Mockito

You could capture the value, e.g.

final ArgumentCaptor<Double> captor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Double.class)
...
verify(myManager).method1(captor.capture());

Then assert:

assertEquals(expected, captor.getValue(), delta)

Or, perhaps, use an argument matcher which does the assertion:

verify(myManager).method1(doubleThat(new ArgumentMatcher<Double>() 
{
    @Override 
    public boolean matches(final Object actual)
    {
        return Math.abs(expected - (Double) actual) <= delta;
    }
}));

Update:

Instead of using either of the methods above, you could use AdditionalMatchers.eq(double, double) instead, e.g.:

verify(myManager).method1(AdditionalMatchers.eq(expected, delta));

Although use AdditonalMatchers matchers wisely, as per the documentation:

AdditionalMatchers provides rarely used matchers, kept only for somewhat compatibility with EasyMock. Use additional matchers very judiciously because they may impact readability of a test. It is recommended to use matchers from Matchers and keep stubbing and verification simple.

There's no need to mock such deep calls. Simply mock personRepo.findAll() and let the Streaming API work as normal:

Person person1 = ...
Person person2 = ...
Person person3 = ...
List<Person> people = Arrays.asList(person1, person2, ...);
when(personRepo.findAll()).thenReturn(people);

And then instead of

.filter( p -> (p.getEmail().equals(Mockito.any(String.class))) )

just set/mock email on your Person objects to be the expected value.

Alternatively, consider implementing PersonRepo.findByEmail.

You can use Mockito's Answer to mock the stream.

    String expectedContents = "Some contents";
    InputStream testInputStream = new StringInputStream(expectedContents);
    S3ObjectInputStream s3ObjectInputStream = mock(S3ObjectInputStream.class);
    S3Object s3Object = mock(S3Object.class);
    AmazonS3Client amazonS3Client = mock(AmazonS3Client.class);
    S3AttachmentsService service = new S3AttachmentsService(amazonS3Client);

    when(s3ObjectInputStream.read(any(byte[].class))).thenAnswer(invocation -> {
        return testInputStream.read(invocation.getArgument(0));
    });

I have a more extensive example here. Hope that helps.

Another way of dealing with this issue is the following:

/**
 * This method overcomes the issue with the original Mockito.spy when passing a lambda which fails with an error
 * saying that the passed class is final.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static <T, P extends T> P spyLambda(Class<T> lambdaType, P lambda) {
    return (P) mock(lambdaType, delegatesTo(lambda));
}

Which allows spying the lambda by changing the first method as following:

@Test
void spyingLambda() {
    Supplier<String> spy = spyLambda(Supplier.class, () -> "1");
    spy.get();
}

Hopefully the above examples might help others who encounter the same issue.

You are using mockito anyString() while calling the test method, it should be used only for verifying a mock object to ensure a certain method is called with any string parameter inside the test, but not to invoke the test itself. For your test use empty string "" instead to anyString().

As a temporary workaround, you can do the following:

trait MockitoHelper extends MockitoSugar {
  def doReturn(toBeReturned: Any): Stubber = {
    Mockito.doReturn(toBeReturned, Nil: _*)
  }
}

Then have your test mixin this MockitoHelper.

Just to complete the picture:

The latest version of Mockito 2 very well supports mocking of final classes. But you have to explicitly enable this new experimental feature first!

( see here on how to do that - it boils down to add a file mockito-extensions/org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker to your classpath, containing the value mock-maker-inline )

But of course: you only mock something if you have to. Your desire to mock Enum instances is most likely driven by either not understanding that - or because you created hard to test code here. In that sense the real answer would be to look into ways that avoid this kind of mocking in the first place.

The two syntaxes for stubbing are roughly equivalent. However, you can always use doReturn/when for stubbing; but there are cases where you can't use when/thenReturn. Stubbing void methods is one such. Others include use with Mockito spies, and stubbing the same method more than once.

One thing that when/thenReturn gives you, that doReturn/when doesn't, is type-checking of the value that you're returning, at compile time. However, I believe this is of almost no value - if you've got the type wrong, you'll find out as soon as you run your test.

I strongly recommend only using doReturn/when. There is no point in learning two syntaxes when one will do.

You may wish to refer to my answer at Forming Mockito "grammars" - a more detailed answer to a very closely related question.

Mockito supports this out of the box:

public class ProductionCodeClassTest {

    @Mock
    private DependencyClass dependency;

    @InjectMocks
    private ProductionCodeClass testedInstance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        testedInstance = new ProductionCodeClass();
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
    }

}

The @InjectMocks annotation will trigger injection of classes or interfaces mocked in the test class, in this case DependencyClass:

Mockito tries to inject by type (using name in case types are the same). Mockito does not throw anything when injection fails - you will have to satisfy the dependencies manually.

Here, I am also using the @Mock annotation instead of calling mock(). You could still use mock(), but I prefer using annotations.

As a side note, there are reflection tools available, which supports the functionality you implemented in TestSupport. One such example is ReflectionTestUtils.

Perhaps better still is to use constructor injection:

public class ProductionCodeClass {

    private final DependencyClass dependency;

    @Inject
    public ProductionCodeClass(DependencyClass dependency) {
        this.dependency = dependency;
    }
}

The main advantage here is that it is clear what classes the class depends on, and that it cannot easily be constructed without providing all the dependencies. Also, it allows the injected class to be final.

By doing this, @InjectMocks is not necessary. Instead, just create the class by providing the mock as a parameter to the constructor:

public class ProductionCodeClassTest {

    @Mock
    private DependencyClass dependency;

    private ProductionCodeClass testedInstance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
        testedInstance = new ProductionCodeClass(dependency);
    }

}