Best Python code snippet using localstack_python
service_models.py
Source: service_models.py
...86 raise UnformattedGetAttTemplateException()87 # ---------------------88 # GENERIC UTIL METHODS89 # ---------------------90 def fetch_and_update_state(self, *args, **kwargs):91 from localstack.utils.cloudformation import template_deployer92 try:93 state = self.fetch_state(*args, **kwargs)94 self.update_state(state)95 return state96 except Exception as e:97 if not template_deployer.check_not_found_exception(98 e, self.resource_type, self.properties99 ):100 LOG.debug("Unable to fetch state for resource %s: %s" % (self, e))101 def fetch_state_if_missing(self, *args, **kwargs):102 if not self.state:103 self.fetch_and_update_state(*args, **kwargs)104 return self.state105 def set_resource_state(self, state):106 """Set the deployment state of this resource."""107 self.state = state or {}108 def update_state(self, details):109 """Update the deployment state of this resource (existing attributes will be overwritten)."""110 details = details or {}111 self.state.update(details)112 return self.props113 @property114 def physical_resource_id(self):115 """Return the (cached) physical resource ID."""116 return self.resource_json.get("PhysicalResourceId")117 @property...
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
There is just one area where each member of the software testing community has a distinct point of view! Metrics! This contentious issue sparks intense disputes, and most conversations finish with no definitive conclusion. It covers a wide range of topics: How can testing efforts be measured? What is the most effective technique to assess effectiveness? Which of the many components should be quantified? How can we measure the quality of our testing performance, among other things?
Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
The events over the past few years have allowed the world to break the barriers of traditional ways of working. This has led to the emergence of a huge adoption of remote working and companies diversifying their workforce to a global reach. Even prior to this many organizations had already had operations and teams geographically dispersed.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!