Best Kluent code snippet using org.amshove.kluent.tests.numerical.ShouldBeNearShould.passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan
ShouldBeNearShould.kt
Source: ShouldBeNearShould.kt
...51 fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsTheUpperBound() {52 (5.6f).shouldBeNear(5.5f, 0.1f)53 }54 @Test55 fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {56 Float.NaN.shouldBeNear(Float.NaN, 0.1f)57 }58 @Test59 fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndInfinite() {60 Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY.shouldBeNear(Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY, 0.1f)61 }62 @Test63 fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNegativeInfinite() {64 Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY.shouldBeNear(Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY, 0.1f)65 }66 @Test67 fun failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsBelowTheBound() {68 assertFails {69 (5.3f).shouldBeNear(5.5f, 0.1f)...
passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan
Using AI Code Generation
1@DisplayName ( "passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { val result = 0.0f shouldBeNear 0.0f }2@DisplayName ( "failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { assertFails { 0.0f shouldBeNear Float . NaN } }3@DisplayName ( "failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { assertFails { 0.0f shouldBeNear Float . NaN } }4@DisplayName ( "passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { val result = 0.0f shouldBeNear 0.0f }5@DisplayName ( "failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { assertFails { 0.0f shouldBeNear Float . NaN } }6@DisplayName ( "failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan" ) @Test fun failWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan () { assertFails { 0.0f shouldBeNear Float . NaN } }
passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan
Using AI Code Generation
1public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {2 float expected = Float.NaN;3 float actual = Float.NaN;4 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);5}6public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndPosInf() {7 float expected = Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY;8 float actual = Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY;9 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);10}11public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNegInf() {12 float expected = Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;13 float actual = Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;14 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);15}16public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndPosMax() {17 float expected = Float.MAX_VALUE;18 float actual = Float.MAX_VALUE;19 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);20}21public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNegMax() {22 float expected = -Float.MAX_VALUE;23 float actual = -Float.MAX_VALUE;24 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);25}26public void passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndPosMin() {27 float expected = Float.MIN_VALUE;28 float actual = Float.MIN_VALUE;29 actual.shouldBeNear(expected, 0.0f);30}
passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan
Using AI Code Generation
1public void shouldPassWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {2 float a = Float.NaN;3 float b = Float.NaN;4 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0f);5}6public void shouldPassWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {7 double a = Double.NaN;8 double b = Double.NaN;9 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0);10}11public void shouldPassWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndInfinity() {12 float a = Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY;13 float b = Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY;14 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0f);15}16public void shouldPassWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndInfinity() {17 double a = Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY;18 double b = Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY;19 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0);20}21public void shouldPassWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNegativeInfinity() {22 float a = Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;23 float b = Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;24 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0f);25}26public void shouldPassWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNegativeInfinity() {27 double a = Double.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;28 double b = Double.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;29 a.shouldBeNear(b, 0.0);30}31@Test(expected = AssertionError.class)
passWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan
Using AI Code Generation
1fun shouldBeNearShouldPassWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {2 0.0f.shouldBeNear( 0.0f , 0.0f )3}4fun shouldBeNearShouldPassWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndNan() {5 0.0.shouldBeNear( 0.0 , 0.0 )6}7fun shouldBeNearShouldFailWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsNotEqualToExpectedAndNan() {8 shouldThrow<AssertionError> {9 1.0f.shouldBeNear( 0.0f , 0.0f )10 }11}12fun shouldBeNearShouldFailWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsNotEqualToExpectedAndNan() {13 shouldThrow<AssertionError> {14 1.0.shouldBeNear( 0.0 , 0.0 )15 }16}17fun shouldBeNearShouldPassWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndInfinity() {18 Float .POSITIVE_INFINITY.shouldBeNear( Float .POSITIVE_INFINITY, 0.0f )19}20fun shouldBeNearShouldPassWhenTestingADoubleWhichIsEqualToExpectedAndInfinity() {21 Double .POSITIVE_INFINITY.shouldBeNear( Double .POSITIVE_INFINITY, 0.0 )22}23fun shouldBeNearShouldFailWhenTestingAFloatWhichIsNotEqualToExpectedAndInfinity() {
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Unit and functional testing are the prime ways of verifying the JavaScript code quality. However, a host of tools are available that can also check code before or during its execution in order to test its quality and adherence to coding standards. With each tool having its unique features and advantages contributing to its testing capabilities, you can use the tool that best suits your need for performing JavaScript testing.
The key to successful test automation is to focus on tasks that maximize the return on investment (ROI), ensuring that you are automating the right tests and automating them in the right way. This is where test automation strategies come into play.
There are times when developers get stuck with a problem that has to do with version changes. Trying to run the code or test without upgrading the package can result in unexpected errors.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!