How to use GUIObjectDetailsTest class of com.paypal.selion.plugins package

These days, development teams depend heavily on feedback from automated tests to evaluate the quality of the system they are working on.

Even though several frameworks are available in the market for automation testing, Selenium is one of the most renowned open-source frameworks used by experts due to its numerous features and benefits.

In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.

There is just one area where each member of the software testing community has a distinct point of view! Metrics! This contentious issue sparks intense disputes, and most conversations finish with no definitive conclusion. It covers a wide range of topics: How can testing efforts be measured? What is the most effective technique to assess effectiveness? Which of the many components should be quantified? How can we measure the quality of our testing performance, among other things?

With the rise of Agile, teams have been trying to minimize the gap between the stakeholders and the development team.