How to use unfinished_stubbing_with_other_failure method of org.mockitousage.session.MockitoSessionTest class

You must use PowerMockito.spy() instead of Mockito.spy()!

Try to import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.spy;

There are a couple things you seem to have crossed up in your test. There are integration tests and unit tests. Integration tests will test everything (or almost everything) all hooked up - so you use Spring configuration files very close to the real ones and real examples of objects get injected to your class under test. That's mostly what I use @ContextConfiguration but I use that in conjunction with @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)

If you are using Mockito (or any mocking framework), it is usually because you want to isolate the class you are testing from real implementations of other classes. So instead of, for example, having to contrive a way to get your RegistrationService to throw a NumberFormatException to test that code path, you just tell the mock RegistrationService to do it. There are lots of other examples where it is more convenient to use mocks than to use real class instances.

So, that mini-lesson finished. Here is how I would re-write your test class (with an extra example and commented along the way).

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class RegistrationControllerTest {

    // Create an instance of what you are going to test.
    // When using the @InjectMocks annotation, you must create the instance in
    // the constructor or in the field declaration.
    @InjectMocks
    private RegistrationController controllerUT = new RegistrationController();

    // The @Mock annotation creates the mock instance of the class and
    // automatically injects into the object annotated with @InjectMocks (if
    // possible).
    @Mock
    private RegistrationService registrationService;
    // This @Mock annotation simply creates a mock instance. There is nowhere to
    // inject it. Depending on the particular circumstance, it may be better or
    // clearer to instantiate the mock explicitly in the test itself, but we're
    // doing it here for illustration. Also, I don't know what your real class
    // is like, but it may be more appropriate to just instantiate a real one
    // than a mock one.
    @Mock
    private ModelMap model;
    // Same as above
    @Mock
    private BulkRegistration bulkRegistration;
    // Same as above
    @Mock
    private FileData fileData;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        // We want to make sure that when we call getFileData(), it returns
        // something non-null, so we return the mock of fileData.
        when(bulkRegistration.getFileData()).thenReturn(fileData);
    }

    /**
     * This test very narrowly tests the correct next page. That is why there is
     * so little expectation setting on the mocks. If you want to test other
     * things, such as behavior when you get an exception or having the expected
     * filename, you would write other tests.
     */
    @Test
    public void testCreate() throws Exception {
        final String target = "bulkRegistration";
        // Here we create a default instance of BindingResult. You don't need to
        // mock everything.
        BindingResult result = new BindingResult();

        String nextPage = null;
        // Perform the action
        nextPage = controllerUT.create(bulkRegistration, result, model);
        // Assert the result. This test fails, but it's for the right reason -
        // you expect "bulkRegistration", but you get "registration".
        assertEquals("Controller is not requesting the correct form", nextPage,
                target);

    }

    /**
     * Here is a simple example to simulate an exception being thrown by one of
     * the collaborators.
     * 
     * @throws Exception
     */
    @Test(expected = NumberFormatException.class)
    public void testCreateWithNumberFormatException() throws Exception {
        doThrow(new NumberFormatException()).when(registrationService)
                .processFile(any(File.class), anyList());
        BindingResult result = new BindingResult();
        // Perform the action
        controllerUT.create(bulkRegistration, result, model);
    }
}

I think what you are trying to test is aspect weaving and pointcut matching. Please note that that would be an integration rather than a unit test. If you really want to unit test your aspect logic and because you have tagged the question by "mockito" anyway, I suggest you do just that: Write a unit test and mock the aspect's joinpoint and maybe its other parameters, if any. Here is a slightly more complex example with some intra-aspect logic:

Java class to be targeted by aspect:

package de.scrum_master.app;

public class Application {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Application().doSomething(11);
        new Application().doSomething(-22);
        new Application().doSomething(333);
    }

    public void doSomething(int number) {
        System.out.println("Doing something with number " + number);
    }
}

Aspect under test:

package de.scrum_master.aspect;

import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;

@Aspect
public class SampleAspect {
    @Around("execution(* doSomething(int)) && args(number)")
    public Object intercept(final ProceedingJoinPoint thisJoinPoint, int number) throws Throwable {
        System.out.println(thisJoinPoint + " -> " + number);
        if (number < 0)
            return thisJoinPoint.proceed(new Object[] { -number });
        if (number > 99)
            throw new RuntimeException("oops");
        return thisJoinPoint.proceed();
    }
}

Console log when running Application.main(..):

As you can see, the aspect passes on 11, negates -22 and throws an exception for 333:

execution(void de.scrum_master.app.Application.doSomething(int)) -> 11
Doing something with number 11
execution(void de.scrum_master.app.Application.doSomething(int)) -> -22
Doing something with number 22
execution(void de.scrum_master.app.Application.doSomething(int)) -> 333
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: oops
    at de.scrum_master.aspect.SampleAspect.intercept(SampleAspect.aj:15)
    at de.scrum_master.app.Application.doSomething(Application.java:10)
    at de.scrum_master.app.Application.main(Application.java:7)

Unit test for aspect:

Now we really want to verify that the aspect does what it should and cover all execution paths:

package de.scrum_master.aspect;

import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnit;
import org.mockito.junit.MockitoRule;

import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;

public class SampleAspectTest {
    @Rule
    public MockitoRule mockitoRule = MockitoJUnit.rule();

    @Mock
    private ProceedingJoinPoint proceedingJoinPoint;

    private SampleAspect sampleAspect = new SampleAspect();

    @Test
    public void testPositiveSmallNumber() throws Throwable {
        sampleAspect.intercept(proceedingJoinPoint, 11);
        // 'proceed()' is called exactly once
        verify(proceedingJoinPoint, times(1)).proceed();
        // 'proceed(Object[])' is never called
        verify(proceedingJoinPoint, never()).proceed(null);
    }

    @Test
    public void testNegativeNumber() throws Throwable {
        sampleAspect.intercept(proceedingJoinPoint, -22);
        // 'proceed()' is never called
        verify(proceedingJoinPoint, never()).proceed();
        // 'proceed(Object[])' is called exactly once
        verify(proceedingJoinPoint, times(1)).proceed(new Object[] { 22 });
    }

    @Test(expected = RuntimeException.class)
    public void testPositiveLargeNumber() throws Throwable {
        sampleAspect.intercept(proceedingJoinPoint, 333);
    }
}

Now run this simple JUnit + Mockito test in order to test the aspect logic in isolation, not the wiring/weaving logic. For the latter you would need another type of test.

P.S.: Only for you I used JUnit and Mockito. Usually I just use Spock and its built-in mocking capabilities. ;-)

This could be achieved by PowerMockito framework.

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SomeClass.class)
public class SomeClassTest {

    private SomeClass someInstance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() throws Exception {

        someInstance = PowerMockito.spy(new SomeClass());
    }

    @Test
    public void sendRequest() throws Exception {

        String json = "JSON";
        String text = "Some text";
        int messageId = 1;

        PowerMockito.doReturn(true).when(someInstance, "isMethod");
        PowerMockito.doReturn(messageId).when(someInstance, "getMessageId", json);

        someInstance.sendRequest(json, text);

        PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(someInstance).invoke("isMethod");
        PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(someInstance).invoke("getMessageId", json);
        PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(someInstance).invoke("sendMessage", messageId, text);
    }

}

With Mockito framework, you can use AdditionalMatchers

ClassA classA = Mockito.mock(ClassA.class);
Mockito.when(classA.getString(Matchers.eq("a"))).thenReturn("something"); 
Mockito.when(classA.getString(AdditionalMatchers.not(Matchers.eq("a")))).thenReturn("something else");

Hope it helps.

You can do something like this:

YourService serviceMock = Mockito.mock(YourService.class);

// code using YourService

// details of all invocations including methods and arguments
Collection<Invocation> invocations = Mockito.mockingDetails(serviceMock).getInvocations();
// just a number of calls of any mock's methods
int numberOfCalls = invocations.size();

If you want only the invocations of certain method/param combination you, you can do so with

int specificMethodCall = Mockito.mockingDetails(serviceMock.myMethod(myParam)).getInvocations()

You can't instantiate an abstract class directly, but you can easily instantiate an anonymous subclass, and that's pretty trivial in this case as you're not forced to define any methods:

Mockito.when(mockDAO.getDatabaseResults()).thenThrow(new ProblemException(){});

Alternatively, you can just use another mock:

Mockito.when(mockDAO.getDatabaseResults()).thenThrow(Mockito.mock(ProblemException.class));

This would make sense if the abstract class forced the definition of other methods you don't care about in your test.

You can chain doReturn() method calls:

doReturn(true).doReturn(true).doReturn(false).when(rs).next();

Or, as mentioned in the comments, chain thenReturn method calls:

when(rs.next()).thenReturn(true).thenReturn(true).thenReturn(false);

Or, if you want to take things even further, you can use Mockito Answers:

when(rs.next()).thenAnswer(new Answer() {
    private int iterations = 2;

    Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
        return iterations-- > 0;
    }
});

Mockito 1.9.0 introduced listeners and now bundles a verbose logger:

So basically if you want simple and stupid logs, just do the following:

List mockWithLogger = mock(List.class, withSettings().verboseLogging());

See #verboseLogging() for more information

Cheers,