Best Site_prism code snippet using SitePrism.component_matches
addressable_url_matcher.rb
Source: addressable_url_matcher.rb
...16 def mappings(url)17 uri = Addressable::URI.parse(url)18 result = {}19 COMPONENT_NAMES.each do |component|20 component_result = component_matches(component, uri)21 result = component_result ? result.merge!(component_result) : nil22 break unless result23 end24 result25 end26 # Determine whether URL matches our pattern, and optionally whether the extracted mappings match27 # a hash of expected values. You can specify values as strings, numbers or regular expressions.28 def matches?(url, expected_mappings = {})29 actual_mappings = mappings(url)30 if actual_mappings31 expected_mappings.empty? ? true : all_expected_mappings_match?(expected_mappings, actual_mappings)32 else33 false34 end35 end36 private37 def all_expected_mappings_match?(expected_mappings, actual_mappings)38 expected_mappings.all? do |key, expected_value|39 actual_value = actual_mappings[key.to_s]40 case expected_value41 when Numeric42 actual_value == expected_value.to_s43 when Regexp44 actual_value.match(expected_value)45 else46 expected_value == actual_value47 end48 end49 end50 # Memoizes the extracted component templates51 def component_templates52 @component_templates ||= extract_component_templates53 end54 def extract_component_templates55 COMPONENT_NAMES.each_with_object({}) do |component, component_templates|56 component_url = to_substituted_uri.public_send(component).to_s57 next unless component_url && component_url != ''58 reverse_substitutions.each_pair do |substituted_value, template_value|59 component_url = component_url.sub(substituted_value, template_value)60 end61 component_templates[component] = Addressable::Template.new(component_url.to_s)62 end.freeze63 end64 # Returns empty hash if the template omits the component, a set of substitutions if the65 # provided URI component matches the template component, or nil if the match fails.66 def component_matches(component, uri)67 extracted_mappings = {}68 component_template = component_templates[component]69 if component_template70 component_url = uri.public_send(component).to_s71 unless (extracted_mappings = component_template.extract(component_url))72 # to support Addressable's expansion of queries, ensure it's parsing the fragment as appropriate (e.g. {?params*})73 prefix = COMPONENT_PREFIXES[component]74 return nil unless prefix && (extracted_mappings = component_template.extract(prefix + component_url))75 end76 end77 extracted_mappings78 end79 # Convert the pattern into an Addressable URI by substituting the template slugs with nonsense strings.80 def to_substituted_uri...
component_matches
Using AI Code Generation
1 Capybara::Selenium::Driver.new(app, browser: :chrome)2 config.before(:each) do3 page.current_window.resize_to(1920, 1080)4 expect(results_page).to have_results(count: 10)5 should return results (FAILED - 1)6 Failure/Error: expect(results_page).to have_results(count: 10)
component_matches
Using AI Code Generation
1 def find_element(element)2 component_matches(element)3 def find_element(element)4 component_matches(element)5def number_to_words(num)
component_matches
Using AI Code Generation
1puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnK"]').count2puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnG"]').count3puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnK"]')[0].text4puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnG"]')[0].text5puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnK"]')[0].value6puts page.component_matches('//input[@name="btnG"]')[0].value
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
As a developer, checking the cross browser compatibility of your CSS properties is of utmost importance when building your website. I have often found myself excited to use a CSS feature only to discover that it’s still not supported on all browsers. Even if it is supported, the feature might be experimental and not work consistently across all browsers. Ask any front-end developer about using a CSS feature whose support is still in the experimental phase in most prominent web browsers. ????
There are times when developers get stuck with a problem that has to do with version changes. Trying to run the code or test without upgrading the package can result in unexpected errors.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
Have you ever struggled with handling hidden elements while automating a web or mobile application? I was recently automating an eCommerce application. I struggled with handling hidden elements on the web page.
Recently, I was going through some of the design patterns in Java by reading the book Head First Design Patterns by Eric Freeman, Elisabeth Robson, Bert Bates, and Kathy Sierra.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!