How to use sameToStringWithChar method of org.mockito.internal.matchers.MatchersToStringTest class

What is a Junit Extension

The purpose of Junit 5 extensions is to extend the behavior of test classes or methods

source

Read on Junit 5 Extension Model & @ExtendWith annotation :here

SpringExtension

SpringExtension integrates the Spring TestContext Framework into JUnit 5's Jupiter programming model.

public class SpringExtension
extends Object
implements BeforeAllCallback, AfterAllCallback, TestInstancePostProcessor, BeforeEachCallback, AfterEachCallback, BeforeTestExecutionCallback, AfterTestExecutionCallback, ParameterResolver{..}

MockitoExtension

This extension is the JUnit Jupiter equivalent of our JUnit4 MockitoJUnitRunner

public class MockitoExtension
extends java.lang.Object
implements BeforeEachCallback, AfterEachCallback, ParameterResolver{..}

As it can be seen , SpringExtension implements a lot more extensions than MockitoExtension.

Also @SpringBootTest is meta annotated with @ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class) and which means every time your tests are extended with SpringExtension. @MockBean is a Spring test framework annotation and used along with @ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)

To observe the difference try the following

ExtendWith only MockitoExtension

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class TestServiceTest {

    @MockBean
    TestService service;

    @Test
    void test() {
        assertNotNull(service); // Test will fail
    }

}

ExtendWith only SpringExtension

@ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
class TestServiceTest {

    @MockBean
    TestService service;

    @Test
    void test() {
        assertNotNull(service); // Test succeeds
    }

}

ExtendWith with both SpringExtension and MockitoExtension

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
@ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
class TestServiceTest {

    @MockBean
    TestService service;

    @Test
    void test() {
        assertNotNull(service); // Test succeeds
    }

}

Both works in your case because of the @SpringBootTest annotation for the test class as explained.

To answer the question : When to use @ExtendWith Spring or Mockito? ,

When the test requires a Spring Test Context ( to autowire a bean / use of @MockBean ) along with JUnit 5's Jupiter programming model use @ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class). This will support Mockito annotations as well through TestExecutionListeners.

When the test uses Mockito and needs JUnit 5's Jupiter programming model support use @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)

Hope this helps

This should work

import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;

verify(bar).DoStuff(any(Foo[].class));

I was able to completely answer my own question.

In this example an address with the Locality of Louisville is generated while the other fields look like "address.getStreet1();".

private Address createAddress(){
    Address address = mock(Address.class, new StringAnswer() );

    when(address.getLocality()).thenReturn("Louisville");

    ISOCountry isoCountry = mock(ISOCountry.class);
    when(isoCountry.getIsocode()).thenReturn("US");
    when(address.getCountry()).thenReturn(isoCountry);

    return address;
}

private class StringAnswer implements Answer<Object> {
    @Override
    public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
           if( invocation.getMethod().getReturnType().equals(String.class)){
               return invocation.toString();
           }
           else{
               return Mockito.RETURNS_DEFAULTS.answer(invocation);
           }
       }
}

If I was to test the code, I'd do the following.

Firstly, refactor the code so that the Socket isn't directly instantiated in the method you want to test. The example below shows the smallest change I can think of to make that happen. Future changes might factor out the Socket creation to a completely separate class, but I like small steps and I don't like making big changes on untested code.

public boolean sendTo(String hostname, int port) {
    boolean sent = false;

    try {
        Socket socket = createSocket();
        OutputStream out = socket.getOutputStream();
        out.write(payload);
        socket.close();
        sent = true;
    } catch (UnknownHostException e) {
        // TODO
    } catch (IOException e) {
        // TODO
    }

    return sent;
}

protected Socket createSocket() {
    return new Socket();
}

Now that the socket creation logic is outside of the method you are trying to test, you can start to mock things up and hook into the creation the socket.

public class MessageTest {
    @Test
    public void testSimplePayload() () {
        byte[] emptyPayload = new byte[1001];

        // Using Mockito
        final Socket socket = mock(Socket.class);
        final ByteArrayOutputStream byteArrayOutputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
        when(socket.getOutputStream()).thenReturn(byteArrayOutputStream);

        Message text = new Message(emptyPayload) {
            @Override
            protected Socket createSocket() {
                return socket;
            }
        };

        Assert.assertTrue("Message sent successfully", text.sendTo("localhost", "1234"));
        Assert.assertEquals("whatever you wanted to send".getBytes(), byteArrayOutputStream.toByteArray());
    }
}

Overriding individual methods on units you want to test is really useful for testing, especially in ugly code with horrible dependencies. Obviously the best solution is sorting out dependencies (in this case I would think that a Message not depend on a Socket, maybe there is a Messager interface as glowcoder suggests), but it's nice to move towards the solution in the smallest possible steps.

Since I didn't get any response here I asked on the Mockito forums. Here is a link to the discussion: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mockito/hWwcI5UHFi0/discussion

To summarize the answers, technically this would kind of defeat the purpose of mocking. You should really only mock the objects needed by the SystemUnderTest class. Mocking things within objects that are themselves mocks is kind of pointless.

If you really wanted to do it, @spy can help

Further reading has led me to try using ArgumentCaptors and the following works, although much more verbose than I would like.

ArgumentCaptor<String> argument = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(String.class);

verify(errors, atLeastOnce()).add(argument.capture(), any(ActionMessage.class));

List<String> values = argument.getAllValues();

assertTrue(values.contains("exception.message"));
assertTrue(values.contains("exception.detail"));

I think

Mockito.reset(wareHouseSpy)

would do it.

It sounds like you may want to be using the .expects(1) type methods that mock frameworks usually provide.

Using mockito, if you were testing a List and wanted to verify that clear was called 3 times and add was called at least once with these parameters you do the following:

List mock = mock(List.class);        
someCodeThatInteractsWithMock();                 

verify(mock, times(3)).clear();
verify(mock, atLeastOnce()).add(anyObject());      

Source - MockitoVsEasyMock

I think you do need to cast it, but it shouldn't be too bad:

Foo<Bar> mockFoo = (Foo<Bar>) mock(Foo.class);
when(mockFoo.getValue()).thenReturn(new Bar());