How to use call_a_lot_of_mocks_using_one_line_stubbing method of org.mockitoinline.OneLinerStubStressTest class

Mockito cannot mock static method. Your when check is not valid:

  when(BasketHelper.getAction(request)).thenReturn(0);
  when(BasketHelper.getActionProduct(site, request)).thenReturn(product);

That is another reason why we want to reduce the use of static method as it is hard to mock.

There is no easier way to mock the behavior if your class stays like this. However if you want to change your design and make both methods non-static. The correct way of using "when" is to apply the check on mocked object. For example:

  BasketHelper basketHelper = mock(BasketHelper.class);
  when(basketHelper.getAction(request)).thenReturn(0);
  when(basketHelper.getActionProduct(site, request)).thenReturn(product);

But once again, this only work if you re-designed your class's getAction and getProduct method to be NON-STATIC.

I remember there are some other testing framework that does support mocking static method.

You need a Method object and a Class object. As per your comment, Mockito cannot mock a Method, so you'll need a real one. I haven't tested this, but I believe this would work. Instead of:

when(mockContext.getMethod().getName()).thenReturn("someMethod");
when(mockContext.getMethod().getDeclaringClass().getName()).thenReturn("someClass");

You need:

// any method will do, but here is an example of how to get one.
Method testMethod = this.getClass().getMethod("logCallTest");

when(mockContext.getMethod()).thenReturn(testMethod);

Obviously, getName() will not return "someMethod" anymore and getDeclaringClass().getName() will return the name of this test class (in the example), but although you couldn't pick what they return, what they return is still deterministic, so you should be able to verify anything you need. (Of course, if you needed to spy or verify that a call was made on the Method object itself, you're still stuck.)

how about you create an anonymous exception of type JsonProcessingException

when(mapper.writeValueAsString(any(Object.class))).thenThrow(new JsonProcessingException("Error"){});

The {} braces does the trick. This is much better since it is not confusing to the reader of the test code.

Take advantage of the fact that InitialContext uses an SPI to handle its creation. You can hook into its lifecycle by creating an implementation of javax.naming.spi.InitialContextFactory and passing that to your tests via the system property javax.naming.factory.initial (Context.INTITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY). It's simpler than it sounds.

Given this class:

public class UseInitialContext {

    public UseInitialContext() {
        try {
            InitialContext ic = new InitialContext();
            Object myObject = ic.lookup("myObject");
            System.out.println(myObject);
        } catch (NamingException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }


} 

And this impl of InitialContextFactory:

public class MyInitialContextFactory implements InitialContextFactory {

    public Context getInitialContext(Hashtable<?, ?> arg0)
            throws NamingException {

        Context context = Mockito.mock(Context.class);
        Mockito.when(context.lookup("myObject")).thenReturn("This is my object!!");
        return context;
    }
}

Creating an instance of UseInitialContext in a junit test with

-Djava.naming.initial.factory=initial.context.test.MyInitialContext

on the command line outputs This is my object!! (easy to set up in eclipse). I like Mockito for mocking and stubbing. I'd also recommend Micheal Feather's Working Effectively with Legacy Code if you deal with lots of legacy code. It's all about how to find seams in programs in order to isolate specific pieces for testing.

import org.springframework.test.util.ReflectionTestUtils;

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public CustomServiceTest{

@InjectMocks
private CustomServiceImpl customService;

@Mock
private DataService dataService;

@Before
public void setup() {
    ReflectionTestUtils.setField(customService, "url", "http://someurl");
}    
...
}

Mockito was developed to allow BDD-style unit testing, that is:

• Given (the context in which your unit-test runs)
• When (the events producing the behaviour you're interested in)
• Then (the outcome you're looking for).

as opposed to

• Given
• Expect (here's where the verification gets done)
• When
• Then (go back and look at what you wrote in the Expect because there's no actual info here).

IMHO it produces more readable tests, and allows you to separate things like the context in which you're running (setting up the Mocks) and verification of the behaviour you're interested in. Previous mocking frameworks required you to set up expectations for every interaction, regardless of whether it was relevant to the aspect of behaviour you were looking at in that test or not.

You need to inject mock inside the class you're testing. At the moment you're interacting with the real object, not with the mock one. You can fix the code in a following way:

void testAbc(){
     myClass.myObj = myInteface;
     myClass.abc();
     verify(myInterface).myMethodToBeVerified(new String("a"), new String("b"));
}

although it would be a wiser choice to extract all initialization code into @Before

@Before
void setUp(){
     myClass = new myClass();
     myClass.myObj = myInteface;
}

@Test
void testAbc(){
     myClass.abc();
     verify(myInterface).myMethodToBeVerified(new String("a"), new String("b"));
}

You could also Stub Consecutive Calls (#10 in 2.8.9 api). In this case, you would use multiple thenReturn calls or one thenReturn call with multiple parameters (varargs).

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;

public class TestClass {

    private Foo mockFoo;

    @Before
    public void setup() {
        setupFoo();
    }

    @Test
    public void testFoo() {
        TestObject testObj = new TestObject(mockFoo);

        assertEquals(0, testObj.bar());
        assertEquals(1, testObj.bar());
        assertEquals(-1, testObj.bar());
        assertEquals(-1, testObj.bar());
    }

    private void setupFoo() {
        mockFoo = mock(Foo.class);

        when(mockFoo.someMethod())
            .thenReturn(0)
            .thenReturn(1)
            .thenReturn(-1); //any subsequent call will return -1

        // Or a bit shorter with varargs:
        when(mockFoo.someMethod())
            .thenReturn(0, 1, -1); //any subsequent call will return -1
    }
}

When you say

@Mock
Fruit fruit;

You tell Mockito: the fruit variable should be an instance of Fruit. Mockito will dynamically create a class which implements Fruit (this class is Fruit$$EnhancerByMockitoWithCGLIB$$b8254f54), and create an instance of this class. There's no reason for this class to be an instance of AppleFruit, since you didn't tell Mockito that the object had to be of type AppleFruit.

Declare it as AppleFruit, and it will be of type AppleFruit.