Best Kotest code snippet using com.sksamuel.kotest.engine.tags.TagExtensionTest.tags
TagExtensionTest.kt
Source: TagExtensionTest.kt
1package com.sksamuel.kotest.engine.tags2import io.kotest.core.Tag3import io.kotest.core.TagExpression4import io.kotest.core.config.ProjectConfiguration5import io.kotest.core.extensions.TagExtension6import io.kotest.core.spec.style.StringSpec7import io.kotest.engine.TestEngineLauncher8import io.kotest.engine.listener.CollectingTestEngineListener9import io.kotest.matchers.shouldBe10class TagExtensionTest : StringSpec() {11 init {12 "tag extensions should be used when calculating runtime tags" {13 val ext = object : TagExtension {14 override fun tags(): TagExpression =15 TagExpression(setOf(TagA), setOf(TagB))16 }17 val c = ProjectConfiguration().apply { registry.add(ext) }18 val collector = CollectingTestEngineListener()19 TestEngineLauncher(collector).withClasses(TestWithTags::class).withConfiguration(c).launch()20 collector.tests.mapKeys { it.key.name.testName }.mapValues { it.value.reasonOrNull } shouldBe21 mapOf(22 "should be tagged with tagA and therefore included" to null,23 "should be untagged and therefore excluded" to "Disabled by tags: (TagA) & (!TagB) & !SpecExcluded",24 "should be tagged with tagB and therefore excluded" to "Disabled by tags: (TagA) & (!TagB) & !SpecExcluded"25 )26 }27 }28}29object TagA : Tag()30object TagB : Tag()31private class TestWithTags : StringSpec() {32 init {33 "should be tagged with tagA and therefore included".config(tags = setOf(TagA)) { }34 "should be untagged and therefore excluded" { }35 "should be tagged with tagB and therefore excluded".config(tags = setOf(TagB)) { }36 }37}...
tags
Using AI Code Generation
1tags("tag1","tag2") {2"test1" {3}4}5tags("tag1","tag2") {6"test1" {7}8}9tags("tag1","tag2") {10"test1" {11}12}13tags("tag1","tag2") {14"test1" {15}16}17tags("tag1","tag2") {18"test1" {19}20}21tags("tag1","tag2") {22"test1" {23}24}25tags("tag1","tag2") {26"test1" {27}28}29tags("tag1","tag2") {30"test1" {31}32}33tags("tag1","tag2") {34"test1" {35}36}37tags("tag1","tag2") {38"test1" {39}40}41tags("tag1","tag2") {42"test1" {43}44}45tags("tag1","tag2") {46"test1" {47}48}49tags("tag1","tag2") {50"test1" {51}52}53tags("tag1","tag2") {54"test1" {55}56}
tags
Using AI Code Generation
1 fun testTags() {2 val spec = object : FunSpec() {3 init {4 tags(Windows, Linux)5 test("hello").config(tags = setOf(Windows, Linux)) {6 println("hello")7 }8 }9 }10 KotestEngineLauncher()11 .withSpec(spec)12 .withTags(Windows)13 .launch()14 .status()15 .shouldBe(KotestEngineLauncher.ExecutionStatus.Success)16 }17 fun testTags2() {18 val spec = object : FunSpec() {19 init {20 tags(Windows, Linux)21 test("hello").config(tags = setOf(Windows, Linux)) {22 println("hello")23 }24 }25 }26 KotestEngineLauncher()27 .withSpec(spec)28 .withTags(Windows, Linux)29 .launch()30 .status()31 .shouldBe(KotestEngineLauncher.ExecutionStatus.Success)32 }33 fun testTags3() {34 val spec = object : FunSpec() {35 init {36 tags(Windows, Linux)37 test("hello").config(tags = setOf(Windows, Linux)) {38 println("hello")39 }40 }41 }42 KotestEngineLauncher()43 .withSpec(spec)44 .withTags(Windows, Linux, Mac)45 .launch()46 .status()47 .shouldBe(KotestEngineLauncher.ExecutionStatus.Success)48 }49 fun testTags4() {50 val spec = object : FunSpec() {51 init {52 tags(Windows, Linux)53 test("hello").config(tags = setOf(Windows, Linux)) {54 println("hello")55 }56 }57 }58 KotestEngineLauncher()59 .withSpec(spec)60 .withTags(Windows, Linux, Mac, Ubuntu)
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
When most firms employed a waterfall development model, it was widely joked about in the industry that Google kept its products in beta forever. Google has been a pioneer in making the case for in-production testing. Traditionally, before a build could go live, a tester was responsible for testing all scenarios, both defined and extempore, in a testing environment. However, this concept is evolving on multiple fronts today. For example, the tester is no longer testing alone. Developers, designers, build engineers, other stakeholders, and end users, both inside and outside the product team, are testing the product and providing feedback.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
When working on web automation with Selenium, I encountered scenarios where I needed to refresh pages from time to time. When does this happen? One scenario is that I needed to refresh the page to check that the data I expected to see was still available even after refreshing. Another possibility is to clear form data without going through each input individually.
Sometimes, in our test code, we need to handle actions that apparently could not be done automatically. For example, some mouse actions such as context click, double click, drag and drop, mouse movements, and some special key down and key up actions. These specific actions could be crucial depending on the project context.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!