Best Mockito code snippet using org.mockito.internal.exceptions.Reporter.inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock
Source: InOrderImpl.java
2 * Copyright (c) 2007 Mockito contributors3 * This program is made available under the terms of the MIT License.4 */5package org.mockito.internal;6import static org.mockito.internal.exceptions.Reporter.inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock;7import java.util.ArrayList;8import java.util.List;9import org.mockito.InOrder;10import org.mockito.MockingDetails;11import org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException;12import org.mockito.internal.verification.InOrderContextImpl;13import org.mockito.internal.verification.InOrderWrapper;14import org.mockito.internal.verification.VerificationModeFactory;15import org.mockito.internal.verification.VerificationWrapper;16import org.mockito.internal.verification.VerificationWrapperInOrderWrapper;17import org.mockito.internal.verification.api.InOrderContext;18import org.mockito.internal.verification.api.VerificationInOrderMode;19import org.mockito.invocation.Invocation;20import org.mockito.verification.VerificationMode;21import static org.mockito.Mockito.mockingDetails;22import static org.mockito.internal.exceptions.Reporter.*;23/**24 * Allows verifying in order. This class should not be exposed, hence default access.25 */26public class InOrderImpl implements InOrder, InOrderContext {27 private final MockitoCore mockitoCore = new MockitoCore();28 private final List<Object> mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder = new ArrayList<>();29 private final InOrderContext inOrderContext = new InOrderContextImpl();30 public List<Object> getMocksToBeVerifiedInOrder() {31 return mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder;32 }33 public InOrderImpl(List<?> mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder) {34 this.mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder.addAll(mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder);35 }36 @Override37 public <T> T verify(T mock) {38 return this.verify(mock, VerificationModeFactory.times(1));39 }40 @Override41 public <T> T verify(T mock, VerificationMode mode) {42 if (mock == null) {43 throw nullPassedToVerify();44 }45 MockingDetails mockingDetails = mockingDetails(mock);46 if (!mockingDetails.isMock()) {47 throw notAMockPassedToVerify(mock.getClass());48 }49 if (!this.objectIsMockToBeVerified(mock)) {50 throw inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock();51 }52 if (mode instanceof VerificationWrapper) {53 return mockitoCore.verify(54 mock, new VerificationWrapperInOrderWrapper((VerificationWrapper) mode, this));55 } else if (!(mode instanceof VerificationInOrderMode)) {56 throw new MockitoException(57 mode.getClass().getSimpleName() + " is not implemented to work with InOrder");58 }59 return mockitoCore.verify(mock, new InOrderWrapper((VerificationInOrderMode) mode, this));60 }61 // We can't use `this.mocksToBeVerifiedInOrder.contains`, since that in turn calls `.equals` on62 // the mock. Since mocks can be spies and spies get their real equals method calls called, the63 // result is that Mockito incorrectly would register an invocation on a mock. This normally64 // wouldn't be a problem, unless the user explicitly verifies that no interactions are performed...
inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock
Using AI Code Generation
1 public void test() {2 Reporter reporter = new Reporter();3 reporter.inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock();4 }5}6 public void test() {7 Reporter reporter = new Reporter();8 reporter.inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock();9 }10}11public void test() {12 String s = "Test";13 String returnedString = TestClass.test(s);14 assertEquals(s, returnedString);15}16@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)17@PrepareForTest(TestClass.class)18public class TestClassTest {19 public void test() {20 String s = "Test";21 String returnedString = TestClass.test(s);22 assertEquals(s, returnedString);23 }24}25@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)26@PrepareForTest(TestClass.class)27public class TestClassTest {28 public void test() {29 String s = "Test";30 String returnedString = TestClass.test(s);31 assertEquals(s, returnedString);32 }33}34@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)35@PrepareForTest(TestClass.class)36public class TestClassTest {37 public void test() {38 String s = "Test";39 String returnedString = TestClass.test(s);40 assertEquals(s, returnedString);41 }42}43@RunWith(Power
inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock
Using AI Code Generation
1public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {2 throw new MockitoException(join(3 "to createInOrder() method"));4}5public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {6 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");7}8public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {9 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");10}11public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {12 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");13}14public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {15 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");16}17public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {18 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");19}20public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {21 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");22}23public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {24 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");25}26public static void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {27 throw new MockitoException("You have to pass mocks that were created in the same order to createInOrder() method");
inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock
Using AI Code Generation
1 public void inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() {2 Set<MockCreationSettings> mocks = new LinkedHashSet<MockCreationSettings>();3 for (MockCreationSettings mock : mocks) {4 if (!mock.isFamiliar()) {5 mocks.add(mock);6 }7 }8 if (!mocks.isEmpty()) {9 Mockito.mockingDetails(mocks.iterator().next()).getInOrderContext().validateState();10 }11 }12 public void test() {13 List<String> mockedList = mock(List.class);14 List<String> anotherMockedList = mock(List.class);15 InOrder inOrder = inOrder(mockedList, anotherMockedList);16 inOrder.verify(mockedList).add("was added first");17 inOrder.verify(anotherMockedList).add("was added second");18 }19}20-> at com.test.mockito.MockitoTest.test(MockitoTest.java:25)
inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils;2import org.apache.commons.io.LineIterator;3import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;4import org.apache.commons.lang3.text.StrBuilder;5import org.junit.Test;6import java.io.File;7import java.io.IOException;8import java.util.ArrayList;9import java.util.List;10import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;11import static org.junit.Assert.fail;12public class InOrderRequiresFamiliarMockTest {13 public void testInOrderRequiresFamiliarMock() throws IOException {14 List<String> lines = FileUtils.readLines(new File("C:\\Users\\soumya\\Desktop\\inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock.txt"));15 List<String> classes = new ArrayList<>();16 for (String line : lines) {17 if (line.contains("package")) {18 String packageName = line.split(" ")[1];19 classes.add(packageName);20 }21 }22 String classUnderTest = "org.mockito.internal.exceptions.Reporter";23 String expectedMessage = "In order to create in order verifier you need to pass at least 1 familiar mock (mocks that were passed in verify() method).";24 String actualMessage = "In order to create in order verifier you need to pass at least 1 familiar mock (mocks that were passed in verify() method).";25 for (String className : classes) {26 if (className.contains(classUnderTest)) {27 continue;28 }29 String[] classNameParts = className.split("\\.");30 String classNameToTest = classNameParts[classNameParts.length - 1];31 actualMessage = InOrderRequiresFamiliarMock.inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock(classNameToTest, classUnderTest);32 if (StringUtils.isNotEmpty(actualMessage)) {33 fail(actualMessage);34 }35 }36 assertEquals(expectedMessage, actualMessage);37 }38}39package org.mockito.internal.exceptions;40import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;41import org.apache.commons.lang3.text.StrBuilder;42public class InOrderRequiresFamiliarMock {43 public static String inOrderRequiresFamiliarMock(String classNameToTest, String classUnderTest) {44 StrBuilder sb = new StrBuilder();45 sb.append("import ").append(classUnderTest).append(";46");47 sb.append("import org.junit.Test;48");49 sb.append("import static org.junit.Assert.fail;50");51 sb.append("public class ").append(classNameToTest).append(" {
Testing Private method using mockito
Do Mock objects get reset for each test?
Software Testing Tools - for java
Use Mockito to Stub methods in the same class as the class under test (CUT)
mockito: Is there a way of capturing the return value of stubbed method?
Mockito - returning the same object as passed into method
How to properly match varargs in Mockito
Mocking static methods with Mockito
How to handle mocked RxJava2 observable throwing exception in unit test
Mockito: how to stub getter setter
Not possible through mockito. From their wiki
Why Mockito doesn't mock private methods?
Firstly, we are not dogmatic about mocking private methods. We just don't care about private methods because from the standpoint of testing private methods don't exist. Here are a couple of reasons Mockito doesn't mock private methods:
It requires hacking of classloaders that is never bullet proof and it changes the api (you must use custom test runner, annotate the class, etc.).
It is very easy to work around - just change the visibility of method from private to package-protected (or protected).
It requires me to spend time implementing & maintaining it. And it does not make sense given point #2 and a fact that it is already implemented in different tool (powermock).
Finally... Mocking private methods is a hint that there is something wrong with OO understanding. In OO you want objects (or roles) to collaborate, not methods. Forget about pascal & procedural code. Think in objects.
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
The QA testing profession requires both educational and long-term or experience-based learning. One can learn the basics from certification courses and exams, boot camp courses, and college-level courses where available. However, developing instinctive and practical skills works best when built with work experience.
The purpose of developing test cases is to ensure the application functions as expected for the customer. Test cases provide basic application documentation for every function, feature, and integrated connection. Test case development often detects defects in the design or missing requirements early in the development process. Additionally, well-written test cases provide internal documentation for all application processing. Test case development is an important part of determining software quality and keeping defects away from customers.
So, now that the first installment of this two fold article has been published (hence you might have an idea of what Agile Testing is not in my opinion), I’ve started feeling the pressure to explain what Agile Testing actually means to me.
Sometimes, in our test code, we need to handle actions that apparently could not be done automatically. For example, some mouse actions such as context click, double click, drag and drop, mouse movements, and some special key down and key up actions. These specific actions could be crucial depending on the project context.
Have you ever struggled with handling hidden elements while automating a web or mobile application? I was recently automating an eCommerce application. I struggled with handling hidden elements on the web page.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!