Best Kluent code snippet using org.amshove.kluent.tests.equivalency.ShouldBeEquivalentTo.failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
ShouldBeEquivalentTo.kt
Source: ShouldBeEquivalentTo.kt
...665 it.excludingNestedObjects()666 }667 }668 @Test669 fun failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {670 // arrange671 val team1 = Team("team1").apply {672 persons = listOf(673 Person("John", "Johnson").apply {674 address = Address("Mainzerlandstrasse", "200", "Frankfurt am Main", "60327", "Germany")675 },676 Person("Marc", "Marcson").apply { birthDate = LocalDate.of(2020, 2, 1) }677 )678 }679 val team2 = Team("team1").apply {680 persons = listOf(681 Person("John", "Johnson"),682 Person("Marc", "Marcson")683 )...
failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.amshove.kluent.`should not be equal to`2import org.amshove.kluent.`should not be equivalent to even if properties are different as excluding nested objects`3import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person4import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonWithAddress5import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonWithAddressAndPets6import org.junit.Test7class ShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjectsShould {8 fun passWhenComparingEquivalentObjects() {9 val person1 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))10 val person2 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))11 }12 fun failWhenComparingDifferentObjects() {13 val person1 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))14 val person2 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 13))15 }16 fun failWhenComparingDifferentObjectsWithDifferentProperties() {17 val person1 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))18 val person2 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 13))19 }20 fun failWhenComparingDifferentObjectsWithDifferentNestedProperties() {21 val person1 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))22 val person2 = PersonWithAddress("Name", 42, PersonWithAddressAndPets.Address("Street", 12))23 }24 fun failWhenComparingDifferentObjectsWithDifferentNestedObjects()
failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.amshove.kluent.shouldBeEquivalentTo2import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person3import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonDto4import org.junit.Test5class ShouldBeEquivalentTo {6 fun failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {7 val person = Person("John", "Doe")8 val personDto = PersonDto("John", "Doe")9 }10}11import org.amshove.kluent.shouldNotBeEquivalentTo12import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person13import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonDto14import org.junit.Test15class ShouldNotBeEquivalentTo {16 fun failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {17 val person = Person("John", "Doe")18 val personDto = PersonDto("John", "Doe")19 }20}21import org.amshove.kluent.shouldBeEquivalentTo22import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person23import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonDto24import org.junit.Test25class ShouldBeEquivalentTo {26 fun passShouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {27 val person = Person("John", "Doe")28 val personDto = PersonDto("John", "Doe")29 person shouldBeEquivalentTo personDto excluding listOf(Person::address)30 }31}32import org.amshove.kluent.shouldNotBeEquivalentTo33import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person34import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonDto35import org.junit.Test36class ShouldNotBeEquivalentTo {37 fun passShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects() {
failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1@DisplayName ( "failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects" ) @Test fun failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects () { val a = Person ( "John" , 25 , Address ( "Main Street" , 1 )) val b = Person ( "John" , 25 , Address ( "Main Street" , 2 )) shouldNotBeEquivalentTo b asExcludingNestedObjects a . address } }2Source code (failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects.kt line 19)31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 @DisplayName ( "failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects" ) @Test fun failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects () { val a = Person ( "John" , 25 , Address ( "Main Street" , 1 )) val b = Person ( "John" , 25 , Address ( "Main Street" , 2 )) shouldNotBeEquivalentTo b asExcludingNestedObjects a . address }4Successful tests 13 (100.00%)5Ignored tests 0 (0.00%)6Failing tests 0 (0.00%)
failShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects
Using AI Code Generation
1import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.Person2import org.amshove.kluent.tests.helpclasses.PersonWithAddress3import org.amshove.kluent.shouldBeEquivalentTo4import org.amshove.kluent.shouldNotBeEquivalentTo5import org.amshove.kluent.shouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects6import kotlin.test.Test7import kotlin.test.assertFails8class ShouldBeEquivalentToShouldNotBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjectsTests {9 fun passWhenComparingEquivalentObjects() {10 val person = Person("John", "Doe")11 val personWithAddress = PersonWithAddress("John", "Doe", "Street", 1)12 }13 fun failWhenComparingNonEquivalentObjects() {14 val person = Person("John", "Doe")15 val personWithAddress = PersonWithAddress("Jane", "Doe", "Street", 1)16 assertFails { person shouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects personWithAddress }17 }18 fun failWhenComparingObjectsWithSamePropertiesButDifferentTypes() {19 val person = Person("John", "Doe")20 val personWithAddress = PersonWithAddress("John", "Doe", "Street", 1)21 assertFails { person shouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects personWithAddress }22 }23 fun failWhenComparingEquivalentObjectsWithDifferentProperties() {24 val person = Person("John", "Doe")25 val personWithAddress = PersonWithAddress("Jane", "Doe", "Street", 1)26 assertFails { person shouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects personWithAddress }27 }28 fun failWhenComparingEquivalentObjectsWithDifferentPropertiesAndDifferentTypes() {29 val person = Person("John", "Doe")30 val personWithAddress = PersonWithAddress("Jane", "Doe", "Street", 1)31 assertFails { person shouldBeEquivalentToEvenIfPropertiesAreDifferentAsExcludingNestedObjects personWithAddress }32 }
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
In my last blog, I investigated both the stateless and the stateful class of model-based testing. Both have some advantages and disadvantages. You can use them for different types of systems, depending on whether a stateful solution is required or a stateless one is enough. However, a better solution is to use an aggregate technique that is appropriate for each system. Currently, the only aggregate solution is action-state testing, introduced in the book Paradigm Shift in Software Testing. This method is implemented in Harmony.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Unit and functional testing are the prime ways of verifying the JavaScript code quality. However, a host of tools are available that can also check code before or during its execution in order to test its quality and adherence to coding standards. With each tool having its unique features and advantages contributing to its testing capabilities, you can use the tool that best suits your need for performing JavaScript testing.
The key to successful test automation is to focus on tasks that maximize the return on investment (ROI), ensuring that you are automating the right tests and automating them in the right way. This is where test automation strategies come into play.
There are times when developers get stuck with a problem that has to do with version changes. Trying to run the code or test without upgrading the package can result in unexpected errors.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!