How to use with_transactional_autowired_should_also_work method of com.tngtech.jgiven.integration.spring.junit5.test.proxy.SpringTransactionalTest class

These days, development teams depend heavily on feedback from automated tests to evaluate the quality of the system they are working on.

Unit and functional testing are the prime ways of verifying the JavaScript code quality. However, a host of tools are available that can also check code before or during its execution in order to test its quality and adherence to coding standards. With each tool having its unique features and advantages contributing to its testing capabilities, you can use the tool that best suits your need for performing JavaScript testing.

One of the essential parts when performing automated UI testing, whether using Selenium or another framework, is identifying the correct web elements the tests will interact with. However, if the web elements are not located correctly, you might get NoSuchElementException in Selenium. This would cause a false negative result because we won’t get to the actual functionality check. Instead, our test will fail simply because it failed to interact with the correct element.

It’s strange to hear someone declare, “This can’t be tested.” In reply, I contend that everything can be tested. However, one must be pleased with the outcome of testing, which might include failure, financial loss, or personal injury. Could anything be tested when a claim is made with this understanding?