Best Inspec_ruby code snippet using Inspec.to_yaml
inspec_waiver_file.rb
Source: inspec_waiver_file.rb
...44 waiver_hash["#{new_resource.control}"] = control_hash45 waiver_hash = waiver_hash.sort.to_h46 file "Update Waiver File #{new_resource.file} to update waiver for control #{new_resource.control}" do47 path new_resource.file48 content waiver_hash.to_yaml49 action :create50 end51 end52 else53 waiver_hash["#{new_resource.control}"] = {}54 waiver_hash["#{new_resource.control}"] = control_hash55 waiver_hash = waiver_hash.sort.to_h56 file "Update Waiver File #{new_resource.file} to add waiver for control #{new_resource.control}" do57 path new_resource.file58 content waiver_hash.to_yaml59 action :create60 end61 end62end63action :remove do64 filename = new_resource.file65 if ::File.file?(filename) && ::File.readable?(filename) && !::File.zero?(filename)66 yaml_contents = IO.read(filename)67 waiver_hash = ::YAML.safe_load(yaml_contents)68 if waiver_hash.key?("#{new_resource.control}")69 waiver_hash.delete("#{new_resource.control}")70 waiver_hash = waiver_hash.sort.to_h71 file "Update Waiver File #{new_resource.file} to remove waiver for control #{new_resource.control}" do72 path new_resource.file73 content waiver_hash.to_yaml74 action :create75 end76 end77 end78end
lockfile_test.rb
Source: lockfile_test.rb
1require 'helper'2describe Inspec::Lockfile do3 # Ruby 1.9: .to_yaml format is slightly different4 if Gem::Version.new(RUBY_VERSION) < Gem::Version.new("2.0")5 let(:lockfile_content) {6 <<EOF7---8lockfile_version: 19depends:10- name: foo11 resolved_source:12 url: http://foo13 version_constraints: ! '>= 0'14 dependencies:15 - name: bar16 resolved_source:17 url: http://bar18 version_constraints: ! '>= 0'19EOF20 }21 else22 let(:lockfile_content) {23 <<EOF24---25lockfile_version: 126depends:27- name: foo28 resolved_source:29 url: http://foo30 version_constraints: ">= 0"31 dependencies:32 - name: bar33 resolved_source:34 url: http://bar35 version_constraints: ">= 0"36EOF37 }38 end39 let(:lockfile_hash) {40 { 'lockfile_version' => 1,41 'depends' => [42 { 'name' => "foo", 'resolved_source' => {'url' => "http://foo"}, 'version_constraints' => ">= 0",43 'dependencies' => [{ 'name' => 'bar', 'resolved_source' => {'url' => 'http://bar' }, 'version_constraints' => ">= 0"}]44 }]}45 }46 let(:lockfile_hash_with_symbols) {47 { 'lockfile_version' => 1,48 'depends' => [49 { name: "foo", resolved_source: {url: "http://foo"}, version_constraints: ">= 0",50 dependencies: [{ name: 'bar', resolved_source: {url: 'http://bar' }, version_constraints: ">= 0"}]51 }]}52 }53 it "can generate a yaml representation of the lockfile" do54 l = Inspec::Lockfile.new(lockfile_hash)55 l.to_yaml.force_encoding("UTF-8").must_equal lockfile_content56 end57 it "can generates a yaml representation of the lockfile even when the depends keys are symbols" do58 l = Inspec::Lockfile.new(lockfile_hash_with_symbols)59 l.to_yaml.force_encoding("UTF-8").must_equal lockfile_content60 end61 it "uses symbol keys for the deps by default" do62 File.stubs(:read).with("testfile").returns(lockfile_content)63 l = Inspec::Lockfile.from_file("testfile")64 l.deps.must_equal lockfile_hash_with_symbols['depends']65 end66end
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1 it { should respond_to :to_yaml }2 it { should respond_to :to_json }3 it { should respond_to :to_s }4 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }5 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }6 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }7 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }8 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }9 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }10 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }11 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }12 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }13 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }14 it { should
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml2puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml3puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml4puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml5puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml6puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml7puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml8puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml9puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml10puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml11puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml12puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml13puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1 expect(true).to eq true2File.write('control.yml', control.to_yaml)3 expect(true).to eq true4File.write('control.json', control.to_json)5 expect(true).to eq true6File.write('control.rb', control.to_ruby)7 expect(true).to eq true8File.write('control.hash', control.to_hash)
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1data = YAML.load_file('2.yaml')2inspec.load(data)3File.open('3.yaml', 'w') do |file|4 file.write(inspec.to_yaml)
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1json_file = File.read('1.json')2ruby_hash = JSON.parse(json_file)3puts inspec.to_yaml(ruby_hash)4json_file = File.read('1.json')5ruby_hash = JSON.parse(json_file)6puts inspec.to_yaml(ruby_hash)
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1puts YAML.load(yaml)2puts YAML.load(yaml).to_yaml3 :registry: {}4:inputs: {}5 :attrs: {}6 :registry: {}7 :registry: {}8:profile_metadata: {}9 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }10 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }11 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }12 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }13 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }14 it { should respond_to :to_ruby }15 it { should
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml2puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml3puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml4puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml5puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml6puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml7puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml8puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml9puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml10puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml11puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml12puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar').to_yaml13puts Inspec::Input.new('foo', value: 'bar
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1 expect(true).to eq true2File.write('control.yml', control.to_yaml)3 expect(true).to eq true4File.write('control.json', control.to_json)5 expect(true).to eq true6File.write('control.rb', control.to_ruby)7 expect(true).to eq true8File.write('control.hash', control.to_hash)
to_yaml
Using AI Code Generation
1data = YAML.load_file('2.yaml')2inspec.load(data)3File.open('3.yaml', 'w') do |file|4 file.write(inspec.to_yaml)
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Continuous integration is a coding philosophy and set of practices that encourage development teams to make small code changes and check them into a version control repository regularly. Most modern applications necessitate the development of code across multiple platforms and tools, so teams require a consistent mechanism for integrating and validating changes. Continuous integration creates an automated way for developers to build, package, and test their applications. A consistent integration process encourages developers to commit code changes more frequently, resulting in improved collaboration and code quality.
People love to watch, read and interact with quality content — especially video content. Whether it is sports, news, TV shows, or videos captured on smartphones, people crave digital content. The emergence of OTT platforms has already shaped the way people consume content. Viewers can now enjoy their favorite shows whenever they want rather than at pre-set times. Thus, the OTT platform’s concept of viewing anything, anytime, anywhere has hit the right chord.
So, now that the first installment of this two fold article has been published (hence you might have an idea of what Agile Testing is not in my opinion), I’ve started feeling the pressure to explain what Agile Testing actually means to me.
The purpose of developing test cases is to ensure the application functions as expected for the customer. Test cases provide basic application documentation for every function, feature, and integrated connection. Test case development often detects defects in the design or missing requirements early in the development process. Additionally, well-written test cases provide internal documentation for all application processing. Test case development is an important part of determining software quality and keeping defects away from customers.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!