Best Assertj code snippet using org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonAssert_isEqualTo_with_optional_Test.BookWithOptionalCoAuthor
...24import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.MethodSource;25class RecursiveComparisonAssert_isEqualTo_with_optional_Test extends RecursiveComparisonAssert_isEqualTo_BaseTest {26 @ParameterizedTest27 @MethodSource("sameBooks")28 void should_pass_when_comparing_optional_fields_recursively_and_not_using_optional_equals(BookWithOptionalCoAuthor actual,29 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor expected) {30 assertThat(actual).usingRecursiveComparison()31 .isEqualTo(expected);32 }33 static Stream<Arguments> sameBooks() {34 return Stream.of(Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("test"), new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("test")),35 // empty optional coAuthor36 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(null), new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(null)),37 // null coAuthor38 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(), new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor()));39 }40 @ParameterizedTest(name = "author 1 {0} / author 2 {1} / path {2} / value 1 {3}/ value 2 {4}")41 @MethodSource("differentBookWithOptionalCoAuthors")42 void should_fail_when_comparing_different_optional_fields(BookWithOptionalCoAuthor actual,43 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor expected, String path, Object value1,44 Object value2) {45 // WHEN46 compareRecursivelyFailsAsExpected(actual, expected);47 // THEN48 verifyShouldBeEqualByComparingFieldByFieldRecursivelyCall(actual, expected, diff(path, value1, value2));49 }50 private static Stream<Arguments> differentBookWithOptionalCoAuthors() {51 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor pratchett = new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett");52 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor georgeMartin = new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("George Martin");53 return Stream.of(Arguments.of(pratchett, georgeMartin,54 "coAuthor.value.name", "Terry Pratchett", "George Martin"),55 Arguments.of(pratchett, new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(null),56 "coAuthor", Optional.of(new Author("Terry Pratchett")), Optional.empty()),57 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(null), pratchett,58 "coAuthor", Optional.empty(), Optional.of(new Author("Terry Pratchett"))),59 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 1, 2L, 3.0),60 new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 2, 2L, 3.0),61 "numberOfPages", OptionalInt.of(1), OptionalInt.of(2)),62 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 1, 2L, 3.0),63 new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 1, 4L, 3.0),64 "bookId", OptionalLong.of(2L), OptionalLong.of(4L)),65 Arguments.of(new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 1, 2L, 3.0),66 new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor("Terry Pratchett", 1, 2L, 6.0),67 "price", OptionalDouble.of(3.0), OptionalDouble.of(6.0)));68 }69 @Test70 void should_fail_when_comparing_non_optional_expected_field_with_optional_actual_field() {71 // GIVEN72 Author pratchett = new Author("Terry Pratchett");73 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor actual = new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(pratchett.name);74 BookWithCoAuthor expected = new BookWithCoAuthor(pratchett);75 // WHEN76 compareRecursivelyFailsAsExpected(actual, expected);77 // THEN78 verifyShouldBeEqualByComparingFieldByFieldRecursivelyCall(actual, expected,79 diff("bookId", null, 0l),80 diff("coAuthor", Optional.of(pratchett), pratchett),81 diff("numberOfPages", null, 0),82 diff("price", null, 0.0));83 }84 @Test85 void should_fail_when_comparing_optional_expected_field_with_non_optional_actual_field() {86 // GIVEN87 Author pratchett = new Author("Terry Pratchett");88 BookWithCoAuthor actual = new BookWithCoAuthor(pratchett);89 BookWithOptionalCoAuthor expected = new BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(pratchett.name);90 // WHEN91 compareRecursivelyFailsAsExpected(actual, expected);92 // THEN93 verifyShouldBeEqualByComparingFieldByFieldRecursivelyCall(actual, expected,94 diff("bookId", 0l, null),95 diff("coAuthor", pratchett, Optional.of(pratchett),96 "expected field is an Optional but actual field is not (org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.Author)"),97 diff("numberOfPages", 0, null),98 diff("price", 0.0, null));99 }100 static class BookWithOptionalCoAuthor {101 Optional<Author> coAuthor;102 OptionalInt numberOfPages;103 OptionalLong bookId;104 OptionalDouble price;105 public BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(String coAuthor) {106 this.coAuthor = Optional.ofNullable(coAuthor == null ? null : new Author(coAuthor));107 }108 public BookWithOptionalCoAuthor() {109 this.coAuthor = null;110 }111 public BookWithOptionalCoAuthor(String coAuthor, int numberOfPages, long bookId, double price) {112 this.coAuthor = Optional.ofNullable(coAuthor == null ? null : new Author(coAuthor));113 this.numberOfPages = OptionalInt.of(numberOfPages);114 this.bookId = OptionalLong.of(bookId);115 this.price = OptionalDouble.of(price);116 }117 public Optional<Author> getCoAuthor() {118 return coAuthor;119 }120 }121 static class BookWithCoAuthor {122 Author coAuthor;123 int numberOfPages;124 long bookId;125 double price;...
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
In an ideal world, you can test your web application in the same test environment and return the same results every time. The reality can be difficult sometimes when you have flaky tests, which may be due to the complexity of the web elements you are trying to perform an action on your test case.
The QA testing profession requires both educational and long-term or experience-based learning. One can learn the basics from certification courses and exams, boot camp courses, and college-level courses where available. However, developing instinctive and practical skills works best when built with work experience.
Pair testing can help you complete your testing tasks faster and with higher quality. But who can do pair testing, and when should it be done? And what form of pair testing is best for your circumstance? Check out this blog for more information on how to conduct pair testing to optimize its benefits.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!