How to use shouldVerifyCorrectlyWithAnyVarargs method of org.mockitousage.bugs.varargs.VarargsAndAnyObjectPicksUpExtraInvocationsTest class

You can mock without usage of the PowerMock it but in a slightly more complicated way:

KeyStoreSpi keyStoreSpiMock = mock(KeyStoreSpi.class);
KeyStore keyStoreMock = new KeyStore(keyStoreSpiMock, null, "test"){ };
keyStoreMock.load(null);  // this is important to put the internal state "initialized" to true

From now you just mock keyStoreSpiMock, for example:

when(keyStoreSpiMock.engineGetKey(any(), any())).thenReturn(mock(Key.class);

Most important concept in the Gradle java-test-fixtures plugin is stated in their documentation:

[this plugin] will automatically create a testFixtures source set, in which you can write your test fixtures. Test fixtures are configured so that:

• they can see the main source set classes
• test sources can see the test fixtures classes

This plugin will indeed create the following dependencies: main <-- testFixtures , and testFixtures <-- test

In your case, testFixtures module should automatically depend on main sources, and also on main dependencies declared in api scope ( com.my.extenal.project:1.0)

See a similar example in a valid sample project here https://github.com/mricciuti/so-64133013 :

• Simpsons class has access to Person class from main module
• TestHelpers class has access to main dependencies declared in api configuration

Note that testFixtures will not inherit dependencies from the test module: if you need to use such libraries in this module (eg. JUnit, Mockito, ...) you will need to declare explicit dependency , using testFixturesImplementation or testFixturesApi configuration.

See example in core-module

plugins {
    id ("java-library")
    id ("java-test-fixtures")
}
dependencies {
    // Main dependencies
    //   will be available in "testFixture" as well thanks to "api" configuration
    api("org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.9")
    api(project(":utils-module"))

    // Testfixture dependencies
        // ==> mockito lib will be available in testFixture module and also in consumer modules (e.g test)
    testFixturesApi("org.mockito:mockito-core:3.5.13")

    // Test dependencies
       // dependencies specific to the "test" module; not visible from "testFixtures"
    testImplementation("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api:5.3.1")
    testRuntimeOnly ("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine:5.3.1")
}

To test the lambdas behavior, the underlayingApi has to be mocked where the lambda is invoked via the InvoactionOnMock object like this.

    `when`(underlayingApi.post(eq("some/rest/url"),
                               any())).thenAnswer {
        val argument = it.arguments[1]
        val completion = argument as ((rawResult: String?, exception: Exception?) -> Unit)
        completion.invoke("result", null)
    }

This leads to the invocation of the callback within the object under test. Now to check if the callback out of the object under test is working verify it like that.

    objUnderTest.loadData(id,
                          { json, exception ->
                              assert....
                          })

Something like this should do it (not tested):

doAnswer(new Answer() {
    public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
        Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
        List<?> list = (List<?>) args[0];
        list.clear();
        return null;
    }
}).when(test).clearList(any(List.class));

You can use below line to mock java.lang.reflect.Method:

Method mockMethod = this.getClass().getMethod(methodName);

It is not allowed to use mock or spy in straight forward way to create a mock object for java.lang.reflect.Method!

When you want to use the @Mock annotation you should use the MockitoJUnitRunner

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class MockitoTest {

    @Mock
    private IRoutingObjHttpClient routingClientMock;

    @Test
    public void testSendRoutingRequest() throws Exception {
        // ...
    }

}

See also this tutorial.

You should also mock the next() method to have it return true the first time it's called, as mockito will return false by default.

Mockito.when(resultSetMock.next()).thenReturn(true).thenReturn(false);

TestPropertySource sets a location to a property file. It is even possible to inline specific values:

@TestPropertySource(properties = { "task.enabled = false" })

For the mocks initialization, using the runner or the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks are strictly equivalent solutions. From the javadoc of the MockitoJUnitRunner :

JUnit 4.5 runner initializes mocks annotated with Mock, so that explicit usage of MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(Object) is not necessary. Mocks are initialized before each test method.

The first solution (with the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks) could be used when you have already configured a specific runner (SpringJUnit4ClassRunner for example) on your test case.

The second solution (with the MockitoJUnitRunner) is the more classic and my favorite. The code is simpler. Using a runner provides the great advantage of automatic validation of framework usage (described by @David Wallace in this answer).

Both solutions allows to share the mocks (and spies) between the test methods. Coupled with the @InjectMocks, they allow to write unit tests very quickly. The boilerplate mocking code is reduced, the tests are easier to read. For example:

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock(name = "database") private ArticleDatabase dbMock;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @InjectMocks private ArticleManager manager;

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        manager.initiateArticle();
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        manager.finishArticle();
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: The code is minimal

Cons: Black magic. IMO it is mainly due to the @InjectMocks annotation. With this annotation "you loose the pain of code" (see the great comments of @Brice)

The third solution is to create your mock on each test method. It allow as explained by @mlk in its answer to have "self contained test".

public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (BDD...)

Cons: there is more boilerplate code. (The mocks creation)

My recommandation is a compromise. Use the @Mock annotation with the @RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class), but do not use the @InjectMocks :

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock private ArticleDatabase database;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (How my ArticleManager is instantiated). No boilerplate code.

Cons: The test is not self contained, less pain of code