Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockito.moduletest.ModuleHandlingTest.can_define_class_in_open_non_reading_module
Source: ModuleHandlingTest.java
...104 Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(contextLoader);105 }106 }107 @Test108 public void can_define_class_in_open_non_reading_module() throws Exception {109 Assume.assumeThat(((Plugins.getMockMaker()) instanceof InlineByteBuddyMockMaker), Is.is(false));110 Path jar = ModuleHandlingTest.modularJar(true, true, true);111 ModuleLayer layer = layer(jar, false);112 ClassLoader loader = layer.findLoader("mockito.test");113 Class<?> type = loader.loadClass("sample.MyCallable");114 ClassLoader contextLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();115 Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(loader);116 try {117 Class<?> mockito = loader.loadClass(Mockito.class.getName());118 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")119 Callable<String> mock = ((Callable<String>) (mockito.getMethod("mock", Class.class).invoke(null, type)));120 Object stubbing = mockito.getMethod("when", Object.class).invoke(null, mock.call());121 loader.loadClass(OngoingStubbing.class.getName()).getMethod("thenCallRealMethod").invoke(stubbing);122 assertThat(mock.getClass().getName()).startsWith("sample.MyCallable$MockitoMock$");...
Testing Private method using mockito
Bad <init> method call from inside of a branch
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.InvalidUseOfMatchersException:
Mockito - NullpointerException when stubbing Method
Mockito mock calling real method implementation when attempting to stub package protected method
Simulation of Service using Mockito 2 leads to stubbing error
How to mock void methods with Mockito
mockito return sequence of objects on spy method
PowerMock access private members
Avoiding unchecked warnings when using Mockito
Not possible through mockito. From their wiki
Why Mockito doesn't mock private methods?
Firstly, we are not dogmatic about mocking private methods. We just don't care about private methods because from the standpoint of testing private methods don't exist. Here are a couple of reasons Mockito doesn't mock private methods:
It requires hacking of classloaders that is never bullet proof and it changes the api (you must use custom test runner, annotate the class, etc.).
It is very easy to work around - just change the visibility of method from private to package-protected (or protected).
It requires me to spend time implementing & maintaining it. And it does not make sense given point #2 and a fact that it is already implemented in different tool (powermock).
Finally... Mocking private methods is a hint that there is something wrong with OO understanding. In OO you want objects (or roles) to collaborate, not methods. Forget about pascal & procedural code. Think in objects.
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Automation frameworks enable automation testers by simplifying the test development and execution activities. A typical automation framework provides an environment for executing test plans and generating repeatable output. They are specialized tools that assist you in your everyday test automation tasks. Whether it is a test runner, an action recording tool, or a web testing tool, it is there to remove all the hard work from building test scripts and leave you with more time to do quality checks. Test Automation is a proven, cost-effective approach to improving software development. Therefore, choosing the best test automation framework can prove crucial to your test results and QA timeframes.
Automation frameworks enable automation testers by simplifying the test development and execution activities. A typical automation framework provides an environment for executing test plans and generating repeatable output. They are specialized tools that assist you in your everyday test automation tasks. Whether it is a test runner, an action recording tool, or a web testing tool, it is there to remove all the hard work from building test scripts and leave you with more time to do quality checks. Test Automation is a proven, cost-effective approach to improving software development. Therefore, choosing the best test automation framework can prove crucial to your test results and QA timeframes.
So, now that the first installment of this two fold article has been published (hence you might have an idea of what Agile Testing is not in my opinion), I’ve started feeling the pressure to explain what Agile Testing actually means to me.
I was once asked at a testing summit, “How do you manage a QA team using scrum?” After some consideration, I realized it would make a good article, so here I am. Understand that the idea behind developing software in a scrum environment is for development teams to self-organize.
Manual cross browser testing is neither efficient nor scalable as it will take ages to test on all permutations & combinations of browsers, operating systems, and their versions. Like every developer, I have also gone through that ‘I can do it all phase’. But if you are stuck validating your code changes over hundreds of browsers and OS combinations then your release window is going to look even shorter than it already is. This is why automated browser testing can be pivotal for modern-day release cycles as it speeds up the entire process of cross browser compatibility.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!