How to use shouldNotBeEqualForSameMethodFromTwoDifferentClasses method of org.mockito.internal.invocation.InvocationsFinderTest class

I suggest to use Mockito Framework it is very easy to use and understand.

@Mock
private EntityManager entityManager; 

If you want to use any method that belongs to entityManager, you should call.

Mockito.when(METHOD_EXPECTED_TO_BE_CALLED).thenReturn(AnyObjectoftheReturnType);

When you run your test, any call previosly declared in the Mockito.when for the EntityManager will return the value put in the declaration..

Read full documentation here.

https://static.javadoc.io/org.mockito/mockito-core/2.12.0/org/mockito/Mockito.html#stubbing

Plain Mockito library

import org.mockito.Mock;
...
@Mock
MyService myservice;

and

import org.mockito.Mockito;
...
MyService myservice = Mockito.mock(MyService.class);

come from the Mockito library and are functionally equivalent.
They allow to mock a class or an interface and to record and verify behaviors on it.

The way using annotation is shorter, so preferable and often preferred.

---

Note that to enable Mockito annotations during test executions, the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this) static method has to be called.
To avoid side effect between tests, it is advised to do it before each test execution :

@Before 
public void initMocks() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}

Another way to enable Mockito annotations is annotating the test class with @RunWith by specifying the MockitoJUnitRunner that does this task and also other useful things :

@RunWith(org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public MyClassTest{...}

---

Spring Boot library wrapping Mockito library

This is indeed a Spring Boot class:

import org.springframework.boot.test.mock.mockito.MockBean;
...
@MockBean
MyService myservice;

The class is included in the spring-boot-test library.

It allows to add Mockito mocks in a Spring ApplicationContext.
If a bean, compatible with the declared class exists in the context, it replaces it by the mock.
If it is not the case, it adds the mock in the context as a bean.

Javadoc reference :

Annotation that can be used to add mocks to a Spring ApplicationContext.

...

If any existing single bean of the same type defined in the context will be replaced by the mock, if no existing bean is defined a new one will be added.

---

When use classic/plain Mockito and when use @MockBean from Spring Boot ?

Unit tests are designed to test a component in isolation from other components and unit tests have also a requirement : being as fast as possible in terms of execution time as these tests may be executed each day dozen times on the developer machines.

Consequently, here is a simple guideline :

As you write a test that doesn't need any dependencies from the Spring Boot container, the classic/plain Mockito is the way to follow : it is fast and favors the isolation of the tested component.
If your test needs to rely on the Spring Boot container and you want also to add or mock one of the container beans : @MockBean from Spring Boot is the way.

---

Typical usage of Spring Boot @MockBean

As we write a test class annotated with @WebMvcTest (web test slice).

The Spring Boot documentation summarizes that very well :

Often @WebMvcTest will be limited to a single controller and used in combination with @MockBean to provide mock implementations for required collaborators.

Here is an example :

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.web.servlet.WebMvcTest;
import org.springframework.boot.test.mock.mockito.MockBean;
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringRunner;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc;

import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.request.MockMvcRequestBuilders.*;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.*;

@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
@WebMvcTest(FooController.class)
public class FooControllerTest {

    @Autowired
    private MockMvc mvc;

    @MockBean
    private FooService fooServiceMock;

    @Test
    public void testExample() throws Exception {
         Foo mockedFoo = new Foo("one", "two");

         Mockito.when(fooServiceMock.get(1))
                .thenReturn(mockedFoo);

         mvc.perform(get("foos/1")
            .accept(MediaType.TEXT_PLAIN))
            .andExpect(status().isOk())
            .andExpect(content().string("one two"));
    }

}

I don't quite follow what problem you're having using Mockito. Assuming you create a mock of the interface that contains your myMethod() method, you can then verify only the parameters to the method that you are interested in. For example (assuming the interface is called MyInterface and using JUnit 4):

@Test
public void test() {
    MyInterface myInterface = mock(MyInterface.class);
    FooBar expectedFooBar = new FooBar();        

    // other testing stuff

    verify(myInterface).myMethod(any(), any(), eq(expectedFooBar), any(), ...);
}

You'll need to do a static import on the Mockito methods for this to work. The any() matcher doesn't care what value has been passed when verifying.

You can't avoid passing something for every argument in your method (even if it's only NULL).

I recommend using Mockito's Hamcrest integration to write a good, clean matcher for it. That allows you to combine the verification with detailed checking of the passed argument:

import static org.mockito.hamcrest.MockitoHamcrest.argThat;

verify(mock, times(1)).someMethod(argThat(personNamed("Bob")));

Matcher<Person> personNamed(final String name) {
    return new TypeSafeMatcher<Person>() {
        public boolean matchesSafely(Person item) {
            return name.equals(item.getName());
        }
        public void describeTo(Description description) {
            description.appendText("a Person named " + name);
        }
    };
}

Matchers generally lead to more readable tests and more useful test failure messages. They also tend to be very reusable, and you'll find yourself building up a library of them tailored for testing your project. Finally, you can also use them for normal test assertions using JUnit's Assert.assertThat(), so you get double use out of them.

For the mocks initialization, using the runner or the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks are strictly equivalent solutions. From the javadoc of the MockitoJUnitRunner :

JUnit 4.5 runner initializes mocks annotated with Mock, so that explicit usage of MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(Object) is not necessary. Mocks are initialized before each test method.

---

The first solution (with the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks) could be used when you have already configured a specific runner (SpringJUnit4ClassRunner for example) on your test case.

The second solution (with the MockitoJUnitRunner) is the more classic and my favorite. The code is simpler. Using a runner provides the great advantage of automatic validation of framework usage (described by @David Wallace in this answer).

Both solutions allows to share the mocks (and spies) between the test methods. Coupled with the @InjectMocks, they allow to write unit tests very quickly. The boilerplate mocking code is reduced, the tests are easier to read. For example:

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock(name = "database") private ArticleDatabase dbMock;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @InjectMocks private ArticleManager manager;

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        manager.initiateArticle();
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        manager.finishArticle();
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: The code is minimal

Cons: Black magic. IMO it is mainly due to the @InjectMocks annotation. With this annotation "you loose the pain of code" (see the great comments of @Brice)

---

The third solution is to create your mock on each test method. It allow as explained by @mlk in its answer to have "self contained test".

public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (BDD...)

Cons: there is more boilerplate code. (The mocks creation)

---

My recommandation is a compromise. Use the @Mock annotation with the @RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class), but do not use the @InjectMocks :

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock private ArticleDatabase database;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (How my ArticleManager is instantiated). No boilerplate code.

Cons: The test is not self contained, less pain of code

They both achieve the same result. Using an annotation (@Mock) is usually considered "cleaner", as you don't fill up your code with boilerplate assignments that all look the same.

Note that in order to use the @Mock annotation, your test class should be annotated with @RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class) or contain a call to MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this) in its @Before method.

Question might be a bit old but I will put an answer in case someone stumbles across.

• I'm using Mockito and JUnit.
• AccountRepository is a plain spring data repository extending JPARepository.
• Account is a plain JPA entity.

To test your services and mock Spring Data repositories, you need something like below.

package foo.bar.service.impl;

import foo.bar.data.entity.Account;
import foo.bar.data.repository.AccountRepository;
import foo.bar.service.AccountService;

import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class AccountServiceImplTest {

    @Mock
    private static AccountRepository accountRepository;

    @InjectMocks
    private static AccountService accountService = new AccountServiceImpl();

    private Account account;

    @Test
    public void testFindAccount() {

        Integer accountId = new Integer(1);

        account = new Account();
        account.setId(accountId);
        account.setName("Account name");
        account.setCode("Accont code");
        account.setDescription("Account description");

        Mockito.when(accountRepository.findOne(accountId)).thenReturn(account);

        Account retrivedAccount = accountService.findAccount(accountId);

        Assert.assertEquals(account, retrivedAccount);

    }

}

I found the answer on my own. I need to add

@InjectMocks
private ResourceManager resourceManager;

Then I need to run the test with this instance:

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ResourceManagerTest
{
    @Mock
    private JerseyClient jerseyClient;

    @InjectMocks
    private ResourceManager resourceManager;

    @Test
    public void testResultHandling() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException, ResourceException
    {
        TestEntity testEntity = new TestEntity();

        testEntity.setGet(true);
        testEntity.setTestAttribute("1stTest");

        when(jerseyClient.get(anyString())).thenReturn("{\"get\":true,\"testAttribute\":\"2ndTest\",\"message\":\"success\"}");   

        TestEntity result = (TestEntity)resourceManager.execute(testEntity, TestEntity.class);

        assertThat(result, is(notNullValue()));
        assertThat(result.getMessage(), is("success"));
        assertThat(result.getTestAttribute(), is("2ndTest"));
    }
}

And I can also use the "doReturn...when" pattern.

Try to use Mockito or Easymock for mocking service calls. You need to mock only these methods which are actually used - no need to mock every method. You can creat mock object for WebResource class, then mock accept method call.

In @BeforeClass/@Before JUnit test method write something like (Mockito example)

WebResource res = mock(WebResource.class);
when(res.accept(something)).thenReturn(thatWhatYouWant);

Then in your tests you can use res object as if it was real object and call mock method on it. Instead of returning value you can also throw exceptions. Mockito is pretty cool.