How to use MockResolverTest class of org.mockitousage.plugins.resolver package

Best method is to use WireMock. Add the following dependencies:

    <dependency>
        <groupId>com.github.tomakehurst</groupId>
        <artifactId>wiremock</artifactId>
        <version>2.4.1</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
        <groupId>org.igniterealtime.smack</groupId>
        <artifactId>smack-core</artifactId>
        <version>4.0.6</version>
    </dependency>

Define and use the wiremock as shown below

@Rule
public WireMockRule wireMockRule = new WireMockRule(8089);

String response ="Hello world";
StubMapping responseValid = stubFor(get(urlEqualTo(url)).withHeader("Content-Type", equalTo("application/json"))
            .willReturn(aResponse().withStatus(200)
                    .withHeader("Content-Type", "application/json").withBody(response)));

Mockito matchers are static methods and calls to those methods, which stand in for arguments during calls to when and verify.

Hamcrest matchers (archived version) (or Hamcrest-style matchers) are stateless, general-purpose object instances that implement Matcher<T> and expose a method matches(T) that returns true if the object matches the Matcher's criteria. They are intended to be free of side effects, and are generally used in assertions such as the one below.

/* Mockito */  verify(foo).setPowerLevel(gt(9000));
/* Hamcrest */ assertThat(foo.getPowerLevel(), is(greaterThan(9000)));

Mockito matchers exist, separate from Hamcrest-style matchers, so that descriptions of matching expressions fit directly into method invocations: Mockito matchers return T where Hamcrest matcher methods return Matcher objects (of type Matcher<T>).

Mockito matchers are invoked through static methods such as eq, any, gt, and startsWith on org.mockito.Matchers and org.mockito.AdditionalMatchers. There are also adapters, which have changed across Mockito versions:

• For Mockito 1.x, Matchers featured some calls (such as intThat or argThat) are Mockito matchers that directly accept Hamcrest matchers as parameters. ArgumentMatcher<T> extended org.hamcrest.Matcher<T>, which was used in the internal Hamcrest representation and was a Hamcrest matcher base class instead of any sort of Mockito matcher.
• For Mockito 2.0+, Mockito no longer has a direct dependency on Hamcrest. Matchers calls phrased as intThat or argThat wrap ArgumentMatcher<T> objects that no longer implement org.hamcrest.Matcher<T> but are used in similar ways. Hamcrest adapters such as argThat and intThat are still available, but have moved to MockitoHamcrest instead.

Regardless of whether the matchers are Hamcrest or simply Hamcrest-style, they can be adapted like so:

/* Mockito matcher intThat adapting Hamcrest-style matcher is(greaterThan(...)) */
verify(foo).setPowerLevel(intThat(is(greaterThan(9000))));

In the above statement: foo.setPowerLevel is a method that accepts an int. is(greaterThan(9000)) returns a Matcher<Integer>, which wouldn't work as a setPowerLevel argument. The Mockito matcher intThat wraps that Hamcrest-style Matcher and returns an int so it can appear as an argument; Mockito matchers like gt(9000) would wrap that entire expression into a single call, as in the first line of example code.

What matchers do/return

when(foo.quux(3, 5)).thenReturn(true);

When not using argument matchers, Mockito records your argument values and compares them with their equals methods.

when(foo.quux(eq(3), eq(5))).thenReturn(true);    // same as above
when(foo.quux(anyInt(), gt(5))).thenReturn(true); // this one's different

When you call a matcher like any or gt (greater than), Mockito stores a matcher object that causes Mockito to skip that equality check and apply your match of choice. In the case of argumentCaptor.capture() it stores a matcher that saves its argument instead for later inspection.

Matchers return dummy values such as zero, empty collections, or null. Mockito tries to return a safe, appropriate dummy value, like 0 for anyInt() or any(Integer.class) or an empty List<String> for anyListOf(String.class). Because of type erasure, though, Mockito lacks type information to return any value but null for any() or argThat(...), which can cause a NullPointerException if trying to "auto-unbox" a null primitive value.

Matchers like eq and gt take parameter values; ideally, these values should be computed before the stubbing/verification starts. Calling a mock in the middle of mocking another call can interfere with stubbing.

Matcher methods can't be used as return values; there is no way to phrase thenReturn(anyInt()) or thenReturn(any(Foo.class)) in Mockito, for instance. Mockito needs to know exactly which instance to return in stubbing calls, and will not choose an arbitrary return value for you.

Implementation details

Matchers are stored (as Hamcrest-style object matchers) in a stack contained in a class called ArgumentMatcherStorage. MockitoCore and Matchers each own a ThreadSafeMockingProgress instance, which statically contains a ThreadLocal holding MockingProgress instances. It's this MockingProgressImpl that holds a concrete ArgumentMatcherStorageImpl. Consequently, mock and matcher state is static but thread-scoped consistently between the Mockito and Matchers classes.

Most matcher calls only add to this stack, with an exception for matchers like and, or, and not. This perfectly corresponds to (and relies on) the evaluation order of Java, which evaluates arguments left-to-right before invoking a method:

when(foo.quux(anyInt(), and(gt(10), lt(20)))).thenReturn(true);
[6]      [5]  [1]       [4] [2]     [3]

This will:

1. Add anyInt() to the stack.
2. Add gt(10) to the stack.
3. Add lt(20) to the stack.
4. Remove gt(10) and lt(20) and add and(gt(10), lt(20)).
5. Call foo.quux(0, 0), which (unless otherwise stubbed) returns the default value false. Internally Mockito marks quux(int, int) as the most recent call.
6. Call when(false), which discards its argument and prepares to stub method quux(int, int) identified in 5. The only two valid states are with stack length 0 (equality) or 2 (matchers), and there are two matchers on the stack (steps 1 and 4), so Mockito stubs the method with an any() matcher for its first argument and and(gt(10), lt(20)) for its second argument and clears the stack.

This demonstrates a few rules:

• Mockito can't tell the difference between quux(anyInt(), 0) and quux(0, anyInt()). They both look like a call to quux(0, 0) with one int matcher on the stack. Consequently, if you use one matcher, you have to match all arguments.

• Call order isn't just important, it's what makes this all work. Extracting matchers to variables generally doesn't work, because it usually changes the call order. Extracting matchers to methods, however, works great.

  int between10And20 = and(gt(10), lt(20));
  /* BAD */ when(foo.quux(anyInt(), between10And20)).thenReturn(true);
  // Mockito sees the stack as the opposite: and(gt(10), lt(20)), anyInt().
  
  public static int anyIntBetween10And20() { return and(gt(10), lt(20)); }
  /* OK */  when(foo.quux(anyInt(), anyIntBetween10And20())).thenReturn(true);
  // The helper method calls the matcher methods in the right order.
  

• The stack changes often enough that Mockito can't police it very carefully. It can only check the stack when you interact with Mockito or a mock, and has to accept matchers without knowing whether they're used immediately or abandoned accidentally. In theory, the stack should always be empty outside of a call to when or verify, but Mockito can't check that automatically. You can check manually with Mockito.validateMockitoUsage().

• In a call to when, Mockito actually calls the method in question, which will throw an exception if you've stubbed the method to throw an exception (or require non-zero or non-null values). doReturn and doAnswer (etc) do not invoke the actual method and are often a useful alternative.

• If you had called a mock method in the middle of stubbing (e.g. to calculate an answer for an eq matcher), Mockito would check the stack length against that call instead, and likely fail.

• If you try to do something bad, like stubbing/verifying a final method, Mockito will call the real method and also leave extra matchers on the stack. The final method call may not throw an exception, but you may get an InvalidUseOfMatchersException from the stray matchers when you next interact with a mock.

Common problems

• InvalidUseOfMatchersException:

  • Check that every single argument has exactly one matcher call, if you use matchers at all, and that you haven't used a matcher outside of a when or verify call. Matchers should never be used as stubbed return values or fields/variables.

  • Check that you're not calling a mock as a part of providing a matcher argument.

  • Check that you're not trying to stub/verify a final method with a matcher. It's a great way to leave a matcher on the stack, and unless your final method throws an exception, this might be the only time you realize the method you're mocking is final.

• NullPointerException with primitive arguments: (Integer) any() returns null while any(Integer.class) returns 0; this can cause a NullPointerException if you're expecting an int instead of an Integer. In any case, prefer anyInt(), which will return zero and also skip the auto-boxing step.

• NullPointerException or other exceptions: Calls to when(foo.bar(any())).thenReturn(baz) will actually call foo.bar(null), which you might have stubbed to throw an exception when receiving a null argument. Switching to doReturn(baz).when(foo).bar(any()) skips the stubbed behavior.

General troubleshooting

• Use MockitoJUnitRunner, or explicitly call validateMockitoUsage in your tearDown or @After method (which the runner would do for you automatically). This will help determine whether you've misused matchers.

• For debugging purposes, add calls to validateMockitoUsage in your code directly. This will throw if you have anything on the stack, which is a good warning of a bad symptom.

After a lot more hunting around and looking at all the options Mockito/Powermock had to offer, I found the solution (which I will share in case others run into this same issue).

When you have private member variables that are never initialized (and just assumed created in other places), you can use the @InjectMocks annotation to "inject" Mocks you want into your class you are testing.

1. Add a variable in your test class for the class you are testing, and give it the annotation @InjectMocks (org.Mockito.InjectMocks).
2. Use @Mock annotations to setup the mocks you want to inject. Use the @Mock (name = "privateVariableNameHere") name property to map the Mock object to the private variable inside your class you are testing.
3. In either a setup function or before you call your class, initialize the mocks. The easiest way I have found is to use a "setup" method with the @Before annotation. Then inside there call MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); to quickly initialize anything with the @Mock annotation.
4. Define your Mock functionality in your test method (before calling the method you are testing).
5. Using the @InjectMock object, call your method you are testing... the mocks SHOULD be hooked in and working as defined in the earlier steps.

So for the example class I use above, the code to test/mock would have Connection returned as a mock which you can do whatever with. Based on the example above in my question, this is what the code would look like:

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest({/* Static Classes I am Mocking */})
public class ExampleTest {
  @Mock (name = "queueFactory") //same name as private var.
  QueueConnectionFactory queueFactoryMock;
  @Mock
  Connection connectionMock; //the object we want returned
  @InjectMocks
  Example exampleTester; //the class to test

  @Before
  public void setup(){
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); // initialize all the @Mock objects
    // Setup other Static Mocks
  }

  @Test
  public void testTestMe(){
    //Mock your objects like other "normally" mocked objects
    PowerMockito.when(queueFactoryMock.createConnection()).thenReturn(connectionMock);
    //...Mock ConnectionMock functionality...
    exampleTester.testMe();
  }
}

JUnit 5 has @TestInstance(PER_CLASS) annotation that can be used for this purpose. One of the features that it enables is non-static BeforeAll and AfterAll methods:

@TestInstance(PER_CLASS)
class BeforeAllTests {

    lateinit var isInit = false

    @BeforeAll
    fun setup() {
        isInit = true
    }

   @TestFactory
   fun beforeAll() = listOf(
       should("initialize isInit in BeforeAll") {
           assertTrue(isInit)
       }
   )
}

fun should(name: String, test: () -> Unit) = DynamicTest.dynamicTest("should $name", test)

Follow these steps may help:

1.mock it (ex. mockito)

CloseableHttpResponse response = mock(CloseableHttpResponse.class);
HttpEntity entity = mock(HttpEntity.class);

2.apply some rules

when(response.getStatusLine()).thenReturn(new BasicStatusLine(HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpStatus.SC_OK, "FINE!"));
when(entity.getContent()).thenReturn(getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("result.txt"));
when(response.getEntity()).thenReturn(entity);

3.use it

when(httpClient.execute((HttpGet) any())).thenReturn(response);

In my case, I had a similar issue when I worked with JUnit5

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class MyServiceTest {
...

@InjectMocks
MyService underTest;

@Test
void myMethodTest() {
...
}

underTest was null. The cause of the problem was that I used @Test from JUnit4 package import org.junit.Test; instead JUnit5 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

Assuming the following method to test:

public boolean doSomething(SomeClass arg);

Mockito documentation says that you should not use captor in this way:

when(someObject.doSomething(argumentCaptor.capture())).thenReturn(true);
assertThat(argumentCaptor.getValue(), equalTo(expected));

Because you can just use matcher during stubbing:

when(someObject.doSomething(eq(expected))).thenReturn(true);

But verification is a different story. If your test needs to ensure that this method was called with a specific argument, use ArgumentCaptor and this is the case for which it is designed:

ArgumentCaptor<SomeClass> argumentCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(SomeClass.class);
verify(someObject).doSomething(argumentCaptor.capture());
assertThat(argumentCaptor.getValue(), equalTo(expected));

From what I read on "Issue 53" of mockito (https://code.google.com/p/mockito/issues/detail?id=53) , my code was experiencing a problem due to the validation framework involved in Mockito. Precisely the following code was causing the exception per se.

private ConstantNode getConstantNode(NumericalValue value){
    ConstantNode node = Mockito.mock(ConstantNode.class);
    Mockito.when(node.evaluate()).thenReturn(value);
    Mockito.when(node.toString()).thenReturn(value.toString());
    return node;
}

If you remember from my code, the parameter value is ALSO A MOCK, so that when value.toString() is called on the thenReturn(), I believe (and someone please correct me if I am wrong) that the validation framework is triggered and makes sure that every "when" has had its thenReturn() called/validated/etc. So that if this happenes, the Mockito.when(node.toString()).thenReturn(value.toString() will not be validated because it hasn´t returned from the valute.toString(), which started the whole "validate everything" chain.

How I fixed it:

private ConstantNode getConstantNode(NumericalValue value){
    ConstantNode node = Mockito.mock(ConstantNode.class);
    Mockito.when(node.evaluate()).thenReturn(value);

    String numberToString = value.toString();

    Mockito.when(node.toString()).thenReturn(numberToString);
    return node;
}

This way, it can be validated. I find this a complete code smell because I will literally have to leave a comment that explains why I am using a seemingly useless intermediate variable in the code.

Thanks for the help.

You probably want to populate a normal list with your mocked objects. E.g.

List<User> mockList = new ArrayList<>();

User mockUser1 = Mockito.mock(User.class);
// ...    

mockList.add(mockUser1);
// etc.

Note that by default, Mockito returns an empty collection for any mocked methods that returns a collection. So if you just want to return an empty list, Mockito will already do that for you.