How to use shouldStartingMockSettingsContainDefaultBehavior method of org.mockito.MockitoTest class

PowerMock implements its own MockMaker which leads to incompatibility with Mockito mock-maker-inline, even if PowerMock is just added as a dependency and not used. If two org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker exist in path then any only one can be used, which one is undetermined.

PowerMock can however delegate calls to another MockMaker, and for then tests are run without PowerMock. Since PowerMock 1.7.0 this can be configured with using the PowerMock Configuration.

The MockMaker can be configured by creating the file org/powermock/extensions/configuration.properties and setting:

mockito.mock-maker-class=mock-maker-inline

Example of using Mockito mock-maker-inline with PowerMock: https://github.com/powermock/powermock-examples-maven/tree/master/mockito2

Since I didn't get any response here I asked on the Mockito forums. Here is a link to the discussion: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mockito/hWwcI5UHFi0/discussion

To summarize the answers, technically this would kind of defeat the purpose of mocking. You should really only mock the objects needed by the SystemUnderTest class. Mocking things within objects that are themselves mocks is kind of pointless.

If you really wanted to do it, @spy can help

It should be something like

@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
public class aTest () {

    @Mock
    private B b;

    @Mock
    private C c;

    @Autowired
    @InjectMocks
    private A a;

}

If you want D to be Autowired dont need to do anything in your Test class. Your Autowired A should have correct instance of D. Also i think you need to use SpringJUnit4ClassRunner for Autowiring to work, with contextConfiguration set correctly. Because you are not using MockitoJunitRunner you need to initialize your mocks yourself using

MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(java.lang.Object testClass)

Yes, spy() is fit for your purpose. The warning is due to the fact that real methods are invoked, and hence you can get unexpected results (for example - real money being withdrawn from a bank account)

Just to complete the picture:

The latest version of Mockito 2 very well supports mocking of final classes. But you have to explicitly enable this new experimental feature first!

( see here on how to do that - it boils down to add a file mockito-extensions/org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker to your classpath, containing the value mock-maker-inline )

But of course: you only mock something if you have to. Your desire to mock Enum instances is most likely driven by either not understanding that - or because you created hard to test code here. In that sense the real answer would be to look into ways that avoid this kind of mocking in the first place.

You can write your custom matcher that will pass this condition.

 class NotNullObjects extends ArgumentMatcher<Review> {
     public boolean matches(Object object) {
         return object!=null;
     }
 }

Then usage

when(reviewBuilder.saveReviewModel(argThat(new NotNullObjects()))).thenReturn(2L);

My one advice is to think of some interface that you can expect there as na input of your method.

Try Cntrl + Shift + T on your eclipse screen. Check what are your results. Ideally eclipse should resolve this class only from one dependency. If you are getting multiple results, you may need to add exclusion on certain dependencies.

Also check if you are able to execute your test cases from command prompt. If you are able to do it, then it's not a maven problem. But if something is failing here, check your dependencies.

I had a test dependency on a third-party jar which used powermock. In order to resolve this error, I had to add:

@PowerMockIgnore("jdk.internal.reflect.*")

To the class that is tested with powermock

I've had good success using Mockito.

When I tried learning about JMock and EasyMock, I found the learning curve to be a bit steep (though maybe that's just me).

I like Mockito because of its simple and clean syntax that I was able to grasp pretty quickly. The minimal syntax is designed to support the common cases very well, although the few times I needed to do something more complicated I found what I wanted was supported and easy to grasp.

Here's an (abridged) example from the Mockito homepage:

import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;

List mockedList = mock(List.class);
mockedList.clear();
verify(mockedList).clear();

It doesn't get much simpler than that.

The only major downside I can think of is that it won't mock static methods.