How to use shouldFailOnLastMethodBecauseOneInvocationWanted method of org.mockitousage.verification.BasicVerificationInOrderTest class

Why it didn't work

You're mocking Result.iterator():

when(deviceDataResultMock.iterator()).thenReturn(resultIterator);

But you didn't mock Result.spliterator(), or at least I didn't see it, which is what's being called by Result.stream(), which is just Collection.stream():

default Stream<E> stream() {
    return StreamSupport.stream(spliterator(), false);
}

So, you'll have to mock the spliterator() method as well, and probably a few others, too! Alternatively, tell Mockito to call default methods:

Can you make mockito (1.10.17) work with default methods in interfaces?

A comment on mocking in general

I'm not convinced that mocking the jOOQ API is a very good idea. The jOOQ API is vast, and you'll likely forget to mock this or that method as this question here has aptly shown. With your current setup, you're planning on updating your mock every time you project a new column? E.g. you're doing this:

when(recordMock.get(DEVICEID.getName()).thenReturn(deviceId);

What if the column is renamed? Or another column is projected? You'll have to update this test. That feels like quite the chore, and it's very error prone.

While jOOQ itself has JDBC mocking capabilities, please consider the bold disclaimer on that manual page:

Disclaimer: The general idea of mocking a JDBC connection with this jOOQ API is to provide quick workarounds, injection points, etc. using a very simple JDBC abstraction. It is NOT RECOMMENDED to emulate an entire database (including complex state transitions, transactions, locking, etc.) using this mock API. Once you have this requirement, please consider using an actual database product instead for integration testing, rather than implementing your test database inside of a MockDataProvider

When working with databases, it's usually best to resort to running integration tests, see the following resources for some details:

• Integration testing with Jooq
• Using H2 as a Test Database Product with jOOQ
• How to Integration Test Stored Procedures with jOOQ
• Using Testcontainers to Generate jOOQ Code

Of course, you can write a few smoke tests to ensure jOOQ works correctly if you don't trust jOOQ (jOOQ being an external dependency). But the jOOQ unit and integration tests are vast, so in general, you should be able to trust core types like Result or Record to do the right thing for you. What you really want to test is your query correctness, and that, you can only integration test against an actual database instance.

Nutshell: Can't always use when to stub spies; use doReturn.

Assuming static imports of spy and doReturn (both PowerMockito):

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(B.class)
public class BTest {
    @Test public void testClass() throws Exception {
        B b = spy(new B());
        doReturn(42).when(b, "m");
        b.asd();
    }
}

You could also @PrepareForTest(A.class) and set up the doReturn on when(a, "m"). Which makes more sense depends on the actual test.

This is a long time ago question, but here is how i did it, using Mockito spy, create a method which call the parent method in the child class:

public class Child extends Parent {
    /**
     * Shouldn't invoke protected Parent.print() of parent class.
     */
    @Override
    protected String print() {
        // some additional behavior
    return callParent();
    }

    protected callParent()
    {
      super.print();
    }

}

And in the test :

@Test
public void sould_mock_invocation_of_protected_method_of_parent_class() throws Exception {

    // Given
    Child child = Mockito.spy(new Child());
    Mockito.doReturn(null)
           .when(child)
           .callParent();
    // When
    String retrieved = child.print();

    // Then
    Mockito.verify(child, times(1)).callParent(); // verification of child method
    Assert.assertEquals(retrieved, "abc");
}

Note: this test only check we call the parent method in the child class

As stated in the offical documentation, it is possible and sometimes even advised:

Important gotcha on spying real objects!

Sometimes it's impossible or impractical to use when(Object) for stubbing spies. Therefore when using spies please consider doReturn|Answer|Throw() family of methods for stubbing.

But, once again as the doc states:

Stubbing voids requires different approach from when(Object) because the compiler does not like void methods inside brackets...

Is your method void?

Example from the documentation if void:

doAnswer(new Answer() {
    public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
        Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
        Mock mock = invocation.getMock();
        return null;
    }
}).when(mock).someMethod();

Thus, you should use the following code if your method is void:

MyObject spy = spy(myObject);

doAnswer(new Answer<Object>() {
    @Override
    public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
        return null;
    }
}).when(spy).notify();   

Or if it is not void:

when(spy.toString()).thenAnswer(new Answer<String>() {
    @Override
    public String answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
        return "this";
    }
});

Caused by: org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: Checked exception is invalid for this method! Invalid: java.net.ConnectException: Test exception

As stated by the exception message (and told in comments), you have to throw a RestClientException, not a ConnectException:

Mockito.when(restOperations.exchange(
        Mockito.anyString(), Mockito.<HttpMethod>any(), Mockito.<HttpEntity<?>>any(),
        Mockito.<Class<UserByRoleHolder>>any())).thenThrow(new RestClientException("Test exception"));

You get this error message, because the method exchange declares no thrown exception and ConnectException is a checked exception (i.e. must be declared when thrown).

With mockito 2.x, JDK 8 default methods are supported.

With mockito 1.x it's not possible,

Old answer

Unfortunately it's not yet possible (mockito 1.10.19), from the README.md on the github'page

JDK8 status

Mockito should work fine with JDK8 if you stay away from default methods (aka defender methods). Lambda usage may work just as good for Answers. We're unsure about every JDK8 features at the moment, like serializing a mock that uses a lambda. Error report and pull request are welcome though (contributing guide).

EDIT 1: defender methods and default methods are different names for the same thing.

I hope for a mockmaker replacement that will handle java 8 opcodes properly for such cases as some opcodes have a different semantic in Java 8.

EDIT 2: Updated the mockito readme, and this quote accordingly

Just to complete the picture:

The latest version of Mockito 2 very well supports mocking of final classes. But you have to explicitly enable this new experimental feature first!

( see here on how to do that - it boils down to add a file mockito-extensions/org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker to your classpath, containing the value mock-maker-inline )

But of course: you only mock something if you have to. Your desire to mock Enum instances is most likely driven by either not understanding that - or because you created hard to test code here. In that sense the real answer would be to look into ways that avoid this kind of mocking in the first place.

In that case, the class are not load belongs to javax.security, thus you should ignore "javax.security.*" in @PowerMockIgnore. It works.

In my case

Having test code what contained jsonPath usage:

 mockMvc.perform(get("/api/userDetails").header("Authorization", base64ForTestUser).accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
                .andExpect(status().isOk())
                .andDo(print())
                .andExpect(jsonPath("userName").value("testUser"));

I was getting

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/jayway/jsonpath/InvalidPathException

and

java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.jayway.jsonpath.InvalidPathException

This error was directly caused by lack of such dependencies

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.jayway.jsonpath</groupId>
    <artifactId>json-path-assert</artifactId>
    <version>0.8.1</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>