Discover AI-native insights at Testμ Conference‘25

How to use createNewInvocationControl method of org.powermock.api.mockito.expectation.DefaultConstructorExpectationSetup class

Best Powermock code snippet using org.powermock.api.mockito.expectation.DefaultConstructorExpectationSetup.createNewInvocationControl

Source: DefaultConstructorExpectationSetup.java

...62        } else {63            WhiteboxImpl.getConstructor(unmockedType, parameterTypes);64        }65        66        NewInvocationControl<OngoingStubbing<T>> newInvocationControl = createNewInvocationControl(type, unmockedType);67        68        return newInvocationControl.expectSubstitutionLogic(arguments);69    }70    71    private NewInvocationControl<OngoingStubbing<T>> createNewInvocationControl(final Class<T> type, final Class<T> unmockedType) {72        /*73        * Check if this type has been mocked before74        */75        NewInvocationControl<OngoingStubbing<T>> newInvocationControl =76            (NewInvocationControl<OngoingStubbing<T>>) MockRepository.getNewInstanceControl(unmockedType);77        if (newInvocationControl == null) {78            newInvocationControl = createNewInvocationControl(mock);79            MockRepository.putNewInstanceControl(type, newInvocationControl);80            MockRepository.addObjectsToAutomaticallyReplayAndVerify(WhiteboxImpl.getOriginalUnmockedType(type));81        }82        return newInvocationControl;83    }84    85    @Override86    public OngoingStubbing<T> withAnyArguments() throws Exception {87        if (mockType == null) {88            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Class to expected cannot be null");89        }90        final Class<T> unmockedType = (Class<T>) WhiteboxImpl.getOriginalUnmockedType(mockType);91        final Constructor<?>[] allConstructors = WhiteboxImpl.getAllConstructors(unmockedType);92        final Constructor<?> constructor = allConstructors[0];93        final Class<?>[] parameterTypes = constructor.getParameterTypes();94        Object[] paramArgs = new Object[parameterTypes.length];95        for (int i = 0; i < parameterTypes.length; i++) {96            Class<?> paramType = parameterTypes[i];97            paramArgs[i] = createParamArgMatcher(paramType);98        }99        Constructor<?>[] otherCtors = new Constructor<?>[allConstructors.length - 1];100        System.arraycopy(allConstructors, 1, otherCtors, 0, allConstructors.length - 1);101        102        final OngoingStubbing<T> ongoingStubbing = createNewSubstituteMock(mockType, parameterTypes, paramArgs);103        return new DelegatingToConstructorsOngoingStubbing<T>(otherCtors, ongoingStubbing);104    }105    106    private Object createParamArgMatcher(Class<?> paramType) {107        return ArgumentMatchers.nullable(paramType);108    }109    110    @Override111    public OngoingStubbing<T> withNoArguments() throws Exception {112        return createNewSubstituteMock(mockType, parameterTypes);113    }114    115    @Override116    public WithExpectedArguments<T> withParameterTypes(Class<?> parameterType, Class<?>... additionalParameterTypes) {117        this.parameterTypes = arrayMerger.mergeArrays(Class.class, new Class<?>[]{parameterType}, additionalParameterTypes);118        return this;119    }120    121    private DefaultMockCreator getMockCreator() {return mockCreator;}122    123    private NewInvocationControl<OngoingStubbing<T>> createNewInvocationControl(InvocationSubstitute<T> mock) {124        return new MockitoNewInvocationControl<T>(mock);125    }126    127    void setParameterTypes(Class<?>[] parameterTypes) {128        this.parameterTypes = parameterTypes;129    }130}...

createNewInvocationControl

Using AI Code Generation

1InvocationControl control = DefaultConstructorExpectationSetup.createNewInvocationControl();2control.expectToBeCalled();3new ClassUnderTest();4control.verify();5control.expectToBeCalled().andThrow(new Exception());6new ClassUnderTest();7control.verify();8control.expectToBeCalled().andAnswer(new IAnswer<Object>() {9    public Object answer() throws Throwable {10        return new ClassUnderTest();11    }12});13new ClassUnderTest();14control.verify();15control.expectToBeCalled().andDelegateTo(new ClassUnderTest());16new ClassUnderTest();17control.verify();18control.expectToBeCalled().andCallRealMethod();19new ClassUnderTest();20control.verify();21control.expectToBeCalled().andDoNothing();22new ClassUnderTest();23control.verify();24control.expectToBeCalled().andReturn(null);25new ClassUnderTest();26control.verify();27control.expectToBeCalled().andCallRealMethod();28new ClassUnderTest();29control.verify();30control.expectToBeCalled().andReturnValue(null);31new ClassUnderTest();32control.verify();33control.expectToBeCalled().andThrow(new Exception());

Blogs

Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:

[LambdaTest Spartans Panel Discussion]: What Changed For Testing & QA Community And What Lies Ahead

The rapid shift in the use of technology has impacted testing and quality assurance significantly, especially around the cloud adoption of agile development methodologies. With this, the increasing importance of quality and automation testing has risen enough to deliver quality work.

Complete Guide To Styling Forms With CSS Accent Color

The web paradigm has changed considerably over the last few years. Web 2.0, a term coined way back in 1999, was one of the pivotal moments in the history of the Internet. UGC (User Generated Content), ease of use, and interoperability for the end-users were the key pillars of Web 2.0. Consumers who were only consuming content up till now started creating different forms of content (e.g., text, audio, video, etc.).

Introducing LambdaTest Analytics: Test Reporting Made Awesome ????

Collecting and examining data from multiple sources can be a tedious process. The digital world is constantly evolving. To stay competitive in this fast-paced environment, businesses must frequently test their products and services. While it’s easy to collect raw data from multiple sources, it’s far more complex to interpret it properly.

Test strategy and how to communicate it

I routinely come across test strategy documents when working with customers. They are lengthy—100 pages or more—and packed with monotonous text that is routinely reused from one project to another. Yawn once more— the test halt and resume circumstances, the defect management procedure, entrance and exit criteria, unnecessary generic risks, and in fact, one often-used model replicates the requirements of textbook testing, from stress to systems integration.

Getting Rid of Technical Debt in Agile Projects

Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.