Best Powermock code snippet using org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl
...8import org.powermock.core.spi.PowerMockTestListener;9import org.powermock.reflect.Whitebox;10import org.powermock.tests.utils.PowerMockTestNotifier;11import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.PowerMockTestNotifierImpl;12import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl;13import java.lang.reflect.Method;14import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;15import java.util.LinkedList;16import java.util.List;17/**18 * Since {@link TestClassMethodsRunner} creates a new instance of19 * TestInterceptor in its constructor we need to manually lookup the additional20 * methods that should be added when extending from {@code TestCase}.21 */22public class PowerMockJUnit4LegacyTestClassMethodsRunner extends TestClassMethodsRunner {23 private final PowerMockTestNotifier powerMockTestNotifier;24 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")25 public PowerMockJUnit4LegacyTestClassMethodsRunner(Class<?> klass, PowerMockTestListener[] powerMockTestListeners) {26 super(klass);27 this.powerMockTestNotifier = new PowerMockTestNotifierImpl(powerMockTestListeners);28 List<Method> testMethods = Whitebox.getInternalState(this, "fTestMethods", TestClassMethodsRunner.class);29 testMethods.addAll(getAdditionalTestMethods(klass));30 }31 private List<Method> getAdditionalTestMethods(Class<?> klass) {32 List<Method> additionalMethods = new LinkedList<Method>();33 if (klass != null && klass.getSuperclass().equals(TestCase.class)) {34 /*35 * We now know that we need to add additional test methods because36 * JUnit4 ignores public methods with no @Test annotation when37 * extending from TestCase.38 */39 Method[] methods = klass.getMethods();40 for (Method method : methods) {41 if (isAdditionalTestMethod(method)) {42 additionalMethods.add(method);43 }44 }45 }46 return additionalMethods;47 }48 private boolean isAdditionalTestMethod(Method method) {49 return !method.isAnnotationPresent(Ignore.class) && method.getName().startsWith("test") && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())50 && method.getReturnType().equals(Void.TYPE) && method.getAnnotation(Test.class) == null;51 }52 @Override53 protected TestMethodRunner createMethodRunner(Object test, Method method, RunNotifier notifier) {54 return new PowerMockJUnit4LegacyTestMethodRunner(test, method, notifier, methodDescription(method), powerMockTestNotifier);55 }56 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")57 @Override58 public void run(RunNotifier notifier) {59 final List<Method> methods = Whitebox.getInternalState(this, "fTestMethods");60 if (methods.isEmpty())61 notifier.testAborted(getDescription(), new Exception("No runnable methods"));62 for (Method method : methods) {63 final StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl staticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl = new StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl();64 Class<?> testType = getTestClass();65 final ClassLoader thisClassLoader = getClass().getClassLoader();66 if (!thisClassLoader.equals(testType.getClassLoader())) {67 /*68 * The test is loaded from another classloader, this means that69 * we cannot get the correct annotations if we don't load the70 * class from the correct class loader71 */72 try {73 testType = thisClassLoader.loadClass(testType.getName());74 } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {75 // This should never happen76 throw new RuntimeException("Internal error in PowerMock", e);77 }...
StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl
Using AI Code Generation
1[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:testResources (default-testResources) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---2[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---3[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.1:test (default-test) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---4[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---5[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-source-plugin:3.0.1:jar-no-fork (attach-sources) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---6[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (attach-javadocs) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---7[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.4:install (default-install) @ powermock-api-mockito2 ---
StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl
Using AI Code Generation
1import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.mockStatic;2import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;3import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;4import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl;5import com.example.demo.TestClass;6@PrepareForTest(TestClass.class)7public class TestClassTest {8 public void test() {9 mockStatic(TestClass.class, new StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl());10 PowerMockito.suppress(PowerMockito.constructor(TestClass.class));11 new TestClass();12 }13}
StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl
Using AI Code Generation
1package org.powermock.tests.utils.impl;2import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;3import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressExtractorImpl;4import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImpl;5import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest;6import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass;7import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass1;8import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass2;9import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass3;10import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass4;11import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass5;12import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass6;13import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass7;14import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass8;15import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass9;16import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass10;17import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass11;18import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass12;19import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass13;20import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass14;21import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass15;22import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass16;23import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass17;24import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass18;25import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass19;26import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass20;27import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImplTest.TestClass21;28import org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.suppression.StaticConstructorSuppressorImpl
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
As part of one of my consulting efforts, I worked with a mid-sized company that was looking to move toward a more agile manner of developing software. As with any shift in work style, there is some bewilderment and, for some, considerable anxiety. People are being challenged to leave their comfort zones and embrace a continuously changing, dynamic working environment. And, dare I say it, testing may be the most ‘disturbed’ of the software roles in agile development.
Unit testing is typically software testing within the developer domain. As the QA role expands in DevOps, QAOps, DesignOps, or within an Agile team, QA testers often find themselves creating unit tests. QA testers may create unit tests within the code using a specified unit testing tool, or independently using a variety of methods.
The QA testing career includes following an often long, winding road filled with fun, chaos, challenges, and complexity. Financially, the spectrum is broad and influenced by location, company type, company size, and the QA tester’s experience level. QA testing is a profitable, enjoyable, and thriving career choice.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!