How to use VerificationStartedNotifierTest class of org.mockito.internal.listeners package

Use MockitoAnnotations.initMocks to initiate the @Mock and @InjectMocks objects. Your test would look something like:

@Mock
FastPowering fastPower;

@InjectMocks
Controller controller;

@Before
public void setup() {
    MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}

@Test
public void test() {
    ....
}

You can use Mockito.spy (#spy):

baseClass object = new baseClass(new FetchData());
baseClass spy = Mockito.spy(object);

Mockito.when(spy.parse()).thenCallRealMethod();
Mockito.when(spy.transform()).thenReturn("Something");

Having such interface:

interface Foo {
    void method(String s);
}

One idea is to use regular expression matching:

final Foo mock = mock(Foo.class);
mock.method("abc");
verify(mock).method(matches(".{3}"));

Unfortunately there is no built-in matcher for string length (there should be!), but it's easy to write custom one:

private static String hasSize(final int size) {
    return argThat(new ArgumentMatcher<String>() {
        @Override
        public boolean matches(Object argument) {
            return argument.toString().length() == size;
        }
    });
}

Now simply call static method:

verify(mock).method(hasSize(4));

The nested generics-problem can be avoided with the @Captor annotation:

public class Test{

    @Mock
    private Service service;

    @Captor
    private ArgumentCaptor<ArrayList<SomeType>> captor;

    @Before
    public void init(){
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
    }

    @Test 
    public void shouldDoStuffWithListValues() {
        //...
        verify(service).doStuff(captor.capture()));
    }
}

As the error message suggests, you cannot mock final classes with the default Mockito.

But the community came up with mockito-inline, an extension bringing experimental features such as mocking final classes and methods or static methods.

Just add this in your pom.xml and use Mockito normally.

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
    <artifactId>mockito-inline</artifactId>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Mocks that return have the expectation that the return type matches the mocked object's return type.

Here's the mistake:

Mockito.when(remoteStore.get("a", "b")).thenReturn("lol");

"lol" isn't an Optional<String>, so it won't accept that as a valid return value.

The reason it worked when you did

Optional<Object> returnCacheValue = Optional.of((Object) returnCacheValueString);
Mockito.<Optional<Object>>when(remotestore.get("cache-name", "cache-key")).thenReturn(returnCacheValue);

is due to returnCacheValue being an Optional.

This is easy to fix: just change it to an Optional.of("lol") instead.

Mockito.when(remoteStore.get("a", "b")).thenReturn(Optional.of("lol"));

You can also do away with the type witnesses as well. The result above will be inferred to be Optional<String>.

Two more ways to do it (see my comment on the previous answer by @Tomasz Nurkiewicz):

The first relies on the fact that the compiler simply won't let you pass in something of the wrong type:

when(a.method(any(Class.class))).thenReturn(b);

You lose the exact typing (the Class<? extends A>) but it probably works as you need it to.

The second is a lot more involved but is arguably a better solution if you really want to be sure that the argument to method() is an A or a subclass of A:

when(a.method(Matchers.argThat(new ClassOrSubclassMatcher<A>(A.class)))).thenReturn(b);

Where ClassOrSubclassMatcher is an org.hamcrest.BaseMatcher defined as:

public class ClassOrSubclassMatcher<T> extends BaseMatcher<Class<T>> {

    private final Class<T> targetClass;

    public ClassOrSubclassMatcher(Class<T> targetClass) {
        this.targetClass = targetClass;
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public boolean matches(Object obj) {
        if (obj != null) {
            if (obj instanceof Class) {
                return targetClass.isAssignableFrom((Class<T>) obj);
            }
        }
        return false;
    }

    public void describeTo(Description desc) {
        desc.appendText("Matches a class or subclass");
    }       
}

Phew! I'd go with the first option until you really need to get finer control over what method() actually returns :-)

Even more meaningful :

import static org.mockito.Mockito.never;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;

// ...

verify(dependency, never()).someMethod();

The documentation of this feature is there §4 "Verifying exact number of invocations / at least x / never", and the never javadoc is here.

I think it should be

verify(mockBar, times(2)).doSomething(...)

Sample from mockito javadoc:

ArgumentCaptor<Person> peopleCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Person.class);
verify(mock, times(2)).doSomething(peopleCaptor.capture());

List<Person> capturedPeople = peopleCaptor.getAllValues();
assertEquals("John", capturedPeople.get(0).getName());
assertEquals("Jane", capturedPeople.get(1).getName());