Best FluentLenium code snippet using org.fluentlenium.assertj.integration.element.FluentWebElementClickableTest.testIsClickablePositive
...4import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy;5import static org.fluentlenium.assertj.FluentLeniumAssertions.assertThat;6public class FluentWebElementClickableTest extends IntegrationTest {7 @Test8 public void testIsClickablePositive() {9 goTo(DEFAULT_URL);10 assertThat(el("select")).isClickable();11 }12 @Test13 public void testIsClickableNegative() {14 goTo(DEFAULT_URL);15 assertThatThrownBy(() -> assertThat(el("#disabled")).isClickable())16 .isInstanceOf(AssertionError.class)17 .hasMessage("Element in assertion is present but not clickable");18 }19 @Test20 public void testIsClickableNotPresent() {21 goTo(DEFAULT_URL);22 assertThatThrownBy(() -> assertThat(el("#nonexisting")).isClickable())...
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
I routinely come across test strategy documents when working with customers. They are lengthy—100 pages or more—and packed with monotonous text that is routinely reused from one project to another. Yawn once more— the test halt and resume circumstances, the defect management procedure, entrance and exit criteria, unnecessary generic risks, and in fact, one often-used model replicates the requirements of textbook testing, from stress to systems integration.
Most test automation tools just do test execution automation. Without test design involved in the whole test automation process, the test cases remain ad hoc and detect only simple bugs. This solution is just automation without real testing. In addition, test execution automation is very inefficient.
Collecting and examining data from multiple sources can be a tedious process. The digital world is constantly evolving. To stay competitive in this fast-paced environment, businesses must frequently test their products and services. While it’s easy to collect raw data from multiple sources, it’s far more complex to interpret it properly.
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
The holidays are just around the corner, and with Christmas and New Year celebrations coming up, everyone is busy preparing for the festivities! And during this busy time of year, LambdaTest also prepped something special for our beloved developers and testers – #LambdaTestYourBusiness
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!