Unlock 30% off on Manual Testing Annual Plans this Holiday Season.

Copied to Clipboard!

How to use GetStartVUs method of executor Package

Best K6 code snippet using executor.GetStartVUs

ramping_vus.go

Source:ramping_vus.go

...65	}66}67// Make sure we implement the lib.ExecutorConfig interface68var _ lib.ExecutorConfig = &RampingVUsConfig{}69// GetStartVUs is just a helper method that returns the scaled starting VUs.70func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) GetStartVUs(et *lib.ExecutionTuple) int64 {71	return et.ScaleInt64(vlvc.StartVUs.Int64)72}73// GetGracefulRampDown is just a helper method that returns the graceful74// ramp-down period as a standard Go time.Duration value...75func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) GetGracefulRampDown() time.Duration {76	return time.Duration(vlvc.GracefulRampDown.Duration)77}78// GetDescription returns a human-readable description of the executor options79func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) GetDescription(et *lib.ExecutionTuple) string {80	maxVUs := et.ScaleInt64(getStagesUnscaledMaxTarget(vlvc.StartVUs.Int64, vlvc.Stages))81	return fmt.Sprintf("Up to %d looping VUs for %s over %d stages%s",82		maxVUs, sumStagesDuration(vlvc.Stages), len(vlvc.Stages),83		vlvc.getBaseInfo(fmt.Sprintf("gracefulRampDown: %s", vlvc.GetGracefulRampDown())))84}85// Validate makes sure all options are configured and valid86func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) Validate() []error {87	errors := vlvc.BaseConfig.Validate()88	if vlvc.StartVUs.Int64 < 0 {89		errors = append(errors, fmt.Errorf("the number of start VUs shouldn't be negative"))90	}91	if getStagesUnscaledMaxTarget(vlvc.StartVUs.Int64, vlvc.Stages) <= 0 {92		errors = append(errors, fmt.Errorf("either startVUs or one of the stages' target value should be greater than 0"))93	}94	return append(errors, validateStages(vlvc.Stages)...)95}96// getRawExecutionSteps calculates and returns as execution steps the number of97// actively running VUs the executor should have at every moment.98//99// It doesn't take into account graceful ramp-downs. It also doesn't deal with100// the end-of-executor drop to 0 VUs, whether graceful or not. These are101// handled by GetExecutionRequirements(), which internally uses this method and102// reserveVUsForGracefulRampDowns().103//104// The zeroEnd argument tells the method if we should artificially add a step105// with 0 VUs at offset sum(stages.duration), i.e. when the executor is106// supposed to end.107//108// It's also important to note how scaling works. Say, we ramp up from 0 to 10109// VUs over 10 seconds and then back to 0, and we want to split the execution in110// 2 equal segments (i.e. execution segments "0:0.5" and "0.5:1"). The original111// execution steps would look something like this:112//113// VUs  ^114//    10|          *115//     9|         ***116//     8|        *****117//     7|       *******118//     6|      *********119//     5|     ***********120//     4|    *************121//     3|   ***************122//     2|  *****************123//     1| *******************124//     0------------------------> time(s)125//       01234567890123456789012   (t%10)126//       00000000001111111111222   (t/10)127//128// The chart for one of the execution segments would look like this:129//130// VUs  ^131//     5|         XXX132//     4|       XXXXXXX133//     3|     XXXXXXXXXXX134//     2|   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX135//     1| XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX136//     0------------------------> time(s)137//       01234567890123456789012   (t%10)138//       00000000001111111111222   (t/10)139//140// And the chart for the other execution segment would look like this:141//142// VUs  ^143//     5|          Y144//     4|        YYYYY145//     3|      YYYYYYYYY146//     2|    YYYYYYYYYYYYY147//     1|  YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY148//     0------------------------> time(s)149//       01234567890123456789012   (t%10)150//       00000000001111111111222   (t/10)151//152// Notice the time offsets and the slower ramping up and down. All of that is153// because the sum of the two execution segments has to produce exactly the154// original shape, as if the test ran on a single machine:155//156// VUs  ^157//    10|          Y158//     9|         XXX159//     8|        YYYYY160//     7|       XXXXXXX161//     6|      YYYYYYYYY162//     5|     XXXXXXXXXXX163//     4|    YYYYYYYYYYYYY164//     3|   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX165//     2|  YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY166//     1| XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX167//     0------------------------> time(s)168//       01234567890123456789012   (t%10)169//       00000000001111111111222   (t/10)170//171// More information: https://github.com/k6io/k6/issues/997#issuecomment-484416866172func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) getRawExecutionSteps(et *lib.ExecutionTuple, zeroEnd bool) []lib.ExecutionStep {173	var (174		timeTillEnd time.Duration175		fromVUs     = vlvc.StartVUs.Int64176		steps       = make([]lib.ExecutionStep, 0, vlvc.precalculateTheRequiredSteps(et, zeroEnd))177		index       = lib.NewSegmentedIndex(et)178	)179	// Reserve the scaled StartVUs at the beginning180	scaled, unscaled := index.GoTo(fromVUs)181	steps = append(steps, lib.ExecutionStep{TimeOffset: 0, PlannedVUs: uint64(scaled)})182	addStep := func(timeOffset time.Duration, plannedVUs uint64) {183		if steps[len(steps)-1].PlannedVUs != plannedVUs {184			steps = append(steps, lib.ExecutionStep{TimeOffset: timeOffset, PlannedVUs: plannedVUs})185		}186	}187	for _, stage := range vlvc.Stages {188		stageEndVUs := stage.Target.Int64189		stageDuration := time.Duration(stage.Duration.Duration)190		timeTillEnd += stageDuration191		stageVUDiff := stageEndVUs - fromVUs192		if stageVUDiff == 0 {193			continue194		}195		if stageDuration == 0 {196			scaled, unscaled = index.GoTo(stageEndVUs)197			addStep(timeTillEnd, uint64(scaled))198			fromVUs = stageEndVUs199			continue200		}201		// VU reservation for gracefully ramping down is handled as a202		// separate method: reserveVUsForGracefulRampDowns()203		if unscaled > stageEndVUs { // ramp down204			// here we don't want to emit for the equal to stageEndVUs as it doesn't go below it205			// it will just go to it206			for ; unscaled > stageEndVUs; scaled, unscaled = index.Prev() {207				addStep(208					// this is the time that we should go up 1 if we are ramping up209					// but we are ramping down so we should go 1 down, but because we want to not210					// stop VUs immediately we stop it on the next unscaled VU's time211					timeTillEnd-time.Duration(int64(stageDuration)*(stageEndVUs-unscaled+1)/stageVUDiff),212					uint64(scaled-1),213				)214			}215		} else {216			for ; unscaled <= stageEndVUs; scaled, unscaled = index.Next() {217				addStep(218					timeTillEnd-time.Duration(int64(stageDuration)*(stageEndVUs-unscaled)/stageVUDiff),219					uint64(scaled),220				)221			}222		}223		fromVUs = stageEndVUs224	}225	if zeroEnd && steps[len(steps)-1].PlannedVUs != 0 {226		// If the last PlannedVUs value wasn't 0, add a last step with 0227		steps = append(steps, lib.ExecutionStep{TimeOffset: timeTillEnd, PlannedVUs: 0})228	}229	return steps230}231func absInt64(a int64) int64 {232	if a < 0 {233		return -a234	}235	return a236}237func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) precalculateTheRequiredSteps(et *lib.ExecutionTuple, zeroEnd bool) int {238	p := et.ScaleInt64(vlvc.StartVUs.Int64)239	var result int64240	result++ // for the first one241	if zeroEnd {242		result++ // for the last one - this one can be more then needed243	}244	for _, stage := range vlvc.Stages {245		stageEndVUs := et.ScaleInt64(stage.Target.Int64)246		if stage.Duration.Duration == 0 {247			result++248		} else {249			result += absInt64(p - stageEndVUs)250		}251		p = stageEndVUs252	}253	return int(result)254}255// If the graceful ramp-downs are enabled, we need to reserve any VUs that may256// potentially have to finish running iterations when we're scaling their number257// down. This would prevent attempts from other executors to use them while the258// iterations are finishing up during their allotted gracefulRampDown periods.259//260// But we also need to be careful to not over-allocate more VUs than we actually261// need. We should never have more PlannedVUs than the max(startVUs,262// stage[n].target), even if we're quickly scaling VUs up and down multiple263// times, one after the other. In those cases, any previously reserved VUs264// finishing up interrupted iterations should be reused by the executor,265// instead of new ones being requested from the execution state.266//267// Here's an example with graceful ramp-down (i.e. "uninterruptible"268// iterations), where stars represent actively scheduled VUs and dots are used269// for VUs that are potentially finishing up iterations:270//271//272//      ^273//      |274// VUs 6|  *..............................275//     5| ***.......*..............................276//     4|*****.....***.....**..............................277//     3|******...*****...***..............................278//     2|*******.*******.****..............................279//     1|***********************..............................280//     0--------------------------------------------------------> time(s)281//       012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123   (t%10)282//       000000000011111111112222222222333333333344444444445555   (t/10)283//284// We start with 4 VUs, scale to 6, scale down to 1, scale up to 5, scale down285// to 1 again, scale up to 4, back to 1, and finally back down to 0. If our286// gracefulStop timeout was 30s (the default), then we'll stay with 6 PlannedVUs287// until t=32 in the test above, and the actual executor could run until t=52.288// See TestRampingVUsConfigExecutionPlanExample() for the above example289// as a unit test.290//291// The algorithm we use below to reserve VUs so that ramping-down VUs can finish292// their last iterations is pretty simple. It just traverses the raw execution293// steps and whenever there's a scaling down of VUs, it prevents the number of294// VUs from decreasing for the configured gracefulRampDown period.295//296// Finishing up the test, i.e. making sure we have a step with 0 VUs at time297// executorEndOffset, is not handled here. Instead GetExecutionRequirements()298// takes care of that. But to make its job easier, this method won't add any299// steps with an offset that's greater or equal to executorEndOffset.300func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) reserveVUsForGracefulRampDowns( //nolint:funlen301	rawSteps []lib.ExecutionStep, executorEndOffset time.Duration,302) []lib.ExecutionStep {303	rawStepsLen := len(rawSteps)304	gracefulRampDownPeriod := vlvc.GetGracefulRampDown()305	newSteps := []lib.ExecutionStep{}306	lastPlannedVUs := uint64(0)307	lastDownwardSlopeStepNum := 0308	for rawStepNum := 0; rawStepNum < rawStepsLen; rawStepNum++ {309		rawStep := rawSteps[rawStepNum]310		// Add the first step or any step where the number of planned VUs is311		// greater than the ones in the previous step. We don't need to worry312		// about reserving time for ramping-down VUs when the number of planned313		// VUs is growing. That's because the gracefulRampDown period is a fixed314		// value and any timeouts from early steps with fewer VUs will get315		// overshadowed by timeouts from latter steps with more VUs.316		if rawStepNum == 0 || rawStep.PlannedVUs > lastPlannedVUs {317			newSteps = append(newSteps, rawStep)318			lastPlannedVUs = rawStep.PlannedVUs319			continue320		}321		// We simply skip steps with the same number of planned VUs322		if rawStep.PlannedVUs == lastPlannedVUs {323			continue324		}325		// If we're here, we have a downward "slope" - the lastPlannedVUs are326		// more than the current rawStep's planned VUs. We're going to look327		// forward in time (up to gracefulRampDown) and inspect the rawSteps.328		// There are a 3 possibilities:329		//  - We find a new step within the gracefulRampDown period which has330		//    the same number of VUs or greater than lastPlannedVUs. Which331		//    means that we can just advance rawStepNum to that number and we332		//    don't need to worry about any of the raw steps in the middle!333		//    Both their planned VUs and their gracefulRampDown periods will334		//    be lower than what we're going to set from that new rawStep -335		//    we've basically found a new upward slope or equal value again.336		//  - We reach executorEndOffset, in which case we are done - we can't337		//    add any new steps, since those will be after the executor end338		//    offset.339		//  - We reach the end of the rawSteps, or we don't find any higher or340		//    equal steps to prevStep in the next gracefulRampDown period. So341		//    we'll simply add a new entry into newSteps with the values342		//    {timeOffsetWithTimeout, rawStep.PlannedVUs}, in which343		//    timeOffsetWithTimeout = (prevStep.TimeOffset + gracefulRampDown),344		//    after which we'll continue with traversing the following rawSteps.345		//346		//  In this last case, we can also keep track of the downward slope. We347		//  can save the last index we've seen, to optimize future lookaheads by348		//  starting them from the furhest downward slope step index we've seen so349		//  far. This can be done because the gracefulRampDown is constant, so350		//  when we're on a downward slope, raw steps will always fall in the351		//  gracefulRampDown "shadow" of their preceding steps on the slope.352		skippedToNewRawStep := false353		timeOffsetWithTimeout := rawStep.TimeOffset + gracefulRampDownPeriod354		advStepStart := rawStepNum + 1355		if lastDownwardSlopeStepNum > advStepStart {356			advStepStart = lastDownwardSlopeStepNum357		}358		wasRampingDown := true359		for advStepNum := advStepStart; advStepNum < rawStepsLen; advStepNum++ {360			advStep := rawSteps[advStepNum]361			if advStep.TimeOffset > timeOffsetWithTimeout {362				break363			}364			if advStep.PlannedVUs >= lastPlannedVUs {365				rawStepNum = advStepNum - 1366				skippedToNewRawStep = true367				break368			}369			if wasRampingDown {370				if rawSteps[advStepNum-1].PlannedVUs > advStep.PlannedVUs {371					// Still ramping down372					lastDownwardSlopeStepNum = advStepNum373				} else {374					// No longer ramping down375					wasRampingDown = false376				}377			}378		}379		// Nothing more to do here, found a new "slope" with equal or grater380		// PlannedVUs in the gracefulRampDownPeriod window, so we go to it.381		if skippedToNewRawStep {382			continue383		}384		// We've reached the absolute executor end offset, and we were already385		// on a downward "slope" (i.e. the previous planned VUs are more than386		// the current planned VUs), so nothing more we can do here.387		if timeOffsetWithTimeout >= executorEndOffset {388			break389		}390		newSteps = append(newSteps, lib.ExecutionStep{391			TimeOffset: timeOffsetWithTimeout,392			PlannedVUs: rawStep.PlannedVUs,393		})394		lastPlannedVUs = rawStep.PlannedVUs395	}396	return newSteps397}398// GetExecutionRequirements very dynamically reserves exactly the number of399// required VUs for this executor at every moment of the test.400//401// If gracefulRampDown is specified, it will also be taken into account, and the402// number of needed VUs to handle that will also be reserved. See the403// documentation of reserveVUsForGracefulRampDowns() for more details.404//405// On the other hand, gracefulStop is handled here. To facilitate it, we'll406// ensure that the last execution step will have 0 VUs and will be at time407// offset (sum(stages.Duration)+gracefulStop). Any steps that would've been408// added after it will be ignored. Thus:409//   - gracefulStop can be less than gracefulRampDown and can cut the graceful410//     ramp-down periods of the last VUs short.411//   - gracefulRampDown can be more than gracefulStop:412//     - If the user manually ramped down VUs at the end of the test (i.e. the413//       last stage's target is 0), then this will have no effect.414//     - If the last stage's target is more than 0, the VUs at the end of the415//       executor's life will have more time to finish their last iterations.416func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) GetExecutionRequirements(et *lib.ExecutionTuple) []lib.ExecutionStep {417	steps := vlvc.getRawExecutionSteps(et, false)418	executorEndOffset := sumStagesDuration(vlvc.Stages) + time.Duration(vlvc.GracefulStop.Duration)419	// Handle graceful ramp-downs, if we have them420	if vlvc.GracefulRampDown.Duration > 0 {421		steps = vlvc.reserveVUsForGracefulRampDowns(steps, executorEndOffset)422	}423	// If the last PlannedVUs value wasn't 0, add a last step with 0424	if steps[len(steps)-1].PlannedVUs != 0 {425		steps = append(steps, lib.ExecutionStep{TimeOffset: executorEndOffset, PlannedVUs: 0})426	}427	return steps428}429// NewExecutor creates a new RampingVUs executor430func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) NewExecutor(es *lib.ExecutionState, logger *logrus.Entry) (lib.Executor, error) {431	return RampingVUs{432		BaseExecutor: NewBaseExecutor(vlvc, es, logger),433		config:       vlvc,434	}, nil435}436// HasWork reports whether there is any work to be done for the given execution segment.437func (vlvc RampingVUsConfig) HasWork(et *lib.ExecutionTuple) bool {438	return lib.GetMaxPlannedVUs(vlvc.GetExecutionRequirements(et)) > 0439}440// RampingVUs handles the old "stages" execution configuration - it loops441// iterations with a variable number of VUs for the sum of all of the specified442// stages' duration.443type RampingVUs struct {444	*BaseExecutor445	config RampingVUsConfig446}447// Make sure we implement the lib.Executor interface.448var _ lib.Executor = &RampingVUs{}449// Run constantly loops through as many iterations as possible on a variable450// number of VUs for the specified stages.451//452// TODO: split up? since this does a ton of things, unfortunately I can't think453// of a less complex way to implement it (besides the old "increment by 100ms454// and see what happens)... :/ so maybe see how it can be split?455// nolint:funlen,gocognit,cyclop456func (vlv RampingVUs) Run(457	parentCtx context.Context, out chan<- stats.SampleContainer, _ *metrics.BuiltinMetrics,458) (err error) {459	rawExecutionSteps := vlv.config.getRawExecutionSteps(vlv.executionState.ExecutionTuple, true)460	regularDuration, isFinal := lib.GetEndOffset(rawExecutionSteps)461	if !isFinal {462		return fmt.Errorf("%s expected raw end offset at %s to be final", vlv.config.GetName(), regularDuration)463	}464	gracefulExecutionSteps := vlv.config.GetExecutionRequirements(vlv.executionState.ExecutionTuple)465	maxDuration, isFinal := lib.GetEndOffset(gracefulExecutionSteps)466	if !isFinal {467		return fmt.Errorf("%s expected graceful end offset at %s to be final", vlv.config.GetName(), maxDuration)468	}469	maxVUs := lib.GetMaxPlannedVUs(gracefulExecutionSteps)470	gracefulStop := maxDuration - regularDuration471	startTime, maxDurationCtx, regDurationCtx, cancel := getDurationContexts(parentCtx, regularDuration, gracefulStop)472	defer cancel()473	activeVUs := &sync.WaitGroup{}474	defer activeVUs.Wait()475	// Make sure the log and the progress bar have accurate information476	vlv.logger.WithFields(logrus.Fields{477		"type": vlv.config.GetType(), "startVUs": vlv.config.GetStartVUs(vlv.executionState.ExecutionTuple), "maxVUs": maxVUs,478		"duration": regularDuration, "numStages": len(vlv.config.Stages),479	},480	).Debug("Starting executor run...")481	activeVUsCount := new(int64)482	vusFmt := pb.GetFixedLengthIntFormat(int64(maxVUs))483	regularDurationStr := pb.GetFixedLengthDuration(regularDuration, regularDuration)484	progressFn := func() (float64, []string) {485		spent := time.Since(startTime)486		currentlyActiveVUs := atomic.LoadInt64(activeVUsCount)487		vus := fmt.Sprintf(vusFmt+"/"+vusFmt+" VUs", currentlyActiveVUs, maxVUs)488		if spent > regularDuration {489			return 1, []string{vus, regularDuration.String()}490		}491		progVUs := fmt.Sprintf(vusFmt+"/"+vusFmt+" VUs", currentlyActiveVUs, maxVUs)...

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func GetStartVUs() int {2  return executor.GetStartVUs()3}4func GetStartVUs() int {5  return executor.GetStartVUs()6}7func GetStartVUs() int {8  return executor.GetStartVUs()9}10func GetStartVUs() int {11  return executor.GetStartVUs()12}13func GetStartVUs() int {14  return executor.GetStartVUs()15}16func GetStartVUs() int {17  return executor.GetStartVUs()18}19func GetStartVUs() int {20  return executor.GetStartVUs()21}22func GetStartVUs() int {23  return executor.GetStartVUs()24}25func GetStartVUs() int {26  return executor.GetStartVUs()27}28func GetStartVUs() int {29  return executor.GetStartVUs()30}31func GetStartVUs() int {32  return executor.GetStartVUs()33}34func GetStartVUs() int {35  return executor.GetStartVUs()36}37func GetStartVUs() int {38  return executor.GetStartVUs()39}40func GetStartVUs() int {41  return executor.GetStartVUs()42}

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func main() {2    executor := GetStartVUs()3    fmt.Println(executor)4}5func main() {6    executor := GetStartVUs()7    fmt.Println(executor)8}9func main() {10    executor := GetStartVUs()11    fmt.Println(executor)12}13func main() {14    executor := GetStartVUs()15    fmt.Println(executor)16}17func main() {18    executor := GetStartVUs()19    fmt.Println(executor)20}21func main() {22    executor := GetStartVUs()23    fmt.Println(executor)24}25func main() {26    executor := GetStartVUs()27    fmt.Println(executor)28}29func main() {30    executor := GetStartVUs()31    fmt.Println(executor)32}33func main() {34    executor := GetStartVUs()35    fmt.Println(executor)36}37func main() {38    executor := GetStartVUs()39    fmt.Println(executor)40}41func main() {42    executor := GetStartVUs()43    fmt.Println(executor)44}45func main() {46    executor := GetStartVUs()47    fmt.Println(executor)48}49func main() {50    executor := GetStartVUs()51    fmt.Println(executor)52}

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func main() {2 executor := GetStartVUs()3 fmt.Println(executor)4}5func GetStartVUs() int {6}

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func main() {2    executor := &lib.Executor{}3    executor.GetStartVUs()4}5func main() {6    executor := lib.Executor{}7    executor.GetStartVUs()8}9func main() {10    executor := lib.Executor{}11    executor.GetStartVUs()12}13func main() {14    executor := lib.Executor{}15    executor.GetStartVUs()16}17func main() {18    executor := lib.Executor{}19    executor.GetStartVUs()20}21func main() {22    executor := lib.Executor{}23    executor.GetStartVUs()24}25func main() {26    executor := lib.Executor{}27    executor.GetStartVUs()28}29func main() {30    executor := lib.Executor{}31    executor.GetStartVUs()32}33func main() {34    executor := lib.Executor{}35    executor.GetStartVUs()36}37func main() {38    executor := lib.Executor{}39    executor.GetStartVUs()40}41func main() {42    executor := lib.Executor{}43    executor.GetStartVUs()44}45func main() {46    executor := lib.Executor{}47    executor.GetStartVUs()48}49func main() {50    executor := lib.Executor{}51    executor.GetStartVUs()52}53func main()

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func main() {2    executor := &rampingvus.Executor{}3    executor.GetStartVUs()4}5func main() {6    executor := &externallycontrolled.Executor{}7    executor.GetStartVUs()8}9func main() {10    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}11    executor.GetStartVUs()12}13func main() {14    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}15    executor.GetStartVUs()16}17func main() {18    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}19    executor.GetStartVUs()20}21func main() {22    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}23    executor.GetStartVUs()24}25func main() {26    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}27    executor.GetStartVUs()28}29func main() {30    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}31    executor.GetStartVUs()32}33func main() {34    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}35    executor.GetStartVUs()36}37func main() {38    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}39    executor.GetStartVUs()40}41func main() {42    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}43    executor.GetStartVUs()44}45func main() {46    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}47    executor.GetStartVUs()48}49func main() {50    executor := &sharediterations.Executor{}

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func GetStartVUs() int64 {2	return executor.GetStartVUs()3}4func (e *PerVUIterations) GetStartVUs() int64 {5}6func (e *PerVUIterations) GetStartVUs() int64 {7}8func (e *ConstantVUs) GetStartVUs() int64 {9}10func (e *SharedIterations) GetStartVUs() int64 {11}12func (e *ExternallyControlled) GetStartVUs() int64 {13}14func (e *RampingVUs) GetStartVUs() int64 {15}16func (e *RampingVUs) GetStartVUs() int64 {17}18func (e *ConstantArrivalRate) GetStartVUs() int64 {19}20func (e *VariableArrivalRate) GetStartVUs() int64 {21}22func (e *VariableLoopingVUs) GetStartVUs() int64 {23}24func (e *ConstantLoopingVUs) GetStartVUs

GetStartVUs

Using AI Code Generation

1func main() {2        executor := &lib.Executor{3                ExecutionTuple: lib.ExecutionTuple{4                },5                Config: lib.Config{6                        Duration: types.NullDurationFrom(10 * time.Second),7                        VUs:      null.IntFrom(10),8                },9        }10        executor.Init()11        fmt.Println(executor.GetStartVUs())12}13lib/executor.go:64:5: cannot use executor (type Executor) as type ExecutorConfig in argument to executor.GetStartVUs:14        Executor does not implement ExecutorConfig (GetStartVUs method has pointer receiver)15cannot use executor (type Executor) as type ExecutorConfig in argument to executor.GetStartVUs: Executor does not implement ExecutorConfig (GetStartVUs method has pointer receiver)

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.