be null");633 }634 final Method methodToInvoke = getMethod(declaringClass, methodToExecute, parameterTypes);635 // Invoke method636 return (T) performMethodInvocation(object, methodToInvoke, arguments);637 }638 /**639 * Invoke a private or inner class method. This might be useful to test640 * private methods.641 * 642 */643 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")644 public static synchronized <T> T invokeMethod(Class<?> clazz, String methodToExecute, Object... arguments) throws Exception {645 return (T) doInvokeMethod(clazz, null, methodToExecute, arguments);646 }647 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")648 private static <T> T doInvokeMethod(Object tested, Class<?> declaringClass, String methodToExecute, Object... arguments) throws Exception {649 Method methodToInvoke = findMethodOrThrowException(tested, declaringClass, methodToExecute, arguments);650 // Invoke test651 return (T) performMethodInvocation(tested, methodToInvoke, arguments);652 }653 /**654 * Finds and returns a certain method. If the method couldn't be found this655 * method delegates to656 * {@link WhiteboxImpl#throwExceptionIfMethodWasNotFound(Object, String, Method, Object...)}657 * .658 * 659 * @param tested660 * The instance or class containing the method.661 * @param declaringClass662 * The class where the method is supposed to be declared (may be...
doInvokeMethod
Using AI Code Generation
1package org.powermock.examples.mockito;2import org.junit.Test;3import org.junit.runner.RunWith;4import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;5import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;6import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;7import java.io.File;8import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;9import static org.mockito.Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions;10import static org.mockito.Mockito.verifyZeroInteractions;11import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.doInvokeMethod;12import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.doReturn;13import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.mock;14import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.verifyPrivate;15import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.verifyStatic;16import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.when;17import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.whenNew;18@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)19@PrepareForTest({File.class, FileUtils.class})20public class FileUtilsTest {21 public void testGetFileExtension() throws Exception {22 File file = mock(File.class);23 doReturn("test").when(file).getName();24 doReturn("txt").when(file).getExtension();25 String extension = FileUtils.getFileExtension(file);26 verify(file).getName();27 verify(file).getExtension();28 verifyNoMoreInteractions(file);29 }
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Most test automation tools just do test execution automation. Without test design involved in the whole test automation process, the test cases remain ad hoc and detect only simple bugs. This solution is just automation without real testing. In addition, test execution automation is very inefficient.
Many theoretical descriptions explain the role of the Scrum Master as a vital member of the Scrum team. However, these descriptions do not provide an honest answer to the fundamental question: “What are the day-to-day activities of a Scrum Master?”
The rapid shift in the use of technology has impacted testing and quality assurance significantly, especially around the cloud adoption of agile development methodologies. With this, the increasing importance of quality and automation testing has risen enough to deliver quality work.
As part of one of my consulting efforts, I worked with a mid-sized company that was looking to move toward a more agile manner of developing software. As with any shift in work style, there is some bewilderment and, for some, considerable anxiety. People are being challenged to leave their comfort zones and embrace a continuously changing, dynamic working environment. And, dare I say it, testing may be the most ‘disturbed’ of the software roles in agile development.
One of the essential parts when performing automated UI testing, whether using Selenium or another framework, is identifying the correct web elements the tests will interact with. However, if the web elements are not located correctly, you might get NoSuchElementException in Selenium. This would cause a false negative result because we won’t get to the actual functionality check. Instead, our test will fail simply because it failed to interact with the correct element.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!