Discover AI-native insights at Testμ Conference‘25

How to use OffsetDateTimeAssert_isAfterOrEqualTo_Test class of org.assertj.core.api.offsetdatetime package

Best Assertj code snippet using org.assertj.core.api.offsetdatetime.OffsetDateTimeAssert_isAfterOrEqualTo_Test

Source: OffsetDateTimeAssert_isAfterOrEqualTo_Test.java

...22 * @author Pawe? Stawicki23 * @author Joel Costigliola24 * @author Marcin Zaj?czkowski25 */26public class OffsetDateTimeAssert_isAfterOrEqualTo_Test extends OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest {27    @Test28    public void test_isAfterOrEqual_assertion() {29        // WHEN30        Assertions.assertThat(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.AFTER).isAfterOrEqualTo(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE);31        Assertions.assertThat(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.AFTER).isAfterOrEqualTo(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE.toString());32        Assertions.assertThat(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE).isAfterOrEqualTo(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE);33        Assertions.assertThat(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE).isAfterOrEqualTo(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE.toString());34        // THEN35        OffsetDateTimeAssert_isAfterOrEqualTo_Test.verify_that_isAfterOrEqual_assertion_fails_and_throws_AssertionError(OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.BEFORE, OffsetDateTimeAssertBaseTest.REFERENCE);36    }37    @Test38    public void test_isAfterOrEqual_assertion_error_message() {39        Assertions.assertThatExceptionOfType(AssertionError.class).isThrownBy(() -> assertThat(of(2000, 1, 5, 3, 0, 5, 0, ZoneOffset.UTC)).isAfterOrEqualTo(of(2012, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3, 0, ZoneOffset.UTC))).withMessage(String.format(("%n" + ((("Expecting:%n" + "  <2000-01-05T03:00:05Z>%n") + "to be after or equals to:%n") + "  <2012-01-01T03:03:03Z>"))));40    }41    @Test42    public void should_fail_if_actual_is_null() {43        Assertions.assertThatExceptionOfType(AssertionError.class).isThrownBy(() -> {44            OffsetDateTime actual = null;45            assertThat(actual).isAfterOrEqualTo(OffsetDateTime.now());46        }).withMessage(FailureMessages.actualIsNull());47    }48    @Test49    public void should_fail_if_dateTime_parameter_is_null() {...

Blogs

Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:

Testing in Production: A Detailed Guide

When most firms employed a waterfall development model, it was widely joked about in the industry that Google kept its products in beta forever. Google has been a pioneer in making the case for in-production testing. Traditionally, before a build could go live, a tester was responsible for testing all scenarios, both defined and extempore, in a testing environment. However, this concept is evolving on multiple fronts today. For example, the tester is no longer testing alone. Developers, designers, build engineers, other stakeholders, and end users, both inside and outside the product team, are testing the product and providing feedback.

Webinar: Building Selenium Automation Framework [Voices of Community]

Even though several frameworks are available in the market for automation testing, Selenium is one of the most renowned open-source frameworks used by experts due to its numerous features and benefits.

Fault-Based Testing and the Pesticide Paradox

In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.

Getting Rid of Technical Debt in Agile Projects

Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.

Two-phase Model-based Testing

Most test automation tools just do test execution automation. Without test design involved in the whole test automation process, the test cases remain ad hoc and detect only simple bugs. This solution is just automation without real testing. In addition, test execution automation is very inefficient.

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.