How to use shouldFailIfMethodWasInvokedButWithDifferentArguments method of org.mockitousage.verification.BasicVerificationInOrderTest class

First, create a ResponseEntity object:

HttpHeaders header = new HttpHeaders();
header.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON);

ResponseEntity<?> responseEntity = new ResponseEntity<>(
    "some response body",
    header, 
    HttpStatus.OK
);

Then build a mock to return the responseEntity object:

when(restC.SomeMethod(client)).thenReturn(responseEntity);

Point to pay attention:

Avoid to use ResponseEntity inside @Service class. You should use ResponseEntity in @RestController class.

And you can Inject your @Service class using @Autowired annotation, like:

@RestController
public class YourControllerClass {

    @Autowired
    private YourServiceClass yourServiceClass;

Or using constructor, like:

@RestController
public class YourControllerClass {

    private YourServiceClass yourServiceClass;

    public YourControllerClass(YourServiceClass yourServiceClass) {
        this.yourServiceClass= yourServiceClass;
    }

So:

@Service class will handle business or data objects and @RestController class will handle Response and Request objects. Thus we have Single Responsibility principle.

Some nice links:

• Spring MVC - Using RequestEntity and ResponseEntity
• How do I mock a REST template
• Building REST services with Spring
• Understanding the Single Responsibility Principle

Hope this helps!

If isSkipped() is not a final method, this problem probably indicates that you try to stub a method while stubbing of another method is in progress. It's not supported because Mockito relies on order of method invocations (when(), etc) in its stubbing API.

I guess you have something like this in your test method:

when(...).thenReturn(getSkippedBuild());

If so, you need to rewrite it as follows:

DynamicBuild build = getSkippedBuild();
when(...).thenReturn(build);

You may want to try mockito. The test works like this:

You use mockito to "implement" EntityManager. Instead of the real code, you use the methods of mockito to say "if the application calls getReference(), then return this object". In the background, mockito will create a proxy instance which intercepts the Java method calls and returns the values which you specify. Calls to other methods will return null.

Mocking things like createQuery() works the same way but you first need to create a mockup of Query and then use the same approach as in getReference() (return the query mockup).

Since you don't use a real EM, you don't need a real persistence.xml.

A much more simple solution would be if you could set some property to change the name of the persistence.xml file but I don't think that this is possible.

Some other links that may help:

• How to configure JPA for testing in Maven
• Suggest a JPA Unit test framework

Try View -> Tool Windows -> Maven projects, then click the blue icon in the top left of the tool window (Reimport all Maven projects). You should be able to find the dependencies in the project view, under external libraries.

If this does not work, there is probably something wrong with your maven config (pom.xml). Try mvn clean install from the command line see if it gives any errors.

OK, this is a bad thing to be doing. Don't mock a list; instead, mock the individual objects inside the list. See Mockito: mocking an arraylist that will be looped in a for loop for how to do this.

Also, why are you using PowerMock? You don't seem to be doing anything that requires PowerMock.

But the real cause of your problem is that you are using when on two different objects, before you complete the stubbing. When you call when, and provide the method call that you are trying to stub, then the very next thing you do in either Mockito OR PowerMock is to specify what happens when that method is called - that is, to do the thenReturn part. Each call to when must be followed by one and only one call to thenReturn, before you do any more calls to when. You made two calls to when without calling thenReturn - that's your error.

Wiremock provides a simulator for HTTP-based APIs while Mockito provides the mock implementation of the method/object.

If we are using Mockito to mock HTTP-based method, it means we are trying to return the object/response without testing any code to invoke REST service, getting HTTP response and deserializing the same.

If we use the Wiremock, we will able to test close to reality as it will test invocation of REST call as well as deserialization of the response.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-difference-between-stub-mock-virtual-service-wojciech-bulaty/ is one good article to read, of course not by me :-)

There are several disadvantages to the when/thenReturn, when/thenThrow and when/then syntaxes. For example,

• In the case of when/thenReturn, if the return type is a generic with a wildcard, and you wish to return a mock of the same type, you will be unable to avoid a compile warning.
• You can't use when/thenThrow and when/then for a void method.
• You can't use these syntaxes on Mockito spies.
• You can only call when once for each combination of mock object, method and arguments, unless you call reset on the mock.
• Calling when multiple times for one combination of mock object and method, when you are using argument matchers, can lead to problems.

I find these cases difficult to remember. So instead of trying to keep track of when the when/thenReturn, when/thenThrow and when/then syntaxes will and won't work, I prefer to avoid them completely, in favour of the doReturn/when, doThrow/when and doAnswer/when alternatives. That is to say, since you'll occasionally need doReturn/when, doThrow/when and doAnswer/when, and you can ALWAYS use these methods, there is no point in learning how to use when/thenReturn, when/thenThrow and when/then.

Note that doReturn, doThrow and doAnswer can be chained together in the same way as thenReturn, thenThrow and then. What they don't have is an option for returning several values (or throwing several exceptions, or running several answers) within a single call to doReturn, doThrow and doAnswer. But I find that I need to do this so seldom, that it doesn't really matter.

There's one more disadvantage to doReturn, which I consider insignificant. You don't get compile time checking of the type of its argument, like you do with when/thenReturn. So if you get the argument type wrong, you won't find out until you run your test. Frankly, I don't care.

In summary then, I have been using Mockito for more than two years, and I consider the consistent use of doReturn, doThrow and doAnswer to be a Mockito best practice. Other Mockito users disagree.

HttpResponse httpResponse = mock(HttpResponse.class);

see this: Mocking Apache HTTPClient using Mockito

In your later comments, I figured out the gap: You need to use Mockito as a Rule and Parameterized as a Runner, not the other way around.

The reason is that the Runner is responsible for reporting the number of tests, and Parameterized manipulates the number of tests based on the number of test methods and the number of parameterized inputs, so it's really important for Parameterized to be a part of the Runner process. By contrast, the use of a Mockito runner or rule is simply to encapsulate the @Before and @After methods that initialize Mockito annotations and validate Mockito usage, which can be done very easily as a @Rule that works adjacent to other @Rule instances--to the point that the MockitoJUnitRunner is very nearly deprecated.

To crib directly from the JUnit4 Parameterized Test doc page and MockitoRule doc page:

@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public class YourComponentTest {

    @Rule public MockitoRule rule = MockitoJUnit.rule();
    @Mock YourDep mockYourDep;

    @Parameters
    public static Collection<Object[]> data() {
        return Arrays.asList(new Object[][] {     
                 { 0, 0 }, { 1, 1 }, { 2, 1 }, { 3, 2 }, { 4, 3 }, { 5, 5 }, { 6, 8 }  
           });
    }

    private int fInput;

    private int fExpected;

    public YourComponentTest(int input, int expected) {
        fInput = input;
        fExpected = expected;
    }

    @Test
    public void test() {
        // As you may surmise, this is not a very realistic example of Mockito's use.
        when(mockYourDep.calculate(fInput)).thenReturn(fExpected);
        YourComponent yourComponent = new YourComponent(mockYourDep);
        assertEquals(fExpected, yourComponent.compute(fInput));
    }
}