Best Kluent code snippet using org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo.passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
ShouldBeEquivalentTo.kt
Source: ShouldBeEquivalentTo.kt
...643 }644 }645 }646 @Test647 fun passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {648 // arrange649 val team1 = Team("team1").apply {650 persons = listOf(651 Person("John", "Johnson").apply {652 address = Address("Mainzerlandstrasse", "200", "Frankfurt am Main", "60327", "Germany")653 },654 Person("Marc", "Marcson").apply { birthDate = LocalDate.of(2020, 2, 1) }655 )656 }657 val team2 = Team("team1").apply {658 persons = listOf(659 Person("John", "Johnson"),660 Person("Marc", "Marcson")661 )...
passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.amshove.kluent.*2import org.jetbrains.spek.api.Spek3import kotlin.test.assertFails4class ShouldBeEquivalentToTests : Spek({5 given("the shouldBeEquivalentTo method") {6 on("comparing two equivalent objects") {7 it("should pass") {8 val person1 = Person("John", 20)9 val person2 = Person("John", 20)10 }11 }12 on("comparing two inequivalent objects") {13 it("should fail") {14 val person1 = Person("John", 20)15 val person2 = Person("John", 21)16 assertFails { person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 }17 }18 }19 on("comparing two equivalent objects that have different property names") {20 it("should pass") {21 val person1 = Person("John", 20)22 val person2 = Person("John", 20)23 }24 }25 on("comparing two inequivalent objects that have different property names") {26 it("should fail") {27 val person1 = Person("John", 20)28 val person2 = Person("John", 21)29 assertFails { person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 }30 }31 }32 on("comparing two equivalent objects that have different property types") {33 it("should pass") {34 val person1 = Person("John", 20)35 val person2 = Person("John", 20)36 }37 }38 on("comparing two inequivalent objects that have different property types") {39 it("should fail") {40 val person1 = Person("John", 20)41 val person2 = Person("John", 21)42 assertFails { person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 }43 }44 }45 on("comparing two equivalent objects that have a nested object") {46 it("should pass") {47 val person1 = PersonWithAddress("John", 20, Address("Street", "City"))48 val person2 = PersonWithAddress("John", 20, Address("Street", "City"))49 }50 }51 on("
passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo2val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()3import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo4val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()5import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo6val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()7import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo8val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()9import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo10val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()11import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo12val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()13import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo14val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()15import org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo16val shouldBeEquivalentTo = ShouldBeEquivalentTo()
passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1val a = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 2 val b = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 3 a . shouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects ( b ) 4val a = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 5 val b = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 6 a . shouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects ( b ) 7val a = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 8 val b = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42 , listOf ( "a" , "b" , "c" )) 9 a . shouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects ( b ) 10val a = Person ( "John" , "Doe" , 42
passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1public void passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {2 val actual = Person(1, "John", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))3 val expected = Person(1, "Jane", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))4 actual.shouldBeEquivalentTo(expected, excluding(Person::address))5}6public void passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsIgnoringNestedObjects() {7 val actual = Person(1, "John", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))8 val expected = Person(1, "Jane", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))9 actual.shouldBeEquivalentTo(expected, ignoring(Person::address))10}11public void passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsIncludingNestedObjects() {12 val actual = Person(1, "John", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))13 val expected = Person(1, "Jane", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))14 actual.shouldBeEquivalentTo(expected, including(Person::address))15}16public void passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsIncludingNestedObjectsWithCustomEquivalency() {17 val actual = Person(1, "John", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))18 val expected = Person(1, "Jane", "Doe", Address("1", "Main Street", "London", "England"))19 actual.shouldBeEquivalentTo(expected, including(Person::address, PersonAddressEquivalency))20}
passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1public void testPassShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {2 val person1 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 10)))3 val person2 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 20)))4 person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 excludingNestedObjects { it.name == "Fido" }5}6public void testPassShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {7 val person1 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 10)))8 val person2 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 20)))9 person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 excludingNestedObjects { it.name == "Fido" }10}11public void testPassShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {12 val person1 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 10)))13 val person2 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 20)))14 person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 excludingNestedObjects { it.name == "Fido" }15}16public void testPassShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {17 val person1 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 10)))18 val person2 = Person("John", "Doe", 30, listOf(Pet("Fido", 20)))19 person1 shouldBeEquivalentTo person2 excludingNestedObjects { it.name == "Fido" }20}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Unit and functional testing are the prime ways of verifying the JavaScript code quality. However, a host of tools are available that can also check code before or during its execution in order to test its quality and adherence to coding standards. With each tool having its unique features and advantages contributing to its testing capabilities, you can use the tool that best suits your need for performing JavaScript testing.
The key to successful test automation is to focus on tasks that maximize the return on investment (ROI), ensuring that you are automating the right tests and automating them in the right way. This is where test automation strategies come into play.
There are times when developers get stuck with a problem that has to do with version changes. Trying to run the code or test without upgrading the package can result in unexpected errors.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!