How to use Require.StateChecker class of org.openqa.selenium.internal package

Why to migrate? You can use JUnit for unit-testing and another framework for higher-level testing. In your case it is a kind of acceptance or functional or end-to-end, it is not that important how you name it. But important is to understand that these tests are not unit. They stick to different rules: they are more complex, run longer and less often, they require complex setup, external dependencies and may sporadically fail. Why not use another framework for them (or even another programming language)?

Possible variants are:

• BDD frameworks: already mentioned Cucumber, JDave, JBehave, Spock. For instance, Spock is JUnit based and Groovy =)
• TestNG

If adding another framework is not an option: you enumerated more options for JUnit then I could imagine =) I would put the whole test script for the flow in one test method and would organize test code into "Drivers". That means that your end-to-end tests do not call the methods of your application or Selenium API directly, but wrap them into methods of Driver components which hide API complexity and look like statements of what happens or what is expected. Look at the example:

@Test 
public void sniperWinsAnAuctionByBiddingHigher() throws Exception {
    auction.startSellingItem();

    application.startBiddingIn(auction);
    auction.hasReceivedJoinRequestFrom(ApplicationRunner.SNIPER_XMPP_ID);

    auction.reportPrice(1000, 98, "other bidder");
    application.hasShownSniperIsBidding(auction, 1000, 1098);

    auction.hasReceivedBid(1098, ApplicationRunner.SNIPER_XMPP_ID);

    auction.reportPrice(1098, 97, ApplicationRunner.SNIPER_XMPP_ID);
    application.hasShownSniperIsWinning(auction, 1098);

    auction.announceClosed();
    application.hasShownSniperHasWonAuction(auction, 1098);
} 

A snippet is taken from the "Growing Object-Oriented Software Guided by Tests". The book is really great and I highly recommend to read it.

This is real end-to-end test that uses real XMPP connection, Openfire jabber server and WindowLicker Swing GUI-testing framework. But all this stuff if offloaded to Driver components. And in your test you just see how different actors communicate. And it is ordered: after application started bidding we check that auction server received join request, then we instruct auction server to report new price and check that it is reflected in UI and so on. The whole code is available on github.

The example on github is complex, because the application is not as trivial as it usually happens with book examples. But that book gives it gradually and I was able to built the whole application from scratch following the book guide. In fact, it is the sole book I ever read on TDD and automated developer testing that gives such a thorough and complete example. And I've read quite a lot of them. But note, that Driver approach does not make your tests unit. It just allows you hide complexity. And it can (and should) be used with other frameworks too. They just give you additional possibilities to split your tests into sequential steps if you need; to write a user readable test cases; to externalize test data into CSV,Excel tables, XML files or database, to timeout your tests; to integrate with external systems, servlet and DI containers; to define and run separately test groups; to give more user-friendly reports and so on.

And about making all your tests unit. It is not possible for anything excluding something like utility libraries for math, string processing and so on. If you have application that is completely unit tested that it means either that you test not all application or you do not understand what tests are unit and what are not. The first case may be OK, but everything that is not covered must be tested and retested manually by developers, testers, users or whoever. It is quite common but it better to be conscious decision rather than casual one. Why you cannot unit test everything?

There are a lot of definitions of unit tests and it leads to holy war) I prefer the following: "Unit test is test for program unit in isolation". Some people say: "hey, unit is my application! I test login and it is simple unit function". But there is also pragmatics that hides in isolation. Why do we need to differ unit tests from others? Because it is our first safety net. They must be fast. You commit often (to git, for example) and you run them at least before each commit. But imagine, that "unit" tests takes 5 minutes to run. You will either run them less often or you will commit less often or you will run just one test case or even one test method at the time, or you will wait say each 2 minutes for tests to complete in 5 minutes. An in that 5 minutes you'll go to Coding Horror where you'll spend the next 2 hours =) And unit tests must never fail sporadically. If they do that - you will not trust them. Hence, the isolation: you must isolate slowness and sources of sporadic failures from your unit tests. Hence, isolation means that unit tests should not use:

• File system
• Network, Sockets, RMI and so on
• GUI
• Multithreading
• External libraries expecting test framework and supporting simple libraries like Hamcrest

And unit tests must be local. You want to have just one or so tests failing when you've made a defect within 2 minutes of coding, not a half of the whole suite. That means that you are very limited in testing stateful behavior in unit tests. You should not make a test setup that makes 5 state transitions to reach preconditions. Because fail in first transition will break at least 4 tests for following transitions and one more test that you currently write for the 6th transition. And any non-trivial application has quite a lot of flows and state transitions in it. So this cannot be unit tested. For the same reason unit tests must not use changeable shared state in database, static fields, Spring context or whatever. This is exactly the reason why JUnit creates new instance of test class for every test method.

So, you see, you cannot fully unit test a web app, no matter how you recode it. Because it has flows, JSPs, servlet container and probably more. Of course, you can just ignore this definition, but it is damn useful) If you agree that distinguishing unit tests from other tests is useful, and this definition helps to achieve that then you'll go for another framework or at least another approach for tests that are not unit, you'll create separate suites for separate kinds of test and so on.

Hope, this will help)

driver.findElement(By.id("26110162")).isSelected();

or

String str = driver.findElement(By.id("26110162")).getAttribute("checked");
if (str.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
{
    System.out.println("Checkbox selected");
}

if the ID is changing... use the following XPATH:

//input[span='Seleccionar como tarjeta predeterminada']

or

//input[@name='address' and @type='radio']

Make sure you do this. Note sure if you are using Gradle, Maven or ANT. But the following concept is very similar to any build system.

1. You must be having a .war/.ear app artifact that you need to run behind Tomcat / similar.
   • You also need to make sure that you compiled your main code in debug mode, or jacoco will not be happy.
   • For ex: -g option in Java and similar debug option (if you are using groovy).

tasks.withType(Compile) {
    options.debug = true
    options.compilerArgs = ["-g"]
}

2. Lets say you have the .war and using Tomcat. Then while starting Tomcat.
   • In Tomcat start script, make sure you are telling Tomcat's JVM where's jacocoagent.jar file and passing other parameters. THIS is the MAIN missing point sometime we see (aka not attaching jacoco to target JVM's session and trying to get code coverage).

For ex: I start my Tomcat script with the following parameter passed to Tomcat (-Dxxxx=value way)

PROJ_EXTRA_JVM_OPTS=-javaagent:tomcat/jacocoagent.jar=destfile=build/jacoco/ST/jacocoST.exec,append=false

Basically, Tomcat start script would have -Dparameter=value, you can pass the above parameter (Linux/Unix export the variable) to Tomcat/Target JVM's scope.

The above parameter line when sent to Tomcat, will attach JACOCO agent .jar file to the "TARGET" (aka Tomcat JVM). Here you are telling Tomcat that go look for jacocoagent.jar file from a director called "tomcat" under your workspace. It's gonna create a jacoco .exec file named "jacocoST.exec" (aka jacoco exec file for Selenium Test) under build/jacoco/ST folder (I'm using Gradle so Gradle creates "build" folder anytime you run a build/compile/test/integrationTest/customSeleniumTaskThatYouMightHaveCreated).

NOTE: This means, that you DON'T have to specify jacoco section in the test task (as that'll run in your BUILD systems' JVM either Gradle or Maven or ANT whatever you have).

//We don't need jacoco for non-unit tests type of tasks as Jacoco won't be able to find any coverage if done this way. Jacoco agent file needs to be attached/visible to the TARGET's JVM (where you run your application via a .war / .ear etc).

jacoco { 
  //  ... As Gradle runs Unit tests (while doing build), they run free, in the same JVM where Gradle runs the build so Unit test have visibility to the main classes in the same JVM (which Gradle is using to run the build). Thus, you can use jacoco section in Gradle for running unit tests. BUT,
  // ... Don't use this section for running Integration, Acceptance, Selenium tests which run on a target JVM. Instead attach jacocoagent.jar and specify jacoco parameters to the target JVM.
}

3. Once you have your Tomcat up and running, now you run your Selenium tests. NOTE: -- I'm using Jenkins on Linux/Unix machine and "xvfb" plugin is very handy i.e. now I can run Selenium GUI tests in HEADLESS mode and I won't bug any user on a machine where the tests are running by popping up the tests pages while the GUI tests are running.

   -- if you end up using "xvfb" plugin in Jenkins, you FIRST need to start "Xvfb" service on the server (Linux/Unix) where you are running the tests.

   -- If you are running your non-units tests (aka Integration/Selenium etc) on a Windows machine, then you can see the GUI tests pop up when you run your tests. If you don't want to see the popup windows, then your Jenkins instance can run the slave (your windows machine) process as a service ("Install as a Service"). If you create your windows machine as a slave, when you run the JLNP installation on your machine, You'll see a popup that Jenkins has successfully started a slave process, clicking File > Install as a service will run your slave on a windows machine as "HEADLESS".

4. While your tests are running, you'll notice that this time, jacoco will create a folder structure/exec file as per your defined value for destfile parameter but it'll still be 0 or some small size.

5. Once your Selenium/non-unit tests are complete, you have to "STOP" Tomcat / target JVM. This will FLUSH all jacoco coverage info to this jacocoST.exec file (custom file that you wanted jacoco to create). -- Note: If you want jacocoST.exec file to be flushed on the fly (without requiring the Tomcat JVM/session to stop, then you can look into jacoco documentation how to do that, there is one topic there which tells about this, this way your application can continue to run and you dont have to stop your application/webservice).

6. Run jacocoTestReport task and you'll see jacoco code coverage.

   • Make sure you specify where are your sources/classes for main code.

for ex:

  jacocoTestReport {
      group = "Reporting"
      description = "Generate Jacoco coverage reports after running tests."
      ignoreFailures = true


      //UT=is for Unit tests, IT=integrationTest, AT=acceptanceTest, ST=Selenium GUI tests.
      //executionData = files('build/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.exec')
      //executionData = files('build/jacoco/IT/jacocoIT.exec')
      //executionData = files('build/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.exec', 'build/jacoco/IT/jacocoIT.exec')

      //executionData = files(['build/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.exec', 'build/jacoco/IT/jacocoIT.exec'])
      //OR use the following way for all.
      executionData = fileTree(dir: 'build/jacoco', include: '**/*.exec')

      reports {
             xml{
                 enabled true
                 //Following value is a file
                 destination "${buildDir}/reports/jacoco/xml/jacoco.xml"
             }
             csv.enabled false
             html{
                 enabled true
                 //Following value is a folder
                 destination "${buildDir}/reports/jacoco/html"
             }
      }

      //sourceDirectories = files(sourceSets.main.allJava.srcDirs)
      sourceDirectories = files('src/java')
      //sourceDirectories = files(['src/java','src/groovy'])
      classDirectories =  files('build/classes/main')

      //------------------------------------------
      //additionalSourceDirs = files(['test/java','test/groovy','src/java-test', 'src/groovy-test'])
      //additionalSourceDirs += files('src/java-test')
}

Feel free to ping me if you still see any issues. You can also see few of my posts here on stackoverflow on how I achieved this and also publishing the same coverage to SonarQube.

You can also check pageloaded using following code

IWait<IWebDriver> wait = new OpenQA.Selenium.Support.UI.WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30.00));

 wait.Until(driver1 => ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return document.readyState").Equals("complete"));

I had the same problem. @Karna and @Axl helped me figure it out. I was using import java.util.NoSuchElementException; instead of import org.openqa.selenium.NoSuchElementException;.

You need to wait for Javascript and jQuery to finish loading. Execute Javascript to check if jQuery.active is 0 and document.readyState is complete, which means the JS and jQuery load is complete.

public boolean waitForJSandJQueryToLoad() {

    WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, 30);

    // wait for jQuery to load
    ExpectedCondition<Boolean> jQueryLoad = new ExpectedCondition<Boolean>() {
      @Override
      public Boolean apply(WebDriver driver) {
        try {
          return ((Long)((JavascriptExecutor)getDriver()).executeScript("return jQuery.active") == 0);
        }
        catch (Exception e) {
          // no jQuery present
          return true;
        }
      }
    };

    // wait for Javascript to load
    ExpectedCondition<Boolean> jsLoad = new ExpectedCondition<Boolean>() {
      @Override
      public Boolean apply(WebDriver driver) {
        return ((JavascriptExecutor)getDriver()).executeScript("return document.readyState")
        .toString().equals("complete");
      }
    };

  return wait.until(jQueryLoad) && wait.until(jsLoad);
}

The answer to this was frustratingly simple. The XPATH I was using was not specific enough and returning multiple objects when I thought it was only returning one, it then was directing Seleniums attention to the first in the array which was not visible (as it correctly reporting).

Once I changed my method to return the array of matching objects and simply cycle through until I found one that was both enabled and displayed to use Robert was my mothers brother.

The dodgy XPATH issue comes from the fact that I checked the XPATH within firepath (in firefox) and this was correctly highlighting the object I wanted but selenium could somehow actually multiples of the same object (despite the page source not showing more than 1 object) and this wasn't highlighted to me until I used the firefox Selenium addin to record my actions.

So the lesson learned here is to not trust an XPATH generated via firepath 100% if it doesnt appear to be working without checking in the Selenium IDE first...!

According to the source code of selenium java bindings, findElementByXPath() basically is just a shortcut to findElement(By.xpath, ...):

public WebElement findElementByXPath(String using) {
    return findElement("xpath", using);
}

This should do the trick:

driver.switchTo().alert().accept();