Best junit code snippet using org.hamcrest.core.SubstringMatcher.matchesSafely
Source: SubstringMatcher.java
...14/* 14 */ this.substring = substring;15/* */ }16/* */ 17/* */ 18/* */ public boolean matchesSafely(String item) {19/* 19 */ return evalSubstringOf(item);20/* */ }21/* */ 22/* */ public void describeMismatchSafely(String item, Description mismatchDescription) {23/* 23 */ mismatchDescription.appendText("was \"").appendText(item).appendText("\"");24/* */ }25/* */ 26/* */ 27/* */ public void describeTo(Description description) {28/* 28 */ description.appendText("a string ").appendText(relationship()).appendText(" ").appendValue(this.substring);29/* */ }30/* */ 31/* */ protected abstract boolean evalSubstringOf(String paramString);32/* */ ...
matchesSafely
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.hamcrest.core.SubstringMatcher2class TestSubstringMatcher extends SubstringMatcher {3 TestSubstringMatcher(String substring) {4 super(substring)5 }6 protected boolean evalSubstringOf(String s) {7 return s.contains(substring)8 }9 protected String relationship() {10 }11}12class TestSubstringMatcherSpec extends Specification {13 def "test substring matcher"() {14 actual == new TestSubstringMatcher(expected).matches(s)15 }16}17actual == new TestSubstringMatcher(expected).matches(s)18 at org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionEvaluator.evaluate(ConditionEvaluator.java:39)19 at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecInternals.evaluateCondition(SpecInternals.java:108)20 at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecInternals.evaluateCondition(SpecInternals.java:98)21 at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecInternals.evaluateCondition(SpecInternals.java:94)22 at TestSubstringMatcherSpec.test substring matcher(TestSubstringMatcherSpec.groovy:19)23Method Description capitalize() Converts the first character of the string to upper case. capitalizeFully() Converts the first character of each word in the string to upper case. codePointAt(int index) Returns the Unicode code point value of the character at the specified index. codePointBefore(int index) Returns the Unicode code point value of the character before the specified index. codePointCount(int beginIndex, int endIndex) Returns the number of Unicode code points in the specified text range of the string. compareTo(String anotherString) Compares two strings lexicographically. compareToIgnoreCase(String str) Compares two strings
matchesSafely
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.hamcrest.Description;2import org.hamcrest.Factory;3import org.hamcrest.Matcher;4import org.hamcrest.core.SubstringMatcher;5public class SubstringMatcherTest extends SubstringMatcher {6 public SubstringMatcherTest(String substring) {7 super(substring);8 }9 protected boolean evalSubstringOf(String s) {10 return s.contains(substring);11 }12 protected boolean evalSubstringOf(StringBuffer s) {13 return s.toString().contains(substring);14 }15 protected String relationship() {16 return "containing";17 }18 public static Matcher<String> containsString(String substring) {19 return new SubstringMatcherTest(substring);20 }21 public static Matcher<StringBuffer> containsString(StringBuffer substring) {22 return new SubstringMatcherTest(substring.toString());23 }24}
matchesSafely
Using AI Code Generation
1package com.example.demo;2import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.containsString;3import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.not;4import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;5import org.junit.Test;6public class HamcrestSubstringMatcherTest {7 public void whenMatchesSafely_thenCorrect() {8 String str = "This is a string";9 assertThat(str, containsString("is"));10 assertThat(str, not(containsString("is not")));11 }12}
matchesSafely
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.hamcrest.core.SubstringMatcher;2import org.junit.Test;3import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;4import static org.hamcrest.core.Is.is;5public class StringContainsSubstring {6 public void testStringContainsSubstring() {7 String string = "abc";8 String substring = "b";9 assertThat(string, is(SubstringMatcher.containsString(substring)));10 }11}
matchesSafely
Using AI Code Generation
1public final static boolean contains(String actual, String given) {2 return new SubstringMatcher() {3 protected boolean evalSubstringOf(String s) {4 return s.contains(given);5 }6 protected String relationship() {7 return "containing";8 }9 }.matchesSafely(actual);10}
AssertContains on strings in jUnit
junit assertEquals ignore case
Difference between junit-vintage-engine and junit-jupiter-engine?
Mock a constructor with parameter
Can Selenium take a screenshot on test failure with JUnit?
How to run JUnit tests by category in Maven?
Testing for multiple exceptions with JUnit 4 annotations
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/textui/ResultPrinter
How do I ignore certain elements when comparing XML?
Java JUnit: The method X is ambiguous for type Y
If you add in Hamcrest and JUnit4, you could do:
String x = "foo bar";
Assert.assertThat(x, CoreMatchers.containsString("foo"));
With some static imports, it looks a lot better:
assertThat(x, containsString("foo"));
The static imports needed would be:
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.containsString;
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In today’s digital age, product teams must build products at a brisk pace while maintaining the best quality. Therefore, the methodology to follow and the tool selection to accomplish this can be paramount to get better results. Moreover, software applications don’t just support businesses now; rather, they have become an integral part of a business. Hence, it’s obvious that the product teams deliver a product with speed, reliability, scale, security, quality, and improved collaboration. So companies started following the DevOps model, which is a combination of Development (Dev) and Operations (Ops) teams.
So you are at the beginning of 2020 and probably have committed a new year resolution as a tester to take a leap from Manual Testing To Automation . However, to automate your test scripts you need to get your hands dirty on a programming language and that is where you are stuck! Or you are already proficient in automation testing through a single programming language and are thinking about venturing into new programming languages for automation testing, along with their respective frameworks. You are bound to be confused about picking your next milestone. After all, there are numerous programming languages to choose from.
Both JUnit and TestNG are popular unit testing frameworks that have been widely accepted by Java developers. JUnit was introduced as an open-source unit testing framework for Java way back in 1997. In fact, JUnit is one of the widely used test automation frameworks for test automation. TestNG is another Java-based test automation framework that is not only open-source but also offers awesome features that are best suited for large-scale web automation testing. TestNG was created for a range of testing categories, including (but not limited to) unit testing, functional testing, end-to-end testing, and integration testing.
CI/CD pipelines are here to stay and contribute tremendously to continuous integration and delivery across all global projects. This article will be a guide to configure, set up builds and tests with “GitHub Actions”, primarily using Selenium WebDriver. This article shall also cover some of the most generic GitHub Actions examples, and user flows.
This article is a part of our Content Hub. For more in-depth resources, check out our content hub on JUnit Tutorial.
LambdaTest also has a detailed JUnit tutorial explaining its features, importance, advanced use cases, best practices, and more to help you get started with running your automation testing scripts.
Here are the detailed JUnit testing chapters to help you get started:
You can also check out our JUnit certification if you wish to take your career in Selenium automation testing with JUnit to the next level.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!