Best SeLion code snippet using com.paypal.selion.platform.dataprovider.ExcelDataProviderTest.testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes
Source: ExcelDataProviderTest.java
...240 List<String> fetchedNames = transformExcelDataIntoList(allUsers);241 assertTrue(arrayComparer(new String[] { "Thomas", "rama" }, fetchedNames.toArray()), assertFailedMsg);242 }243 @Test(groups = "unit")244 public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes()245 throws IOException {246 SimpleIndexInclusionFilter filter = new SimpleIndexInclusionFilter("1-2,4,5");247 Iterator<Object[]> allUsers = dataSource.getDataByFilter(filter);248 List<String> fetchedNames = transformExcelDataIntoList(allUsers);249 assertTrue(arrayComparer(new String[] { "Thomas", "rama", "suri", "suri" }, fetchedNames.toArray()),250 assertFailedMsg);251 }252 @Test(groups = "unit", expectedExceptions = { IllegalArgumentException.class }, expectedExceptionsMessageRegExp = "Please provide valid indexes for filtering")253 public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithNullIndexes() {254 // Passing just null will give compilation error.255 new SimpleIndexInclusionFilter((String) null);256 }257 @Test(groups = "unit")258 public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWhereNoValuesReturns() throws IOException {...
testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes
Using AI Code Generation
1@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes", dataProviderClass = ExcelDataProviderTest.class)2public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(String[] row) {3}4@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes", dataProviderClass = ExcelDataProviderTest.class)5public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(String[] row) {6}7@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes", dataProviderClass = ExcelDataProviderTest.class)8public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(String[] row) {9}10@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes", dataProviderClass = ExcelDataProviderTest.class)11public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(String[] row) {12}13@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes", dataProviderClass = ExcelDataProviderTest.class)14public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(String[] row) {15}16@Test(dataProvider = "testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAnd
testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes
Using AI Code Generation
1@DataProvider(name = "excel-data-provider", values = "src/test/resources/DataProviderTest.xlsx")2public class ExcelDataProviderTest {3 @Test(dataProvider = "excel-data-provider")4 public void testGetExcelRowsWithSimpleInclusionDataProviderFilterWithIndividualAndRangeOfIndexes(Object[] data) {5 System.out.println(Arrays.toString(data));6 }7}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
I think that probably most development teams describe themselves as being “agile” and probably most development teams have standups, and meetings called retrospectives.There is also a lot of discussion about “agile”, much written about “agile”, and there are many presentations about “agile”. A question that is often asked is what comes after “agile”? Many testers work in “agile” teams so this question matters to us.
Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.
In general, software testers have a challenging job. Software testing is frequently the final significant activity undertaken prior to actually delivering a product. Since the terms “software” and “late” are nearly synonymous, it is the testers that frequently catch the ire of the whole business as they try to test the software at the end. It is the testers who are under pressure to finish faster and deem the product “release candidate” before they have had enough opportunity to be comfortable. To make matters worse, if bugs are discovered in the product after it has been released, everyone looks to the testers and says, “Why didn’t you spot those bugs?” The testers did not cause the bugs, but they must bear some of the guilt for the bugs that were disclosed.
Before we discuss Scala testing, let us understand the fundamentals of Scala and how this programming language is a preferred choice for your development requirements.The popularity and usage of Scala are rapidly rising, evident by the ever-increasing open positions for Scala developers.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!