Best Assertj code snippet using org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator.compareArrays
...195 continue;196 }197 // TODO move hasFieldTypesDifference check into each compareXXX198 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldAnArray()) {199 compareArrays(dualValue, comparisonState);200 continue;201 }202 // we compare ordered collections specifically as to be matching, each pair of elements at a given index must match.203 // concretely we compare: (col1[0] vs col2[0]), (col1[1] vs col2[1])...(col1[n] vs col2[n])204 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldAnOrderedCollection()205 && !recursiveComparisonConfiguration.shouldIgnoreCollectionOrder(dualValue)) {206 compareOrderedCollections(dualValue, comparisonState);207 continue;208 }209 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldAnIterable()) {210 compareUnorderedIterables(dualValue, comparisonState);211 continue;212 }213 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldAnOptional()) {214 compareOptional(dualValue, comparisonState);215 continue;216 }217 // Compare two SortedMaps taking advantage of the fact that these Maps can be compared in O(N) time due to their ordering218 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldASortedMap()) {219 compareSortedMap(dualValue, comparisonState);220 continue;221 }222 // Compare two Unordered Maps. This is a slightly more expensive comparison because order cannot be assumed, therefore a223 // temporary Map must be created, however the comparison still runs in O(N) time.224 if (dualValue.isExpectedFieldAMap()) {225 compareUnorderedMap(dualValue, comparisonState);226 continue;227 }228 if (shouldCompareDualValue(recursiveComparisonConfiguration, dualValue)) {229 if (!actualFieldValue.equals(expectedFieldValue)) comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue);230 continue;231 }232 Class<?> actualFieldValueClass = actualFieldValue.getClass();233 Class<?> expectedFieldClass = expectedFieldValue.getClass();234 if (recursiveComparisonConfiguration.isInStrictTypeCheckingMode() && expectedTypeIsNotSubtypeOfActualType(dualValue)) {235 comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue, STRICT_TYPE_ERROR, expectedFieldClass.getName(),236 actualFieldValueClass.getName());237 continue;238 }239 Set<String> actualNonIgnoredFieldsNames = recursiveComparisonConfiguration.getNonIgnoredActualFieldNames(dualValue);240 Set<String> expectedFieldsNames = getFieldsNames(expectedFieldClass);241 // Check if expected has more fields than actual, in that case the additional fields are reported as difference242 if (!expectedFieldsNames.containsAll(actualNonIgnoredFieldsNames)) {243 // report missing fields in actual244 Set<String> actualFieldsNamesNotInExpected = newHashSet(actualNonIgnoredFieldsNames);245 actualFieldsNamesNotInExpected.removeAll(expectedFieldsNames);246 String missingFields = actualFieldsNamesNotInExpected.toString();247 String expectedClassName = expectedFieldClass.getName();248 String actualClassName = actualFieldValueClass.getName();249 String missingFieldsDescription = format(MISSING_FIELDS, actualClassName, expectedClassName,250 expectedFieldClass.getSimpleName(), actualFieldValueClass.getSimpleName(),251 missingFields);252 comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue, missingFieldsDescription);253 } else { // TODO remove else to report more diff254 // compare actual's fields against expected :255 // - if actual has more fields than expected, the additional fields are ignored as expected is the reference256 for (String actualFieldName : actualNonIgnoredFieldsNames) {257 if (expectedFieldsNames.contains(actualFieldName)) {258 DualValue newDualValue = new DualValue(currentPath, actualFieldName,259 COMPARISON.getSimpleValue(actualFieldName, actualFieldValue),260 COMPARISON.getSimpleValue(actualFieldName, expectedFieldValue));261 comparisonState.registerForComparison(newDualValue);262 }263 }264 }265 }266 return comparisonState.getDifferences();267 }268 private static boolean shouldCompareDualValue(RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonConfiguration,269 final DualValue dualValue) {270 return !recursiveComparisonConfiguration.shouldIgnoreOverriddenEqualsOf(dualValue)271 && hasOverriddenEquals(dualValue.actual.getClass());272 }273 // avoid comparing enum recursively since they contain static fields which are ignored in recursive comparison274 // this would make different field enum value to be considered the same!275 private static void compareAsEnums(final DualValue dualValue,276 ComparisonState comparisonState,277 RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonConfiguration) {278 if (recursiveComparisonConfiguration.isInStrictTypeCheckingMode()) {279 // we can use == for comparison which checks both actual and expected values and types are the same280 if (dualValue.actual != dualValue.expected) comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue);281 return;282 }283 if (!dualValue.isActualAnEnum()) {284 comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue, differentTypeErrorMessage(dualValue, "an enum"));285 return;286 }287 // both actual and expected are enums288 Enum<?> actualEnum = (Enum<?>) dualValue.actual;289 Enum<?> expectedEnum = (Enum<?>) dualValue.expected;290 // we must only compare actual and expected enum by value but not by type291 if (!actualEnum.name().equals(expectedEnum.name())) comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue);292 }293 private static boolean shouldHonorOverriddenEquals(DualValue dualValue,294 RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonConfiguration) {295 boolean shouldNotIgnoreOverriddenEqualsIfAny = !recursiveComparisonConfiguration.shouldIgnoreOverriddenEqualsOf(dualValue);296 return shouldNotIgnoreOverriddenEqualsIfAny && dualValue.actual != null && hasOverriddenEquals(dualValue.actual.getClass());297 }298 private static void compareArrays(DualValue dualValue, ComparisonState comparisonState) {299 if (!dualValue.isActualFieldAnArray()) {300 // at the moment we only allow comparing arrays with arrays but we might allow comparing to collections later on301 // but only if we are not in strict type mode.302 comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue, differentTypeErrorMessage(dualValue, "an array"));303 return;304 }305 // both values in dualValue are arrays306 int actualArrayLength = Array.getLength(dualValue.actual);307 int expectedArrayLength = Array.getLength(dualValue.expected);308 if (actualArrayLength != expectedArrayLength) {309 comparisonState.addDifference(dualValue, DIFFERENT_SIZE_ERROR, "arrays", actualArrayLength, expectedArrayLength);310 // no need to inspect elements, arrays are not equal as they don't have the same size311 return;312 }...
compareArrays
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator;2import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator.RecursiveComparisonDifference;3public class Test {4 public static void main(String[] args) {5 String[] actual = {"a", "b", "c"};6 String[] expected = {"a", "b", "c"};7 RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator calculator = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator();8 RecursiveComparisonDifference difference = calculator.calculateDifferences(actual, expected);9 System.out.println(difference);10 }11}
compareArrays
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator2import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration3import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifference4def diff1 = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator().compareArrays(list1, list2, new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration())5def diff2 = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator().compareArrays(list1, list3, new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration())6def diff3 = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator().compareArrays(list1, list4, new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration())7def diff4 = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator().compareArrays(list1, list5, new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration())8def diff = diff1.merge(diff2).merge(diff3).merge(diff4)9def diff = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator().compareArrays(list1, list2, new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration())
compareArrays
Using AI Code Generation
1RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator calc = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator();2List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();3list1.add("a");4list1.add("b");5List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();6list2.add("b");7list2.add("a");8calc.compareArrays(list1,list2);9RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator calc = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator();10List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();11list1.add("a");12list1.add("b");13List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();14list2.add("b");15list2.add("a");16calc.compare(list1,list2);17RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator calc = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator();18List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();19list1.add("a");20list1.add("b");21List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();22list2.add("b");23list2.add("a");24calc.assertThat(list1,list2);
compareArrays
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator;2import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifference;3import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration;4import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfigurationBuilder;5import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.Delta;6import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.DeltaBuilder;7class Person {8 String name;9 int age;10 public Person(String name, int age) {11 this.name = name;12 this.age = age;13 }14 public String getName() {15 return name;16 }17 public int getAge() {18 return age;19 }20}21class PersonComparator {22 public static void main(String[] args) {23 Person[] persons1 = new Person[] {24 new Person("John", 20),25 new Person("Peter", 22)26 };27 Person[] persons2 = new Person[] {28 new Person("John", 20),29 new Person("Peter", 22)30 };31 .recursiveComparison()32 .withIgnoredFields("age")33 .build();34 RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator recursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator = new RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator(recursiveComparisonConfiguration);35 RecursiveComparisonDifference[] recursiveComparisonDifferences = recursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator.compareArrays(persons1, persons2);36 for (RecursiveComparisonDifference recursiveComparisonDifference : recursiveComparisonDifferences) {37 System.out.println(recursiveComparisonDifference);38 }39 }40}41In this example, we have created two arrays of Person objects. We have set the age field of the first Person object to 20 and the age field of the second Person object to 22. We have created a RecursiveComparisonConfiguration object with the withIgnoredFields() method and passed the age field name to it. We have created a RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator object with the RecursiveComparisonConfiguration object as an argument. We have called the compareArrays
compareArrays
Using AI Code Generation
1import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;2import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy;3import static org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator.compareArrays;4import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.Difference;5import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.DifferenceEvaluator;6import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.FieldLocation;7import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.FieldLocation.FieldLocationBuilder;8import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifference;9import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceCalculator;10import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator;11import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.DelegateComparisonDifferenceEvaluator;12import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory;13import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilder;14import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilder.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocation;15import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilder.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocation.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocationAndEvaluator;16import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilder.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocation.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocationAndEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocationEvaluatorAndFactory;17import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactory.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilder.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocation.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluatorFactoryBuilderWithFieldLocationAndEvaluator.RecursiveComparisonDifferenceEvaluato
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In 2007, Steve Jobs launched the first iPhone, which revolutionized the world. But because of that, many businesses dealt with the problem of changing the layout of websites from desktop to mobile by delivering completely different mobile-compatible websites under the subdomain of ‘m’ (e.g., https://m.facebook.com). And we were all trying to figure out how to work in this new world of contending with mobile and desktop screen sizes.
Anyone who has worked in the software industry for a while can tell you stories about projects that were on the verge of failure. Many initiatives fail even before they reach clients, which is especially disheartening when the failure is fully avoidable.
Lack of training is something that creates a major roadblock for a tester. Often, testers working in an organization are all of a sudden forced to learn a new framework or an automation tool whenever a new project demands it. You may be overwhelmed on how to learn test automation, where to start from and how to master test automation for web applications, and mobile applications on a new technology so soon.
Websites and web apps are growing in number day by day, and so are the expectations of people for a pleasant web experience. Even though the World Wide Web (WWW) was invented only in 1989 (32 years back), this technology has revolutionized the world we know back then. The best part is that it has made life easier for us. You no longer have to stand in long queues to pay your bills. You can get that done within a few minutes by visiting their website, web app, or mobile app.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!