How to use shouldHaveNoMoreInteractions method of org.mockito.BDDMockito class

You can try the following idea (taken from similar discussion on github):

.doAnswer { throw ServiceException("Bad Request") }

Your problem is the order of execution. The context is created containing your MockBean before you have a chance to set it up in your @Test. The solution is to provide a RestTemplateBuilder that's already fully setup when it's inserted into the context. You can do that like this.

Add the following to your @SpringBootTest annotation. Where TestApplication is your Spring Boot application class.

classes = {TestApplication.class, MyIT.ContextConfiguration.class},

Modify your class members thus, deleting your restTemplate and restTemplateBuilder.

@Autowired
private TestRestTemplate testRestTemplate;

Add a static inner class to your MyIT class:

@Configuration
static class ContextConfiguration {
  @Bean
  public RestTemplateBuilder restTemplateBuilder() {

    RestTemplateBuilder rtb = mock(RestTemplateBuilder.class);
    RestTemplate restTemplate = mock(RestTemplate.class);

    when(rtb.build()).thenReturn(restTemplate);
    return rtb;
  }
}

In your tests, modify the RestTemplate mock to do whatever you want:

@Test
public void someTest() {

  when(testRestTemplate.getRestTemplate().getForEntity(...
}

You either have to specify no matchers, or all the arguments need matches. So this:

when(userSubModuleDao.findById((any(UserSubModuleId.class)),false))

should be:

when(userSubModuleDao.findById(any(UserSubModuleId.class), eq(false)))

(I've removed the redundant brackets from around the any call.)

From the Matchers documentation:

Warning:

If you are using argument matchers, all arguments have to be provided by matchers.

According to the Mockito documentation you can set different behavior for consecutive method calls.

when(mock.someMethod("some arg"))
    .thenThrow(new RuntimeException())
    .thenReturn("foo");

In case of a void method you can do something similar (Mockito documentation)

doThrow(new RuntimeException())
    .doNothing()
    .when(mock).doSomething();

Mocks that return have the expectation that the return type matches the mocked object's return type.

Here's the mistake:

Mockito.when(remoteStore.get("a", "b")).thenReturn("lol");

"lol" isn't an Optional<String>, so it won't accept that as a valid return value.

The reason it worked when you did

Optional<Object> returnCacheValue = Optional.of((Object) returnCacheValueString);
Mockito.<Optional<Object>>when(remotestore.get("cache-name", "cache-key")).thenReturn(returnCacheValue);

is due to returnCacheValue being an Optional.

This is easy to fix: just change it to an Optional.of("lol") instead.

Mockito.when(remoteStore.get("a", "b")).thenReturn(Optional.of("lol"));

You can also do away with the type witnesses as well. The result above will be inferred to be Optional<String>.

For the mocks initialization, using the runner or the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks are strictly equivalent solutions. From the javadoc of the MockitoJUnitRunner :

JUnit 4.5 runner initializes mocks annotated with Mock, so that explicit usage of MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(Object) is not necessary. Mocks are initialized before each test method.

The first solution (with the MockitoAnnotations.initMocks) could be used when you have already configured a specific runner (SpringJUnit4ClassRunner for example) on your test case.

The second solution (with the MockitoJUnitRunner) is the more classic and my favorite. The code is simpler. Using a runner provides the great advantage of automatic validation of framework usage (described by @David Wallace in this answer).

Both solutions allows to share the mocks (and spies) between the test methods. Coupled with the @InjectMocks, they allow to write unit tests very quickly. The boilerplate mocking code is reduced, the tests are easier to read. For example:

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock(name = "database") private ArticleDatabase dbMock;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @InjectMocks private ArticleManager manager;

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        manager.initiateArticle();
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        manager.finishArticle();
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: The code is minimal

Cons: Black magic. IMO it is mainly due to the @InjectMocks annotation. With this annotation "you loose the pain of code" (see the great comments of @Brice)

The third solution is to create your mock on each test method. It allow as explained by @mlk in its answer to have "self contained test".

public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleCalculator calculator = mock(ArticleCalculator.class);
        ArticleDatabase database = mock(ArticleDatabase.class);
        UserProvider userProvider = spy(new ConsumerUserProvider());
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (BDD...)

Cons: there is more boilerplate code. (The mocks creation)

My recommandation is a compromise. Use the @Mock annotation with the @RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class), but do not use the @InjectMocks :

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ArticleManagerTest {

    @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
    @Mock private ArticleDatabase database;
    @Spy private UserProvider userProvider = new ConsumerUserProvider();

    @Test public void shouldDoSomething() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.initiateArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).addListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }

    @Test public void shouldDoSomethingElse() {
        // given
        ArticleManager manager = new ArticleManager(calculator, 
                                                    userProvider, 
                                                    database);

        // when 
        manager.finishArticle();

        // then 
        verify(database).removeListener(any(ArticleListener.class));
    }
}

Pros: You clearly demonstrate how your api works (How my ArticleManager is instantiated). No boilerplate code.

Cons: The test is not self contained, less pain of code

You cannot do this because according to spec you cannot put the same annotation twice on the same annotated element.

So, what is the solution? The solution is to put only one @RunWith() with runner you cannot stand without and replace other one with something else. In your case I guess you will remove MockitoJUnitRunner and do programatically what it does.

In fact the only thing it does it runs:

MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(test);

in the beginning of test case. So, the simplest solution is to put this code into setUp() method:

@Before
public void setUp() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}

I am not sure, but probably you should avoid multiple call of this method using flag:

private boolean mockInitialized = false;
@Before
public void setUp() {
    if (!mockInitialized) {
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
        mockInitialized = true;  
    }
}

However better, reusable solution may be implemented with JUnt's rules.

public class MockitoRule extends TestWatcher {
    private boolean mockInitialized = false;

    @Override
    protected void starting(Description d) {
        if (!mockInitialized) {
            MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
            mockInitialized = true;  
        }
    }
}

Now just add the following line to your test class:

@Rule public MockitoRule mockitoRule = MockitoJUnit.rule();

and you can run this test case with any runner you want.

In new Mockito versions you can use stubbing consecutive calls to throw exception on first can and returning a value on a second call.

when(mock.someMethod("some arg"))
    .thenThrow(new RuntimeException())
    .thenReturn("foo");

https://javadoc.io/doc/org.mockito/mockito-core/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html#10

In this case do I need to write a captor for each argument in spite of the fact I need to capture only the first argument?

durron597's answer is correct—you do not need to capture all arguments if you want to capture one of them. One point of clarification, though: a call to ArgumentCaptor.capture() counts as a Mockito matcher, and in Mockito if you use a matcher for any method argument you do have to use a matcher for all arguments.

For a method yourMock.yourMethod(int, int, int) and an ArgumentCaptor<Integer> intCaptor:

/*  good: */  verify(yourMock).yourMethod(2, 3, 4);  // eq by default
/*  same: */  verify(yourMock).yourMethod(eq(2), eq(3), eq(4));

/*   BAD: */  verify(yourMock).yourMethod(intCaptor.capture(), 3, 4);
/* fixed: */  verify(yourMock).yourMethod(intCaptor.capture(), eq(3), eq(4));

These also work:

verify(yourMock).yourMethod(intCaptor.capture(), eq(5), otherIntCaptor.capture());
verify(yourMock).yourMethod(intCaptor.capture(), anyInt(), gt(9000));