How to use getLoggedInfo method of org.mockito.runners.ConsoleSpammingMockitoJUnitRunnerTest class

For some reason, your test suite, tries to load the MockitoJunitRunner from the org.mockito.junit contained in the Mockito versions >= 2. O. In that version, the line:

at org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnitRunner.<init>(MockitoJUnitRunner.java:152)

is doing this:

public MockitoJUnitRunner(Class<?> klass) throws InvocationTargetException {
        //by default, StrictRunner is used. We can change that potentially based on feedback from users
        this(new StrictRunner(new RunnerFactory().createStrict(klass), klass));
    }

and the RunnerFactory that is loaded here is from version 1.x as createStrict has been introduced in Mockito 2.x.

So go through the pom dependency tree and to find what artifact implicitly add the Mockito 2.x dependency to your project and exclude it.

Alternatively.. as a workaround, instead of the @RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class) you can use:

@Before
public void init() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}

You can also check out this Mockito cheat sheet to keep all the standards at hand.

The documentation covers this explicitly. You want to call verifyNoMoreInteractions, either after calling verify (as per the docs) or

verify(execution).getLastQty();
verify(execution).getLastPrice();
verifyNoMoreInteractions(execution);

or using ignoreStubs:

verifyNoMoreInteractions(ignoreStubs(execution));

You can use PowerMockito along with Mockito to mock static methods:

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(ServiceLoader.class)
public class PowerMockingStaticTest
{
    @Mock
    private ServiceLoader mockServiceLoader;

    @Before
    public void setUp()
    {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(ServiceLoader.class);
        Mockito.when(ServiceLoader.load(Mockito.any(Class.class))).thenReturn(mockServiceLoader);
    }

    @Test
    public void test()
    {
        Assert.assertEquals(mockServiceLoader, ServiceLoader.load(Object.class));
    }
}

Take a look at the Mockito API docs. As the linked document mentions (Point # 12) you can use any of the doThrow(),doAnswer(),doNothing(),doReturn() family of methods from Mockito framework to mock void methods.

For example,

Mockito.doThrow(new Exception()).when(instance).methodName();

or if you want to combine it with follow-up behavior,

Mockito.doThrow(new Exception()).doNothing().when(instance).methodName();

Presuming that you are looking at mocking the setter setState(String s) in the class World below is the code uses doAnswer method to mock the setState.

World mockWorld = mock(World.class); 
doAnswer(new Answer<Void>() {
    public Void answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
      Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
      System.out.println("called with arguments: " + Arrays.toString(args));
      return null;
    }
}).when(mockWorld).setState(anyString());

You do not need mockito to test this method, only a java.io.StringWriter.

Here is how you can write the test for a nominal use:

@Test
void status_written_in_csv_format() {
    // Setup
    WriteCsvToResponse objectUnderTest = new WriteCsvToResponse ();
    StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
    PrintWriter printWriter = new PrintWriter(stringWriter);

    // Given
    Status status = ...

    // When
    objectUnderTest.writeStatus(printWriter, status);

    // Then
    String actualCsv = stringWriter.toString();
    assertThat(actualCsv.split("\n"))
       .as("Produced CSV")
       .containsExactly(
         "id,storeId,status",
         "42,142,OK");
}

This example assume some things about your Status object, but you have the general idea. For assertions, I use AssertJ, but you can do the same with JUnit5 built-in assertions.

Hope this helps !

Iterator mockIterator = mock(Iterator.class);
doCallRealMethod().when(fruits).forEach(any(Consumer.class));
when(fruits.iterator()).thenReturn(mockIterator);
when(mockIterator.hasNext()).thenReturn(true, false);
when(mockIterator.next()).thenReturn(mockObject);

The Mockito documentation repeatedly says it is often redundant. This appears verbatim both in verify(T)'s Javadoc as multiple single-line comments in the code block in Mockito's main class Javadoc section 2:

Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, usually it's just redundant. If your code cares what get(0) returns, then something else breaks (often even before verify() gets executed). If your code doesn't care what get(0) returns, then it should not be stubbed. Not convinced? See here.

Note that the originally linked article, "Asking and Telling", was written by Mockito originator Szczepan Faber and can be considered an authoritative document in Mockito's design. To excerpt from that post:

Do I really have to repeat the same expression? After all, stubbed interactions are verified implicitly. The execution flow of my own code does it completely for free. Aaron Jensen also noticed that:

If you’re verifying you don’t need to stub unless of course that method returns something that is critical to the flow of your test (or code), in which case you don’t really need to verify, because the flow would have verified.

Just to recap: there is no repeated code.

But what if an interesting interaction shares the characteristic of both asking and telling? Do I have to repeat interactions in stub() and verify()? Will I end up with duplicated code? Not really. In practice: If I stub then it is verified for free, so I don’t verify. If I verify then I don’t care about the return value, so I don’t stub. Either way, I don’t repeat myself. In theory though, I can imagine a rare case where I do verify a stubbed interaction, for example to make sure the stubbed interaction happened exactly n times. But this is a different aspect of behavior and apparently an interesting one. Therefore I want to be explicit and I am perfectly happy to sacrifice one extra line of code…

Recent versions of Mockito (released since this Q&A was posted) have added some additional features that allow or default to stricter mocking styles. Despite this, the prevailing expectation is to avoid brittleness by only verifying what you can't confirm through assertions or successful test completion.

Overall, Mockito's design is to allow tests to be as flexible as possible, coding not to the implementation but instead to the spec of the method you're testing. Though you'll occasionally see a method call as part of a function's spec ("Submits an RPC to the server" or "Calls the passed LoginCallback immediately"), it's much more likely that you'll want to validate the postconditions that you can infer from the stubs: Checking that getFoo was called isn't really a part of the spec as long as you stubbed getFoo to return "foo" and the data store contains a single object with its corresponding property set to "foo".

In short, it is considered good Mockito style to explicitly verify only the interactions that can't be implied from well-crafted stubs and postcondition assertions. They may be good calls for otherwise-unmeasurable side effects—logging code, thread executors, ArgumentCaptors, multiple method calls, callback functions—but generally should not be applied to stubbed interactions.

For Jersey web services testing there are several testing frameworks, namely: Jersey Test Framework (already mentioned in other answer - see here documentation for version 1.17 here: https://jersey.java.net/documentation/1.17/test-framework.html) and REST-Assured (https://code.google.com/p/rest-assured) - see here a comparison/setup of both (http://www.hascode.com/2011/09/rest-assured-vs-jersey-test-framework-testing-your-restful-web-services/).

I find the REST-Assured more interesting and powerful, but Jersey Test Framework is very easy to use too. In REST-Assured to write a test case "to check response status and json format" you could write the following test (very much like you do in jUnit):

package com.example.rest;

import static com.jayway.restassured.RestAssured.expect;
import groovyx.net.http.ContentType;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;

import com.jayway.restassured.RestAssured;

public class Products{

    @Before
    public void setUp(){
        RestAssured.basePath = "http://localhost:8080";
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetProducts(){
        expect().statusCode(200).contentType(ContentType.JSON).when()
                .get("/getProducts/companyid/companyname/12345088723");
    }

}

This should do the trick for you... you can verify JSON specific elements also very easily and many other details. For instructions on more features you can check the very good guide from REST-Assured (https://code.google.com/p/rest-assured/wiki/Usage). Another good tutorial is this one http://www.hascode.com/2011/10/testing-restful-web-services-made-easy-using-the-rest-assured-framework/.

HTH.

When you mock an object using Mockito in Java. The framework doesn't change anything to the language specification. And in Java, the throws clause is defined at the compilation. You can't change the declared exceptions at runtime. In your case, if you call the method MyObject.call(), you have to handle the SomeException as in any normal Java code.

Since in unit test, you don't want to handle with things you are not testing. In your case, I would simply redeclare throws SomeException in the test method.