How to use writeReplace method of org.mockito.internal.invocation.mockref.MockStrongReference class

Here is what I did to test my code using Mockito and Apache HttpBuilder:

Class under test:

import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.IOException;

import javax.ws.rs.core.Response.Status;

import org.apache.http.HttpResponse;
import org.apache.http.client.HttpClient;
import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpGet;
import org.apache.http.impl.client.HttpClientBuilder;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

public class StatusApiClient {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(StatusApiClient.class);

    private String targetUrl = "";
    private HttpClient client = null;
    HttpGet httpGet = null;

    public StatusApiClient(HttpClient client, HttpGet httpGet) {
        this.client = client;
        this.httpGet = httpGet;
    }

    public StatusApiClient(String targetUrl) {
        this.targetUrl = targetUrl;
        this.client = HttpClientBuilder.create().build();
        this.httpGet = new HttpGet(targetUrl);
    }

    public boolean getStatus() {
        BufferedReader rd = null;
        boolean status = false;
        try{
            LOG.debug("Requesting status: " + targetUrl);


            HttpResponse response = client.execute(httpGet);

            if(response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode() == Status.OK.getStatusCode()) {
                LOG.debug("Is online.");
                status = true;
            }

        } catch(Exception e) {
            LOG.error("Error getting the status", e);
        } finally {
            if (rd != null) {
                try{
                    rd.close();
                } catch (IOException ioe) {
                    LOG.error("Error while closing the Buffered Reader used for reading the status", ioe);
                }
            }   
        }

        return status;
    }
}

Test:

import java.io.IOException;

import org.apache.http.HttpResponse;
import org.apache.http.StatusLine;
import org.apache.http.client.ClientProtocolException;
import org.apache.http.client.HttpClient;
import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpGet;
import org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.mockito.Mockito;

public class StatusApiClientTest extends Mockito {

    @Test
    public void should_return_true_if_the_status_api_works_properly() throws ClientProtocolException, IOException {
        //given:
        HttpClient httpClient = mock(HttpClient.class);
        HttpGet httpGet = mock(HttpGet.class);
        HttpResponse httpResponse = mock(HttpResponse.class);
        StatusLine statusLine = mock(StatusLine.class);

        //and:
        when(statusLine.getStatusCode()).thenReturn(200);
        when(httpResponse.getStatusLine()).thenReturn(statusLine);
        when(httpClient.execute(httpGet)).thenReturn(httpResponse);

        //and:
        StatusApiClient client = new StatusApiClient(httpClient, httpGet);

        //when:
        boolean status = client.getStatus();

        //then:
        Assert.assertTrue(status);
    }

    @Test
    public void should_return_false_if_status_api_do_not_respond() throws ClientProtocolException, IOException {
        //given:
        HttpClient httpClient = mock(HttpClient.class);
        HttpGet httpGet = mock(HttpGet.class);
        HttpResponse httpResponse = mock(HttpResponse.class);
        StatusLine statusLine = mock(StatusLine.class);

        //and:
        when(httpClient.execute(httpGet)).thenThrow(HttpHostConnectException.class);

        //and:
        StatusApiClient client = new StatusApiClient(httpClient, httpGet);

        //when:
        boolean status = client.getStatus();

        //then:
        Assert.assertFalse(status);
    }

}

What do you think folks, do I need to improve something? (Yeah, I know, the comments. That is something I brought from my Spock background :D)

Mockito 2 now supports final classes and methods!

But for now that's an "incubating" feature. It requires some steps to activate it which are described in What's New in Mockito 2:

Mocking of final classes and methods is an incubating, opt-in feature. It uses a combination of Java agent instrumentation and subclassing in order to enable mockability of these types. As this works differently to our current mechanism and this one has different limitations and as we want to gather experience and user feedback, this feature had to be explicitly activated to be available ; it can be done via the mockito extension mechanism by creating the file src/test/resources/mockito-extensions/org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker containing a single line:

mock-maker-inline

After you created this file, Mockito will automatically use this new engine and one can do :

 final class FinalClass {
   final String finalMethod() { return "something"; }
 }

 FinalClass concrete = new FinalClass(); 

 FinalClass mock = mock(FinalClass.class);
 given(mock.finalMethod()).willReturn("not anymore");

 assertThat(mock.finalMethod()).isNotEqualTo(concrete.finalMethod());

In subsequent milestones, the team will bring a programmatic way of using this feature. We will identify and provide support for all unmockable scenarios. Stay tuned and please let us know what you think of this feature!

Update July 29, 2015 by @durron597: This excellent answer was correct in 2013, however it has since been rendered obsolete by an update to Mockito. See this answer.

I use latest JUnit with Mockito core dependency and hamcrest 1.3 in many Maven projects at work. Till now nobody reported any problem with this. So if this works for your tests go with the newest Version for all three. Just ensure to use mockito core instead of all.

So I would recommend to go with option 2 to have all benefits of the newer versions. If you are really in doubt that anything could go wrong use option 4 which is the safest one. But of course you could go with option 2 and when in the near future anything would be wrong you could switch to option 2. Or since then a newer mockito is already out there solving this.

Note from mockito Issue 397: This problem does not appear with mockito-core.

Take a look at this reference in the official API. You want to reverse the way your call is made and adjust the argument too, since this is a void method that you expect to throw an exception.

doThrow(new ContentIOException()).when(StubbedObject).putContent(contentStream);

It looks like you're mocking out the only call you're making to production code.

In other words, your test says:

• When I call saveData(), fake the result to return true
• Now call saveData() - yay, the result was true!

None of your production code is being calls at all, as far as I can see.

The point of mocking is to mock out dependencies from your production class, or (sometimes, though I prefer not to) to mock out some methods of your production class that the code you're actually testing will call.

You should probably be mocking out the dependencies of Leaderboard rather than Leaderboard itself. If you must mock out saveData(), you should be testing the methods that call saveData()... check that they save the right data, that they act correctly when saveData() returns false, etc.

No, there isn't. PostConstruct is a Spring concept. But nothing forbids you to call it in your setup method:

@Before
public void prepare() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
    this.b.postConstruct();
}

As Lucas says, JSON is bundled up with the Android SDK, so you are working with a stub.

The current solution is to pull JSON from Maven Central like this:

dependencies {
    ...
    testImplementation 'org.json:json:20210307'
}

You can replace the version 20210307 with the the latest one depending on the Android API. It is not known which version of the maven artefact corresponds exactly/most closely to what ships with Android.

Alternatively, you can download and include the jar:

dependencies {
    ...
    testImplementation files('libs/json.jar')
}

Note that you also need to use Android Studio 1.1 or higher and at least build tools version 22.0.0 or above for this to work.

Related issue: #179461

It looks like you both want to mock what happens when userService.getUserById() is called, and also verify that setPasswordChangeRequired(true) is called on that returned object.

You can accomplish this with something like:

UserService userService = mock(UserService.class);
User user = mock(User.class);
when(userService.getUserById(anyLong())).thenReturn(user);

...

// invoke the method being tested

...

verify(user).setPasswordChangeRequired(true);

Solution 1 : add a caller function in the calling class

public class DummyWrapper {
val foo get() = DummyCompanion.Companion

public void callAStaticMethod(){
    foo.staticMechod();
}

public void callCompanionMethod(){
    foo.someCompanionMethod();
}
}

In the test class, we can use Mockito to provide a stub for the get() function and verified it is called.

@Test
fun testCase{
....
val mockCompanionObj: DummyCompanion.Companion = mock()
val wrapper = DummyWrapper()

whenever(wrapper.foo).thenReturn(mockCompanionObj)
wrapper.callCompanionMethod()
verify(mockCompanionObj).someCompanionMethod()
....
}

Solution 2: using Mockk Mocking companion object in Mockk is easy. There is no need to insert a test interfacing object in the source code.

 @Test
 fun testCompanionObject() {
    //Mock the companion object
    mockkObject(DummyCompanion.Companion)

    //define the stubbing bechavior of a companion object method
    every { DummyCompanion.Companion.companionMethod() } answers { stubMethod() }

    val testObject = DummyWrapper()

    //Call a method that calls the companion object method
    //You can verify stubMethod() is called
    testObject.callCompanionMethod()

    verify(exactly = 1) { DummyCompanion.someCompanionMethod() }
}

For details see Mockk