Best Assertj code snippet using org.assertj.core.api.date.DateAssert_isEqualToIgnoringMillis_Test.assertionInvocationWithStringArg
Source:DateAssert_isEqualToIgnoringMillis_Test.java
...25 protected DateAssert assertionInvocationWithDateArg() {26 return assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(otherDate);27 }28 @Override29 protected DateAssert assertionInvocationWithStringArg(String date) {30 return assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(date);31 }32 @Override33 protected void verifyAssertionInvocation(Date date) {34 verify(dates).assertIsEqualWithPrecision(getInfo(assertions), getActual(assertions), date, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);35 }36}...
assertionInvocationWithStringArg
Using AI Code Generation
1assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(2010-01-01);2assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringSeconds(2010-01-01);3assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringHours(2010-01-01);4assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringMinutes(2010-01-01);5assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringDays(2010-01-01);6assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringMonths(2010-01-01);7assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringYears(2010-01-01);8assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringHours(2010-01-01);9assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringMinutes(2010-01-01);10assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringDays(2010-01-01);11assertThat(2010-01-01).isEqualToIgnoringMonths(2010-01-01);12assertThat(
assertionInvocationWithStringArg
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;2import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ExtendWith;3import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;4import java.time.LocalDate;5import java.time.LocalDateTime;6import java.time.LocalTime;7import java.time.Month;8import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.*;9import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;10@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)11public class DateAssert_isEqualToIgnoringMillis_Test {12 public void should_pass_if_actual_is_equal_to_other_ignoring_millis_fields() {13 assertThat(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 0)).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 500));14 assertThat(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 500)).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 0));15 }16 public void should_fail_if_actual_is_not_equal_to_given_localdatetime_with_millis_ignored() {17 AssertionError assertionError = expectAssertionError(() -> assertThat(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 0)).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 500)));18 assertThat(assertionError).hasMessage(format("%nExpecting:%n <2000-01-01T23:59:59>%nto have same year, month, day, hour and minute as:%n <2000-01-01T23:59:59.000000500>%nbut had not."));19 }20 public void should_fail_if_actual_is_not_equal_to_given_localdate_with_millis_ignored() {21 AssertionError assertionError = expectAssertionError(() -> assertThat(LocalDateTime.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1, 23, 59, 59, 0)).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(LocalDate.of(2000, Month.JANUARY, 1)));22 assertThat(assertionError).hasMessage(format("%n
assertionInvocationWithStringArg
Using AI Code Generation
1public class DateAssert_isEqualToIgnoringMillis_Test extends DateAssertBaseTest {2 public void should_pass_if_actual_is_equal_to_other_ignoring_millis() {3 assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(parseDatetimeWithMs("2011-01-01T03:03:03.123"));4 }5 public void should_fail_if_actual_is_not_equal_to_given_date_with_millis_ignored() {6 AssertionInfo info = someInfo();7 Date other = parseDatetimeWithMs("2011-01-01T03:03:03.000");8 Throwable error = catchThrowable(() -> assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(other));9 assertThat(error).isInstanceOf(AssertionError.class);10 verify(failures).failure(info, shouldBeEqualIgnoringMillis(actual, other));11 }12 public void should_fail_as_dates_fields_are_different_even_if_time_difference_is_less_than_1_millisecond() {13 AssertionInfo info = someInfo();14 Date other = parseDatetimeWithMs("2011-01-01T03:03:04.000");15 Throwable error = catchThrowable(() -> assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(other));16 assertThat(error).isInstanceOf(AssertionError.class);17 verify(failures).failure(info, shouldBeEqualIgnoringMillis(actual, other));18 }19 public void should_fail_if_actual_is_null() {20 actual = null;21 AssertionError error = expectAssertionError(() -> assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(parseDatetimeWithMs("2011-01-01T03:03:03.000")));22 then(error).hasMessage(actualIsNull());23 }24 public void should_fail_if_date_parameter_is_null() {25 Date other = null;26 Throwable error = catchThrowable(() -> assertions.isEqualToIgnoringMillis(other));27 then(error).isInstanceOf(NullPointerException.class);28 }29 public void should_fail_if_date_as_string_parameter_is_null() {
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
The best agile teams are built from people who work together as one unit, where each team member has both the technical and the personal skills to allow the team to become self-organized, cross-functional, and self-motivated. These are all big words that I hear in almost every agile project. Still, the criteria to make a fantastic agile team are practically impossible to achieve without one major factor: motivation towards a common goal.
Unit and functional testing are the prime ways of verifying the JavaScript code quality. However, a host of tools are available that can also check code before or during its execution in order to test its quality and adherence to coding standards. With each tool having its unique features and advantages contributing to its testing capabilities, you can use the tool that best suits your need for performing JavaScript testing.
The purpose of developing test cases is to ensure the application functions as expected for the customer. Test cases provide basic application documentation for every function, feature, and integrated connection. Test case development often detects defects in the design or missing requirements early in the development process. Additionally, well-written test cases provide internal documentation for all application processing. Test case development is an important part of determining software quality and keeping defects away from customers.
The QA testing career includes following an often long, winding road filled with fun, chaos, challenges, and complexity. Financially, the spectrum is broad and influenced by location, company type, company size, and the QA tester’s experience level. QA testing is a profitable, enjoyable, and thriving career choice.
Estimates are critical if you want to be successful with projects. If you begin with a bad estimating approach, the project will almost certainly fail. To produce a much more promising estimate, direct each estimation-process issue toward a repeatable standard process. A smart approach reduces the degree of uncertainty. When dealing with presales phases, having the most precise estimation findings can assist you to deal with the project plan. This also helps the process to function more successfully, especially when faced with tight schedules and the danger of deviation.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!