How to use shouldVerify method of org.mockitousage.spies.SpyingOnRealObjectsTest class

Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockitousage.spies.SpyingOnRealObjectsTest.shouldVerify

copy

Full Screen

...20public class SpyingOnRealObjectsTest extends TestBase {21 List<String> list = new LinkedList<String>();22 List<String> spy = Mockito.spy(list);23 @Test24 public void shouldVerify() {25 spy.add("one");26 spy.add("two");27 Assert.assertEquals("one", spy.get(0));28 Assert.assertEquals("two", spy.get(1));29 Mockito.verify(spy).add("one");30 Mockito.verify(spy).add("two");31 }32 @SuppressWarnings({ "CheckReturnValue", "MockitoUsage" })33 @Test34 public void shouldBeAbleToMockObjectBecauseWhyNot() {35 Mockito.spy(new Object());36 }37 @Test38 public void shouldStub() {39 spy.add("one");40 Mockito.when(spy.get(0)).thenReturn("1").thenReturn("1 again");41 Assert.assertEquals("1", spy.get(0));42 Assert.assertEquals("1 again", spy.get(0));43 Assert.assertEquals("one", spy.iterator().next());44 Assert.assertEquals(1, spy.size());45 }46 @Test47 public void shouldAllowOverridingStubs() {48 Mockito.when(spy.contains(ArgumentMatchers.anyObject())).thenReturn(true);49 Mockito.when(spy.contains("foo")).thenReturn(false);50 Assert.assertTrue(spy.contains("bar"));51 Assert.assertFalse(spy.contains("foo"));52 }53 @Test54 public void shouldStubVoid() {55 Mockito.doNothing().doThrow(new RuntimeException()).when(spy).clear();56 spy.add("one");57 spy.clear();58 try {59 spy.clear();60 Assert.fail();61 } catch (RuntimeException e) {62 }63 Assert.assertEquals(1, spy.size());64 }65 @Test66 public void shouldStubWithDoReturnAndVerify() {67 Mockito.doReturn("foo").doReturn("bar").when(spy).get(0);68 Assert.assertEquals("foo", spy.get(0));69 Assert.assertEquals("bar", spy.get(0));70 Mockito.verify(spy, Mockito.times(2)).get(0);71 Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions(spy);72 }73 @Test74 public void shouldVerifyInOrder() {75 spy.add("one");76 spy.add("two");77 InOrder inOrder = Mockito.inOrder(spy);78 inOrder.verify(spy).add("one");79 inOrder.verify(spy).add("two");80 Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions(spy);81 }82 @Test83 public void shouldVerifyInOrderAndFail() {84 spy.add("one");85 spy.add("two");86 InOrder inOrder = Mockito.inOrder(spy);87 inOrder.verify(spy).add("two");88 try {89 inOrder.verify(spy).add("one");90 Assert.fail();91 } catch (VerificationInOrderFailure f) {92 }93 }94 @Test95 public void shouldVerifyNumberOfTimes() {96 spy.add("one");97 spy.add("one");98 Mockito.verify(spy, Mockito.times(2)).add("one");99 Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions(spy);100 }101 @Test102 public void shouldVerifyNumberOfTimesAndFail() {103 spy.add("one");104 spy.add("one");105 try {106 Mockito.verify(spy, Mockito.times(3)).add("one");107 Assert.fail();108 } catch (TooLittleActualInvocations e) {109 }110 }111 @Test112 public void shouldVerifyNoMoreInteractionsAndFail() {113 spy.add("one");114 spy.add("two");115 Mockito.verify(spy).add("one");116 try {117 Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions(spy);118 Assert.fail();119 } catch (NoInteractionsWanted e) {120 }121 }122 @Test123 public void shouldToString() {124 spy.add("foo");125 Assert.assertEquals("[foo]", spy.toString());126 }...

Full Screen

Full Screen

StackOverFlow community discussions

Questions
Discussion

Multiple RunWith Statements in jUnit

mockito anyList of a given size

when I run mockito test occurs WrongTypeOfReturnValue Exception

Mockito - separately verifying multiple invocations on the same method

@InjectMocks, the constructor or the initialization block threw an exception

Final method mocking

Android instrumentation tests with Mockito

PowerMock + Mockito VS Mockito alone

Mockito - Wanted but not invoked: Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock

Mock a constructor with parameter

You cannot do this because according to spec you cannot put the same annotation twice on the same annotated element.

So, what is the solution? The solution is to put only one @RunWith() with runner you cannot stand without and replace other one with something else. In your case I guess you will remove MockitoJUnitRunner and do programatically what it does.

In fact the only thing it does it runs:

MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(test);

in the beginning of test case. So, the simplest solution is to put this code into setUp() method:

@Before
public void setUp() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}

I am not sure, but probably you should avoid multiple call of this method using flag:

private boolean mockInitialized = false;
@Before
public void setUp() {
    if (!mockInitialized) {
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
        mockInitialized = true;  
    }
}

However better, reusable solution may be implemented with JUnt's rules.

public class MockitoRule extends TestWatcher {
    private boolean mockInitialized = false;

    @Override
    protected void starting(Description d) {
        if (!mockInitialized) {
            MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
            mockInitialized = true;  
        }
    }
}

Now just add the following line to your test class:

@Rule public MockitoRule mockitoRule = MockitoJUnit.rule();

and you can run this test case with any runner you want.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24431427/multiple-runwith-statements-in-junit

Blogs

Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:

Test Optimization for Continuous Integration

“Test frequently and early.” If you’ve been following my testing agenda, you’re probably sick of hearing me repeat that. However, it is making sense that if your tests detect an issue soon after it occurs, it will be easier to resolve. This is one of the guiding concepts that makes continuous integration such an effective method. I’ve encountered several teams who have a lot of automated tests but don’t use them as part of a continuous integration approach. There are frequently various reasons why the team believes these tests cannot be used with continuous integration. Perhaps the tests take too long to run, or they are not dependable enough to provide correct results on their own, necessitating human interpretation.

Oct’22 Updates: New Analytics And App Automation Dashboard, Test On Google Pixel 7 Series, And More

Hey everyone! We hope you had a great Hacktober. At LambdaTest, we thrive to bring you the best with each update. Our engineering and tech teams work at lightning speed to deliver you a seamless testing experience.

Unveiling Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 For Mobile App Testing

Hey LambdaTesters! We’ve got something special for you this week. ????

A Comprehensive Guide On JUnit 5 Extensions

JUnit is one of the most popular unit testing frameworks in the Java ecosystem. The JUnit 5 version (also known as Jupiter) contains many exciting innovations, including support for new features in Java 8 and above. However, many developers still prefer to use the JUnit 4 framework since certain features like parallel execution with JUnit 5 are still in the experimental phase.

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.

LambdaTest Learning Hubs:

YouTube

You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.

Try LambdaTest Now !!

Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!

Next-Gen App & Browser Testing Cloud

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

NotHelpful