Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockito.internal.runners.util.TestMethodsFinderTest.shouldCreateRunnerInstance
shouldCreateRunnerInstance
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.mockito.internal.runners.util.TestMethodsFinder;2import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;3public class TestMethodsFinderTest {4 public static void main(String[] args) {5 TestMethodsFinder testMethodsFinder = new TestMethodsFinder();6 boolean isRunner = testMethodsFinder.shouldCreateRunnerInstance(MockitoJUnitRunner.class);7 System.out.println("isRunner: " + isRunner);8 }9}
shouldCreateRunnerInstance
Using AI Code Generation
1@Test public void shouldCreateRunnerInstance() throws Exception {2 TestMethodsFinder finder = mock(TestMethodsFinder.class);3 when(finder.getTestMethods(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(new ArrayList<Method>());4 TestMethodsFinderTest test = new TestMethodsFinderTest(finder);5 assertEquals(0, test.getTestMethods(TestMethodsFinderTest.class).size());6}7@Test public void shouldCreateRunnerInstance() throws Exception {8 TestMethodsFinder finder = mock(TestMethodsFinder.class);9 when(finder.getTestMethods(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(new ArrayList<Method>());10 TestMethodsFinderTest test = new TestMethodsFinderTest(finder);11 assertEquals(0, test.getTestMethods(TestMethodsFinderTest.class).size());12}13@Test public void shouldCreateRunnerInstance() throws Exception {14 TestMethodsFinder finder = mock(TestMethodsFinder.class);15 when(finder.getTestMethods(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(new ArrayList<Method>());16 TestMethodsFinderTest test = new TestMethodsFinderTest(finder);17 assertEquals(0, test.getTestMethods(TestMethodsFinderTest.class).size());18}19@Test public void shouldCreateRunnerInstance() throws Exception {20 TestMethodsFinder finder = mock(TestMethodsFinder.class);21 when(finder.getTestMethods(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(new ArrayList<Method>());22 TestMethodsFinderTest test = new TestMethodsFinderTest(finder);23 assertEquals(0, test.getTestMethods(TestMethodsFinderTest.class).size());24}25@Test public void shouldCreateRunnerInstance() throws Exception {26 TestMethodsFinder finder = mock(TestMethodsFinder.class);27 when(finder.getTestMethods(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(new ArrayList<Method>());28 TestMethodsFinderTest test = new TestMethodsFinderTest(finder);29 assertEquals(0, test.getTestMethods(TestMethodsFinder
How should I handle a UnnecessaryStubbingException that is sensitive to ordering in underlying data structures?
Checking consistency of multiple arguments using Mockito
What is the difference between mock() and stub() when using Mockito?
Can Mockito stub a method without regard to the argument?
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil
Spring Bean Injection Failing Due To Proxy
Why do I get an error "package org.mockito.runners does not exist"?
Bad <init> method call from inside of a branch
Mockito NullPointerException
Simulate CompletionException in a test
Lenient mocks are what you want, if you can't just use a real UserKeychain.
Mockito.lenient().when(userKeychain.getUserStatus()).thenReturn(UserState.OK);
Mockito.lenient().when(otherUserKeychain.getUserStatus()).thenReturn(UserState.SUSPENDED);
Mockito is designed to replace systems where you can't use the real system in your test, particularly in systems that predictably invoke services instead of getting properties from data objects (or other idempotent actions). Because your system doesn't call those methods in a deterministic order, and because the calls aren't expensive and don't have side effects, I would recommend just going with the "lenient" option.
Imagine this case instead, where you are testing deleting user 1001
:
when(userRpc.deleteUser(1001)).thenReturn(RPC_SUCCESS);
when(userRpc.deleteUser(1002)).thenReturn(RPC_SUCCESS); // unnecessary
The test might pass if you ever delete the wrong user: Over-stubbing has masked a problem. Compare with this:
when(userRpc.fetchExpensiveUserDetails(1001)).thenReturn(user1001);
when(userRpc.fetchExpensiveUserDetails(1002)).thenReturn(user1002); // unnecessary
Depending on what you're testing, this might be dangerous, but might not be so bad. Simulating a slow mobile network or with expensive data, maybe it is entirely against spec for you to fetch too much. However, in other cases, it may be acceptable. Finally, compare this case:
when(calculationResult.getRealComponent()).thenReturn(-1d);
when(calculationResult.getComplexComponent()).thenReturn(5);
when(calculationResult.getShortString()).thenReturn("-1 + 5i");
calculationResult
looks an awful lot like a data object, and it is probably not a critical part of your test which of your methods to call or whether you're calling all of them. This is a case where Mockito's strict stubbing hinders you rather than helping you, and might be a case where you want to make some of those stubbings lenient. You might also choose to make the entire mock lenient, which particularly makes sense if you were to create a test helper method like stubCalculationResult(-1, 5)
that prepared an entire object for you like that.
The only option better than that is to use a real object. In my example, if CalculationResult is an existing well-defined object, it may be lower risk overall to use a real one than to mock the behavior you believe at test-writing time to be correct. Similarly for your case, if you have access to a UserKeychain constructor that populates UserStatus etc, then it may be safer to use that in a test.
Though this might appear at first glance to be a slippery slope into turning a unit test into an integration test, I'd like to clarify that I'm recommending this only for data objects, which have no dependencies, and which ideally are immutable objects that have no methods with side-effects. If you use dependency injection, these are the type of single-implementation data holders that you would call new
on rather than getting from your graph. This is also a good reason to separate your data objects so they are immutable and easy to construct, and to shift your services to consume those objects rather than giving methods to the data objects (favoring loginService.login(user)
rather than user.login(loginService)
).
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Howdy testers! June has ended, and it’s time to give you a refresher on everything that happened at LambdaTest over the last month. We are thrilled to share that we are live with Cypress testing and that our very own LT Browser is free for all LambdaTest users. That’s not all, folks! We have also added a whole new range of browsers, devices & features to make testing more effortless than ever.
With the rising demand for new services and technologies in the IT, manufacturing, healthcare, and financial sector, QA/ DevOps engineering has become the most important part of software companies. Below is a list of some characteristics to look for when interviewing a potential candidate.
Joseph, who has been working as a Quality Engineer, was assigned to perform web automation for the company’s website.
Greetings folks! With the new year finally upon us, we’re excited to announce a collection of brand-new product updates. At LambdaTest, we strive to provide you with a comprehensive test orchestration and execution platform to ensure the ultimate web and mobile experience.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.