Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockitousage.bugs.deepstubs.DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.getSomething
Source:DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.java
...10 */11public class DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest {12 @Test13 public void should_not_raise_a_mockito_exception_about_serialization_when_accessing_deep_stub() {14 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.NotSerializableShouldBeMocked the_deep_stub = Mockito.mock(DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.ToBeDeepStubbed.class, Mockito.RETURNS_DEEP_STUBS).getSomething();15 assertThat(the_deep_stub).isNotNull();16 }17 public static class ToBeDeepStubbed {18 public ToBeDeepStubbed() {19 }20 public DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.NotSerializableShouldBeMocked getSomething() {21 return null;22 }23 }24 public static class NotSerializableShouldBeMocked {25 NotSerializableShouldBeMocked(String mandatory_param) {26 }27 }28}...
getSomething
Using AI Code Generation
1public class DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest extends MockitoTest {2 private static final String TEST_STRING = "test";3 private DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest nestedMock;4 private DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest mock;5 public void shouldWork() {6 nestedMock = mock(DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.class);7 mock = mock(DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.class);8 when(mock.getSomething()).thenReturn(TEST_STRING);9 assertEquals(TEST_STRING, mock.getSomething());10 }11 public DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest getSomething() {12 return nestedMock;13 }14}15public class DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest extends MockitoTest {16 private static final String TEST_STRING = "test";17 private DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest nestedMock;18 private DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest mock;19 public void shouldWork() {20 nestedMock = mock(DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.class);21 mock = mock(DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest.class);22 when(mock.getSomething()).thenReturn(TEST_STRING);23 assertEquals(TEST_STRING, mock.getSomething());24 }25 public DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest getSomething() {26 return nestedMock;27 }28}29 when(mock.getSomething()).thenReturn(TEST_STRING);
getSomething
Using AI Code Generation
1public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {2 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();3 test.getSomething();4}5public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {6 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();7 test.getSomething();8}9public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {10 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();11 test.getSomething();12}13public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {14 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();15 test.getSomething();16}17public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {18 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();19 test.getSomething();20}21public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {22 DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest test = new DeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest();23 test.getSomething();24}25public void shouldAllowToUseGetSomethingMethodOfDeepStubsWronglyReportsSerializationProblemsTest() {
Is it unnecessary to verify the same methods as the methods being mocked in Mockito?
Why does mockito report error on thenReturn() in java 7 but not in java 6
Mockito thenThrow throws mockito exception
Mock Static Methods in JUnit5 using PowerMockito
Mockito: Trying to spy on method is calling the original method
Mockito exception in doThrow that looks correct
mockito return sequence of objects on spy method
junit testing for user input using Scanner
Difference between stub and when in mockito
A strange generics edge case with Mockito.when() and generic type inference
The Mockito documentation repeatedly says it is often redundant. This appears verbatim both in verify(T)
's Javadoc as multiple single-line comments in the code block in Mockito's main class Javadoc section 2:
Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, usually it's just redundant. If your code cares what
get(0)
returns, then something else breaks (often even beforeverify()
gets executed). If your code doesn't care whatget(0)
returns, then it should not be stubbed. Not convinced? See here.
Note that the originally linked article, "Asking and Telling", was written by Mockito originator Szczepan Faber and can be considered an authoritative document in Mockito's design. To excerpt from that post:
Do I really have to repeat the same expression? After all, stubbed interactions are verified implicitly. The execution flow of my own code does it completely for free. Aaron Jensen also noticed that:
If you’re verifying you don’t need to stub unless of course that method returns something that is critical to the flow of your test (or code), in which case you don’t really need to verify, because the flow would have verified.
Just to recap: there is no repeated code.
But what if an interesting interaction shares the characteristic of both asking and telling? Do I have to repeat interactions in stub() and verify()? Will I end up with duplicated code? Not really. In practice: If I stub then it is verified for free, so I don’t verify. If I verify then I don’t care about the return value, so I don’t stub. Either way, I don’t repeat myself. In theory though, I can imagine a rare case where I do verify a stubbed interaction, for example to make sure the stubbed interaction happened exactly n times. But this is a different aspect of behavior and apparently an interesting one. Therefore I want to be explicit and I am perfectly happy to sacrifice one extra line of code…
Recent versions of Mockito (released since this Q&A was posted) have added some additional features that allow or default to stricter mocking styles. Despite this, the prevailing expectation is to avoid brittleness by only verifying what you can't confirm through assertions or successful test completion.
Overall, Mockito's design is to allow tests to be as flexible as possible, coding not to the implementation but instead to the spec of the method you're testing. Though you'll occasionally see a method call as part of a function's spec ("Submits an RPC to the server" or "Calls the passed LoginCallback immediately"), it's much more likely that you'll want to validate the postconditions that you can infer from the stubs: Checking that getFoo
was called isn't really a part of the spec as long as you stubbed getFoo
to return "foo" and the data store contains a single object with its corresponding property set to "foo".
In short, it is considered good Mockito style to explicitly verify only the interactions that can't be implied from well-crafted stubs and postcondition assertions. They may be good calls for otherwise-unmeasurable side effects—logging code, thread executors, ArgumentCaptors, multiple method calls, callback functions—but generally should not be applied to stubbed interactions.
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
If you are a web tester then somewhere down the road you will have to come across Selenium, an open-source test automation framework that has been on boom ever since its launch in 2004.
Even though several frameworks are available in the market for automation testing, Selenium is one of the most renowned open-source frameworks used by experts due to its numerous features and benefits.
Were you able to work upon your resolutions for 2019? I may sound comical here but my 2019 resolution being a web developer was to take a leap into web testing in my free time. Why? So I could understand the release cycles from a tester’s perspective. I wanted to wear their shoes and see the SDLC from their eyes. I also thought that it would help me groom myself better as an all-round IT professional.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!