Best Ginkgo code snippet using types.CountOfFlakedSpecs
default_reporter.go
Source: default_reporter.go
...264 r.emit(r.f("{{cyan}}{{bold}}A BeforeSuite node failed so all tests were skipped.{{/}}\n"))265 } else {266 r.emit(r.f("{{green}}{{bold}}%d Passed{{/}} | ", specs.CountWithState(types.SpecStatePassed)))267 r.emit(r.f("{{red}}{{bold}}%d Failed{{/}} | ", specs.CountWithState(types.SpecStateFailureStates)))268 if specs.CountOfFlakedSpecs() > 0 {269 r.emit(r.f("{{light-yellow}}{{bold}}%d Flaked{{/}} | ", specs.CountOfFlakedSpecs()))270 }271 r.emit(r.f("{{yellow}}{{bold}}%d Pending{{/}} | ", specs.CountWithState(types.SpecStatePending)))272 r.emit(r.f("{{cyan}}{{bold}}%d Skipped{{/}}\n", specs.CountWithState(types.SpecStateSkipped)))273 }274}275/* Emitting to the writer */276func (r *DefaultReporter) emit(s string) {277 if len(s) > 0 {278 r.lastChar = s[len(s)-1:]279 r.lastEmissionWasDelimiter = false280 r.writer.Write([]byte(s))281 }282}283func (r *DefaultReporter) emitBlock(s string) {...
types_test.go
Source: types_test.go
...309 }310 Ω(reports.CountWithState(types.SpecStatePassed | types.SpecStatePending)).Should(Equal(3))311 })312 })313 Describe("CountOfFlakedSpecs", func() {314 It("returns the number of passing specs with NumAttempts > 1", func() {315 reports := types.SpecReports{316 {State: types.SpecStatePassed, NumAttempts: 2},317 {State: types.SpecStatePassed, NumAttempts: 2},318 {State: types.SpecStatePassed, NumAttempts: 1},319 {State: types.SpecStatePassed, NumAttempts: 1},320 {State: types.SpecStateFailed, NumAttempts: 2},321 }322 Ω(reports.CountOfFlakedSpecs()).Should(Equal(2))323 })324 })325 })326})...
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfFlakedSpecs())4}5import (6func main() {7 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfFailedSpecs())8}9import (10func main() {11 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfPassedSpecs())12}13import (14func main() {15 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfPendingSpecs())16}17import (18func main() {19 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfSpecs())20}21import (22func main() {23 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfSpecsFailedInLastRun())24}25import (26func main() {27 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfSpecsSkippedInLastRun())28}29import (30func main() {31 fmt.Println(gauge.CountOfSpecsThatHadFailures())32}33import (
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: true})4 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: true})5 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: false})6 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: false})7 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: false})8 types.Specs = append(types.Specs, &gauge_messages.ProtoSpec{IsFailed: true})9 fmt.Println(types.CountOfFlakedSpecs())10}
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import "fmt"2import "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/types"3func main() {4 count = types.CountOfFlakedSpecs()5 fmt.Println(count)6}
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 fmt.Println(specSummary.CountOfFlakedSpecs())4}5import (6func main() {7 fmt.Println(specSummary.Flaked())8}9import (10func main() {11 fmt.Println(specSummary.Failed())12}13import (14func main() {15 fmt.Println(specSummary.Passed())16}17import (18func main() {19 fmt.Println(specSummary.Skipped())20}21import (22func main() {23 fmt.Println(specSummary.Panicked())24}25import (26func main() {
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 testSpec := types.SpecSummary{NumberOfTotalSpecs: 5, NumberOfSkippedSpecs: 1, NumberOfPassedSpecs: 3, NumberOfFailedSpecs: 1}4 fmt.Println("Total no of specs: ", testSpec.NumberOfTotalSpecs)5 fmt.Println("Total no of skipped specs: ", testSpec.NumberOfSkippedSpecs)6 fmt.Println("Total no of passed specs: ", testSpec.NumberOfPassedSpecs)7 fmt.Println("Total no of failed specs: ", testSpec.NumberOfFailedSpecs)8 fmt.Println("Total no of flaked specs: ", testSpec.CountOfFlakedSpecs())9}
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 fmt.Println("Count of flaked specs: ", gauge.CountOfFlakedSpecs())4}5import (6func main() {7 fmt.Println("Count of failed scenarios: ", gauge.CountOfFailedScenarios())8}9import (10func main() {11 fmt.Println("Count of failed specs: ", gauge.CountOfFailedSpecs())12}13import (14func main() {15 fmt.Println("Count of passed scenarios: ", gauge.CountOfPassedScenarios())16}17import (18func main() {19 fmt.Println("Count of passed specs: ", gauge.CountOfPassedSpecs())20}21import (22func main() {23 fmt.Println("Count of pending scenarios: ", gauge.CountOfPendingScenarios())24}25import (
CountOfFlakedSpecs
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 fmt.Println(types.CountOfFlakedSpecs([]types.SpecResult{4 types.SpecResult{5 },6 types.SpecResult{7 },8 types.SpecResult{9 },10 types.SpecResult{11 },12 types.SpecResult{13 },14 types.SpecResult{15 },16 types.SpecResult{17 },18 types.SpecResult{19 },20 types.SpecResult{21 },22 }))23}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Estimates are critical if you want to be successful with projects. If you begin with a bad estimating approach, the project will almost certainly fail. To produce a much more promising estimate, direct each estimation-process issue toward a repeatable standard process. A smart approach reduces the degree of uncertainty. When dealing with presales phases, having the most precise estimation findings can assist you to deal with the project plan. This also helps the process to function more successfully, especially when faced with tight schedules and the danger of deviation.
The web paradigm has changed considerably over the last few years. Web 2.0, a term coined way back in 1999, was one of the pivotal moments in the history of the Internet. UGC (User Generated Content), ease of use, and interoperability for the end-users were the key pillars of Web 2.0. Consumers who were only consuming content up till now started creating different forms of content (e.g., text, audio, video, etc.).
Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Collecting and examining data from multiple sources can be a tedious process. The digital world is constantly evolving. To stay competitive in this fast-paced environment, businesses must frequently test their products and services. While it’s easy to collect raw data from multiple sources, it’s far more complex to interpret it properly.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!