Best Site_prism code snippet using SitePrism._create_rspec_existence_matchers
rspec_matchers.rb
Source: rspec_matchers.rb
...4 attr_reader :element_name5 def initialize(element_name)6 @element_name = element_name7 end8 def _create_rspec_existence_matchers9 SitePrism.logger.debug('Including all relevant matcher names / warnings in RSpec scope.')10 create_rspec_existence_matchers(matcher, object_method, negated_object_method, warning)11 end12 private13 def create_rspec_existence_matchers(matcher, object_method, negated_object_method, warning)14 RSpec::Matchers.define(matcher) do |*args|15 match { |actual| actual.public_send(object_method, *args) }16 match_when_negated do |actual|17 if actual.respond_to?(negated_object_method)18 return actual.public_send(negated_object_method, *args)19 end20 SitePrism.logger.debug(warning)21 !actual.public_send(object_method, *args)22 end...
_create_rspec_existence_matchers
Using AI Code Generation
1 expect(subject).to have_element12 expect(subject).to have_element23 expect(subject).to have_element34 expect(subject).to_not have_element15 expect(subject).to_not have_element26 expect(subject).to_not have_element37 expect(subject).to have_element18 expect(subject).to_not have_element1
_create_rspec_existence_matchers
Using AI Code Generation
1 def self.create_rspec_existence_matchers(*elements)2 define_method(matcher_name) do3 send(element).exists?4 page.send(matcher_name)
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
As a developer, checking the cross browser compatibility of your CSS properties is of utmost importance when building your website. I have often found myself excited to use a CSS feature only to discover that it’s still not supported on all browsers. Even if it is supported, the feature might be experimental and not work consistently across all browsers. Ask any front-end developer about using a CSS feature whose support is still in the experimental phase in most prominent web browsers. ????
There are times when developers get stuck with a problem that has to do with version changes. Trying to run the code or test without upgrading the package can result in unexpected errors.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
Have you ever struggled with handling hidden elements while automating a web or mobile application? I was recently automating an eCommerce application. I struggled with handling hidden elements on the web page.
Recently, I was going through some of the design patterns in Java by reading the book Head First Design Patterns by Eric Freeman, Elisabeth Robson, Bert Bates, and Kathy Sierra.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!