How to use shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent method of org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers.MissingInvocationInOrderCheckerTest class

Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers.MissingInvocationInOrderCheckerTest.shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent

copy

Full Screen

...50 exception.expectMessage("mock.simpleMethod()");51 checkMissingInvocation(invocations, wanted, context);52 }53 @Test54 public void shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent() throws Exception {55 invocations = asList(buildIntArgMethod().arg(1111).toInvocation());56 wanted = buildIntArgMethod().arg(2222).toInvocationMatcher();57 exception.expect(ArgumentsAreDifferent.class);58 exception.expectMessage("Argument(s) are different! Wanted:");59 exception.expectMessage("mock.intArgumentMethod(2222);");60 exception.expectMessage("Actual invocation has different arguments:");61 exception.expectMessage("mock.intArgumentMethod(1111);");62 checkMissingInvocation(invocations, wanted, context);63 }64 @Test65 public void shouldReportWantedDiffersFromActual() throws Exception {66 Invocation invocation1 = buildIntArgMethod().arg(1111).toInvocation();67 Invocation invocation2 = buildIntArgMethod().arg(2222).toInvocation();68 context.markVerified(invocation2);...

Full Screen

Full Screen

shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1package org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers;2import org.junit.Test;3import org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent;4import org.mockito.exceptions.verification.NoInteractionsWanted;5import org.mockito.internal.invocation.InvocationBuilder;6import org.mockito.internal.invocation.InvocationMatcher;7import org.mockito.internal.verification.api.VerificationData;8import org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers.MissingInvocationInOrderChecker;9import org.mockito.invocation.Invocation;10import org.mockito.invocation.MatchableInvocation;11import org.mockito.verification.VerificationMode;12import org.mockitousage.IMethods;13import java.util.List;14import static java.util.Arrays.asList;15import static org.junit.Assert.fail;16import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;17import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;18import static org.mockito.Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions;19import static org.mockito.Mockito.verifyNoInteractions;20import static org.mockito.Mockito.withSettings;21import static org.mockito.exceptions.verification.junit.ArgumentsAreDifferent.NO_PARAMETERS_WERE_PASSED;22import static org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers.MissingInvocationInOrderCheckerTest.InvocationBuilderStubber.invocationBuilderStubber;23import static org.mockito.internal.verification.checkers.MissingInvocationInOrderCheckerTest.InvocationStubber.invocationStubber;24public class MissingInvocationInOrderCheckerTest {25 private final MissingInvocationInOrderChecker checker = new MissingInvocationInOrderChecker();26 private final VerificationData data = mock(VerificationData.class);27 private final VerificationMode mode = mock(VerificationMode.class);

Full Screen

Full Screen

shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1public boolean shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent() {2 Invocation actual = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("foo").toInvocation();3 Invocation expected = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("bar").toInvocation();4 boolean result = new MissingInvocationInOrderChecker().shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent(actual, expected);5 return result;6}7public void shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent() {8 Invocation actual = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("foo").toInvocation();9 Invocation expected = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("bar").toInvocation();10 boolean result = new MissingInvocationInOrderChecker().shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent(actual, expected);11 assertEquals(true, result);12}13public void shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent() {14 Invocation actual = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("foo").toInvocation();15 Invocation expected = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().withArgs("bar").toInvocation();16 boolean result = new MissingInvocationInOrderChecker().shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent(actual, expected);17 assertTrue(result);18}19public void shouldReportArgumentsAreDifferent() {20 Invocation actual = new InvocationBuilder().simpleMethod().with

Full Screen

Full Screen

StackOverFlow community discussions

Questions
Discussion

Logger with mockito in java

Mockito - returning the same object as passed into method

Using @MockBean in tests forces reloading of Application Context

How can I call the actual constructor of a mocked mockito object?

Can't return Class Object with Mockito

How to use reflection with Mockito mock objects

How do I enable Mockito debug messages?

Match generics with Mockito

Mockito NotaMockException

Mockito: Match any String except one

There are a couple of things you could do to improve your code:

  1. Switch to slf4j. This will allow you to code to an interface and be agnostic of the logging implementation under the covers (apache log4j in your case).

  2. Switching to slf4j will allow you to not have to concatenate strings when passing to the logging framework - example:

    • this statement: LOGGER.debug("The list already has {} entries" + list.size());
    • can be written like this: LOGGER.debug("The list already has {} entries", list.size());

This has the added benefit of making the place holder in the string literal actually work.

  1. You are attempting to assert and capture calls to an object indirectly via the the Logging framework. This will be fragile and error prone as you never know what calls will be made internally in the Logging framework. Mock only your direct dependencies.

  2. Don't test logging statements. It's not exactly visible behavior of the class and it makes the test fragile and complicated. Plus, treating the logging statements as you would say using an ArrayList (i.e. part of the language) allows them to be fully exercised AND they output info to the console that may be helpful in debugging a failing test. An example of being fragile is, if you change the logging statement to add more info or maybe you add another logging statement to the method, this test could break for no good reason. At the very least don't assert the number of times called as this will be extremely fragile.

All of that said, if you must test the interactions with the Logging framework - here is a modified version of your code that runs and provides the same functionality. This is basically option #3 from the list of improvements -

package com.spring.mockito;

import static org.mockito.Mockito.spy;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;

import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class AppTest {

    // create a mock of the logger
    @Mock
    private Logger logger;

    private App uut;

    // Not needed - dont test something that gets called through something else
    // @Captor
    // private ArgumentCaptor<LoggingEvent> captorLoggingEvent;

    @Before
    public void setup() {
        // spy the class under test so we can override the logger method to return our mock logger
        uut = spy(new App());
        when(uut.logger()).thenReturn(logger);

        // Not needed test with the mock directly.
        // Logger root = Logger.getRootLogger();
        // root.addAppender(mockAppender);
        // root.setLevel(Level.DEBUG);
    }

    /**
     * I want to test with over 3 elements.
     */
    @Test
    public void testWithOver3Element() {
        List<String> myList = Arrays.asList("value 1", "value 2", "value 3", "value 4");

        List<String> outputList = uut.addToListIfSizeIsUnder3(myList, "some value");

        Assert.assertEquals(4, outputList.size());
        Assert.assertFalse(myList.contains("some value"));
        verify(logger, times(1)).debug("The list already has {} entries4");

        // not needed
        // try {
        // verify(mockAppender, times(1)).doAppend(captorLoggingEvent.capture());
        // } catch (AssertionError e) {
        // e.printStackTrace();
        // }
        //
        // LoggingEvent loggingEvent = captorLoggingEvent.getAllValues().get(0);
        // Assert.assertEquals("The list already has {} entries", loggingEvent.getMessage());
        // Assert.assertEquals(Level.DEBUG, loggingEvent.getLevel());
    }

    public static class App {
        private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(App.class);

        public List<String> addToListIfSizeIsUnder3(final List<String> list, final String value) {
            if (list == null) {
                logger().error("A null list was passed in");
                return null;
            }
            if (list.size() < 3) {
                list.add(value);
            } else {
                // if you use slf4j this concatenation is not needed
                logger().debug("The list already has {} entries" + list.size());
            }
            return list;
        }

        // make a package private method for testing purposes to allow you to inject a mock
        Logger logger() {
            return LOGGER;
        }
    }
}

You can also look at packages like PowerMockito for mocking statics - but only if absolutely needed.

Hope this helps.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41793901/logger-with-mockito-in-java

Blogs

Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:

How To Run Cypress Tests In Azure DevOps Pipeline

When software developers took years to create and introduce new products to the market is long gone. Users (or consumers) today are more eager to use their favorite applications with the latest bells and whistles. However, users today don’t have the patience to work around bugs, errors, and design flaws. People have less self-control, and if your product or application doesn’t make life easier for users, they’ll leave for a better solution.

A Complete Guide To CSS Grid

Ever since the Internet was invented, web developers have searched for the most efficient ways to display content on web browsers.

How To Choose The Right Mobile App Testing Tools

Did you know that according to Statista, the number of smartphone users will reach 18.22 billion by 2025? Let’s face it, digital transformation is skyrocketing and will continue to do so. This swamps the mobile app development market with various options and gives rise to the need for the best mobile app testing tools

Top 22 Selenium Automation Testing Blogs To Look Out In 2020

If you are a web tester then somewhere down the road you will have to come across Selenium, an open-source test automation framework that has been on boom ever since its launch in 2004.

What Agile Testing (Actually) Is

So, now that the first installment of this two fold article has been published (hence you might have an idea of what Agile Testing is not in my opinion), I’ve started feeling the pressure to explain what Agile Testing actually means to me.

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.

LambdaTest Learning Hubs:

YouTube

You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.

Try LambdaTest Now !!

Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!

Next-Gen App & Browser Testing Cloud

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

NotHelpful