How to use getAnnotationEngine method of org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.Plugins class

I wouldn't use exceptions to test that, but verifications. And another problem is that you can't use when() with methods returning void.

Here's how I would do it:

FizzConfigurator fixture = Mockito.spy(new FizzConfigurator());
doNothing().when(fixture).doWidget(Mockito.anyString(), Mockito.<Config>any()));
fixture.doBuzz("some string");
Mockito.verify(fixture).doWidget("some string", Config.SOMETIMES);

Two more ways to do it (see my comment on the previous answer by @Tomasz Nurkiewicz):

The first relies on the fact that the compiler simply won't let you pass in something of the wrong type:

when(a.method(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(b);

You lose the exact typing (the Class<? extends A>) but it probably works as you need it to.

The second is a lot more involved but is arguably a better solution if you really want to be sure that the argument to method() is an A or a subclass of A:

when(a.method(Matchers.argThat(new ClassOrSubclassMatcher<A>(A.class)))).thenReturn(b);

Where ClassOrSubclassMatcher is an org.hamcrest.BaseMatcher defined as:

public class ClassOrSubclassMatcher<T> extends BaseMatcher<Class<T>> {

    private final Class<T> targetClass;

    public ClassOrSubclassMatcher(Class<T> targetClass) {
        this.targetClass = targetClass;
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public boolean matches(Object obj) {
        if (obj != null) {
            if (obj instanceof Class) {
                return targetClass.isAssignableFrom((Class<T>) obj);
            }
        }
        return false;
    }

    public void describeTo(Description desc) {
        desc.appendText("Matches a class or subclass");
    }       
}

Phew! I'd go with the first option until you really need to get finer control over what method() actually returns :-)

I wonder why you want to test, what method your method under tests invoke. Sounds pretty much like whitebox testing to me.

In my opinion, you want to verify the outcome of the invocation and not the way to get there, as this might easily change (i.e. when refactoring).

So if the outcome of doSecond() is the same as doFirst() you could write a test for doFirst() and use the same test (i.e. set of assertions) for testing doSecond().

But if you really want to test, whether doFirst() has been invoked by doSecond() you could wrap your service in a spy and then call the verification on the spy:

//given
SomeService service = new SomeService();
SomeService spy = Mockito.spy(service);
//when
spy.doSecond();
//then
verify(spy).doFirst();

This comes down to the implementation of the spy. According to the docs, the Spy is created as a copy of the real instance:

Mockito does not delegate calls to the passed real instance, instead it actually creates a copy of it. So if you keep the real instance and interact with it, don't expect the spied to be aware of those interaction and their effect on real instance state. The corollary is that when an unstubbed method is called on the spy but not on the real instance, you won't see any effects on the real instance.

It seems to be a shallow copy. As a result, as far as my debugging shows, the CacheLoader is shared between the copy and the original object, but its reference to its enclosing object is the original object, not the spy. Therefore the real retrieveValue is called instead of the mocked one.

I'm not sure offhand what the best way to resolve this would be. One way for this specific example would be to invert the CacheLoader dependency (i.e. pass it into Subject instead of Subject defining it internally), and mock that instead of Subject.

There is no real need for @Mock in Spock, because there is already = Mock(), which can be used everywhere an annotation can be used (and also in other places). There is an open pull request for @InjectMocks, but it hasn't been decided if such a feature will make it into spock-core or spock-guice. (Shipping this feature with spock-guice, or at least requiring Guice on the class path, would allow to delegate injection to Guice, rather than reinventing the wheel.) If not, @InjectMocks could always be shipped as a third-party Spock extension.

You want to test this differently. You need to verify that your inputs caused the expected outputs. For non-mock results, you would assert the behavior. Since you want to verify that your outputs were set properly.

import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;

public class MyServletTests {
    @Test
    public void testValidRequest() throws Exception {
        HttpServletRequest request = mock(HttpServletRequest.class);
        HttpServletResponse response = mock(HttpServletResponse.class);

        when(request.getParameter("test")).thenReturn("1");

        new MyServlet().doPost(request, response);

        // ensure that the request was used as expected
        verify(request).getParameter("test");

        // ensure that the response was setup as expected based on the
        //  mocked inputs
        verify(response).setContentType("text/html");
        verify(response).setStatus(200);
    }
 }

If you expect something to not be touched given certain inputs, then you should consider verifying that behavior using verify(response, never()).shouldNotBeCalledButSometimesIs() (to verify when conditions control it being called/set versus not).

As you pointed out, it is not possible to mock static methods with Mockito and since you do not wanna use Powermock or other tools, you can try something as follows in your tests.

1. Create test authentication object

   Authentication auth = new ... // create instance based on your needs and with required attributes or just mock it if you do not care

2. Mock security context

   SecurityContext context = mock(SecurityContext.class);

3. Ensure your mock returns the respective authentication

   when(context.getAuthentication()).thenReturn(auth);

4. Set security context into holder

   SecurityContextHolder.setContext(securityContext);

Now every call to SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication() should return authentication object created in step 1.

Use the doReturn-when alternate stubbing syntax.

System under test:

public class MyClass {
  Set<? extends Number> getSet() {
    return new HashSet<Integer>();
  }
}

and the test case:

import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;

import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;

import org.junit.Test;

public class TestMyClass {
  @Test
  public void testGetSet() {
    final MyClass mockInstance = mock(MyClass.class);

    final Set<Integer> resultSet = new HashSet<Integer>();
    resultSet.add(1);
    resultSet.add(2);
    resultSet.add(3);

    doReturn(resultSet).when(mockInstance).getSet();

    System.out.println(mockInstance.getSet());
  }
}

No errors or warning suppression needed

I think it requires more custom work.

verify(row, new LastCall()).saveToDatabase();

and then

public class LastCall implements VerificationMode {
    public void verify(VerificationData data) {
        List<Invocation> invocations = data.getAllInvocations();
        InvocationMatcher matcher = data.getWanted();
        Invocation invocation = invocations.get(invocations.size() - 1);
        if (!matcher.matches(invocation)) throw new MockitoException("...");
    }
}

Previous Answer:

You are right. verifyNoMoreInteractions is what you need.

verify(row).setSomething(value);
verify(row).setSomethingElse(anotherValue);
verify(row).editABunchMoreStuff();
verify(row).saveToDatabase();
verifyNoMoreInteractions(row);