How to use testMultiLongArray method of org.mockito.internal.matchers.apachecommons.EqualsBuilderTest class

I will answer the question in two parts. First, yes it is code smell to mock or spy the class under test. That does not mean that it cannot be done correctly but that it is risk prone and should be avoided whenever possible.

WRT your specific example, I would see how the spy could be correctly used but that would be predicated on the assertion that you have elsewhere fully unit tested getStringMetadata. This then begs the question, if you have fully unit tested getStringMetadata elsewhere then you must know how to test it and therefore why not test getNumLines without the spy.

All this being said, millhouse makes a good point but either way you have to unit test the expensive code somewhere. His suggestion goes a long way to help isolate the expensive code and ensure that you only have to test / exercise it once.

I don't quite follow what problem you're having using Mockito. Assuming you create a mock of the interface that contains your myMethod() method, you can then verify only the parameters to the method that you are interested in. For example (assuming the interface is called MyInterface and using JUnit 4):

@Test
public void test() {
    MyInterface myInterface = mock(MyInterface.class);
    FooBar expectedFooBar = new FooBar();        

    // other testing stuff

    verify(myInterface).myMethod(any(), any(), eq(expectedFooBar), any(), ...);
}

You'll need to do a static import on the Mockito methods for this to work. The any() matcher doesn't care what value has been passed when verifying.

You can't avoid passing something for every argument in your method (even if it's only NULL).

Not possible through mockito. From their wiki

Why Mockito doesn't mock private methods?

Firstly, we are not dogmatic about mocking private methods. We just don't care about private methods because from the standpoint of testing private methods don't exist. Here are a couple of reasons Mockito doesn't mock private methods:

It requires hacking of classloaders that is never bullet proof and it changes the api (you must use custom test runner, annotate the class, etc.).

It is very easy to work around - just change the visibility of method from private to package-protected (or protected).

It requires me to spend time implementing & maintaining it. And it does not make sense given point #2 and a fact that it is already implemented in different tool (powermock).

Finally... Mocking private methods is a hint that there is something wrong with OO understanding. In OO you want objects (or roles) to collaborate, not methods. Forget about pascal & procedural code. Think in objects.

The article isn't very clear as it misses out the setup steps. By visiting the GitHub project linked in the article, you can see the full source code which explains those missing steps:

1) The code samples are extracted from a test class testing a specific activity. As part of the setup (i.e. in @Before), it replaces the Activity's reference to a GitHub API implementation with a mock one. It then calls the Activity's onCreate().

2) During onCreate(), the activity makes a call to the now-replaced GitHub API, passing in its Callback object.

Those first two steps explain why the Mockito.verify(mockApi).repositories(Mockito.anyString(), cb.capture()); step at the beginning of each test works. As the test is run after @Before, the mockApi has indeed had a call on its repositories() method.

The rest of the code is easier to understand once that's in place. As he's only created a mockApi, but not changed the actual Callback being used, the activity's content is changed. The rest of the code then verifies that those changes have taken place, either by checking a ListView or the Toasts.

So to answer your question, you need to:

1) At the start of your test method, replace the AuthAPI's loginService object with your mockApi object, then call AuthAPI.Login().

2) Use verify() as you already are to check that the function has been called.

3) Create a sample AuthObject and pass it to the cb.getValue().success() function.

4) Obtain the AuthObject from your Bus and assert that it is the same one you sent to the callback.success() function.

This tests that your AuthAPI.Login() correctly sends to your Bus the AuthObject that it would retrieve from Retrofit.

(I realise the SO question was written some time ago, but as I came across the same article and had the same confusion very recently, I thought this answer could be useful for others.)

An alternative to ArgumentMatcher is ArgumentCaptor.

Official example:

ArgumentCaptor<Person> argument = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Person.class);
verify(mock).doSomething(argument.capture());
assertEquals("John", argument.getValue().getName());

A captor can also be defined using the @Captor annotation:

@Captor ArgumentCaptor<Person> captor;
//... MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test public void test() {
    //...
    verify(mock).doSomething(captor.capture());
    assertEquals("John", captor.getValue().getName());
}

You can't do this with Mockito, but Apache Commons actually has a way to do this using one of its built in utilities. You can put this in a function in JUnit that is run after Mockito injects the rest of the mocks but before your test cases run, like this:

@InjectMocks
MyClass myClass;

@Before
public void before() throws Exception {
    FieldUtils.writeField(myClass, "fieldName", fieldValue, true);
}

HTTP Error 415 Unsupported media type - means that you send the data which is not supported by the service. In this case it means that you don't set the Content-Type header and actual content in the request. I suppose the JSON is expected content, so your call should look like this:

this.mockMvc.perform(post("/payment").contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
    .content("{\"json\":\"request to be send\"}"))
    .andExpect(status().isOk())
    .and_the_rest_of_validation_part

You're not passing the spy to when(). You're passing the original object.

Change the line

Mockito.spy(greeter);

to

greeter = Mockito.spy(greeter);

Mockito.spy() creates a spy object that is a copy of the original object. It doesn't modify the original object.

The point of Mockito (or any form of mocking, actually) isn't to mock the code you're checking, but to replace external dependencies with mocked code.

E.g., consider you have this trivial interface:

public interface ValueGenerator {
    int getValue();
}

And this is your code that uses it:

public class Incrementor {
    public int increment(ValueGenerator vg) {
        return vg.getValue() + 1;
    }
}

You want to test your Incrementor logic without depending on any specific implementation of ValueGenerator. That's where Mockito comes into play:

// Mock the dependencies:
ValueGenerator vgMock = Mockito.mock(ValueGenerator.class);
when(vgMock.getValue()).thenReturn(7);

// Test your code:
Incrementor inc = new Incrementor();
assertEquals(8, inc.increment(vgMock));