Best Ginkgo code snippet using internal.runParallel
micro_test.go
Source: micro_test.go
1// Copyright 2020 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.2// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style3// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.4// This package contains microbenchmarks exercising specific areas of interest.5// The benchmarks here are not comprehensive and are not necessarily indicative6// real-world performance.7package micro_test8import (9 "testing"10 "google.golang.org/protobuf/internal/impl"11 "google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"12 "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoiface"13 "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/emptypb"14 micropb "google.golang.org/protobuf/internal/testprotos/benchmarks/micro"15 testpb "google.golang.org/protobuf/internal/testprotos/test"16)17// BenchmarkEmptyMessage tests a google.protobuf.Empty.18//19// It measures per-operation overhead.20func BenchmarkEmptyMessage(b *testing.B) {21 b.Run("Wire/Marshal", func(b *testing.B) {22 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {23 m := &emptypb.Empty{}24 for pb.Next() {25 if _, err := proto.Marshal(m); err != nil {26 b.Fatal(err)27 }28 }29 })30 })31 b.Run("Wire/Unmarshal", func(b *testing.B) {32 opts := proto.UnmarshalOptions{33 Merge: true,34 }35 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {36 m := &emptypb.Empty{}37 for pb.Next() {38 if err := opts.Unmarshal([]byte{}, m); err != nil {39 b.Fatal(err)40 }41 }42 })43 })44 b.Run("Wire/Validate", func(b *testing.B) {45 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {46 mt := (&emptypb.Empty{}).ProtoReflect().Type()47 for pb.Next() {48 _, got := impl.Validate(mt, protoiface.UnmarshalInput{})49 want := impl.ValidationValid50 if got != want {51 b.Fatalf("Validate = %v, want %v", got, want)52 }53 }54 })55 })56 b.Run("Clone", func(b *testing.B) {57 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {58 m := &emptypb.Empty{}59 for pb.Next() {60 proto.Clone(m)61 }62 })63 })64}65// BenchmarkRepeatedInt32 tests a message containing 500 non-packed repeated int32s.66//67// For unmarshal operations, it measures the cost of the field decode loop, since each68// item in the repeated field has an individual tag and value.69func BenchmarkRepeatedInt32(b *testing.B) {70 m := &testpb.TestAllTypes{}71 for i := int32(0); i < 500; i++ {72 m.RepeatedInt32 = append(m.RepeatedInt32, i)73 }74 w, err := proto.Marshal(m)75 if err != nil {76 b.Fatal(err)77 }78 b.Run("Wire/Marshal", func(b *testing.B) {79 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {80 for pb.Next() {81 if _, err := proto.Marshal(m); err != nil {82 b.Fatal(err)83 }84 }85 })86 })87 b.Run("Wire/Unmarshal", func(b *testing.B) {88 opts := proto.UnmarshalOptions{89 Merge: true,90 }91 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {92 m := &testpb.TestAllTypes{}93 for pb.Next() {94 m.RepeatedInt32 = m.RepeatedInt32[:0]95 if err := opts.Unmarshal(w, m); err != nil {96 b.Fatal(err)97 }98 }99 })100 })101 b.Run("Wire/Validate", func(b *testing.B) {102 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {103 mt := (&testpb.TestAllTypes{}).ProtoReflect().Type()104 for pb.Next() {105 _, got := impl.Validate(mt, protoiface.UnmarshalInput{106 Buf: w,107 })108 want := impl.ValidationValid109 if got != want {110 b.Fatalf("Validate = %v, want %v", got, want)111 }112 }113 })114 })115 b.Run("Clone", func(b *testing.B) {116 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {117 for pb.Next() {118 proto.Clone(m)119 }120 })121 })122}123// BenchmarkRequired tests a message containing a required field.124func BenchmarkRequired(b *testing.B) {125 m := µpb.SixteenRequired{126 F1: proto.Int32(1),127 F2: proto.Int32(1),128 F3: proto.Int32(1),129 F4: proto.Int32(1),130 F5: proto.Int32(1),131 F6: proto.Int32(1),132 F7: proto.Int32(1),133 F8: proto.Int32(1),134 F9: proto.Int32(1),135 F10: proto.Int32(1),136 F11: proto.Int32(1),137 F12: proto.Int32(1),138 F13: proto.Int32(1),139 F14: proto.Int32(1),140 F15: proto.Int32(1),141 F16: proto.Int32(1),142 }143 w, err := proto.Marshal(m)144 if err != nil {145 b.Fatal(err)146 }147 b.Run("Wire/Marshal", func(b *testing.B) {148 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {149 for pb.Next() {150 if _, err := proto.Marshal(m); err != nil {151 b.Fatal(err)152 }153 }154 })155 })156 b.Run("Wire/Unmarshal", func(b *testing.B) {157 opts := proto.UnmarshalOptions{158 Merge: true,159 }160 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {161 m := µpb.SixteenRequired{}162 for pb.Next() {163 if err := opts.Unmarshal(w, m); err != nil {164 b.Fatal(err)165 }166 }167 })168 })169 b.Run("Wire/Validate", func(b *testing.B) {170 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {171 mt := (µpb.SixteenRequired{}).ProtoReflect().Type()172 for pb.Next() {173 _, got := impl.Validate(mt, protoiface.UnmarshalInput{174 Buf: w,175 })176 want := impl.ValidationValid177 if got != want {178 b.Fatalf("Validate = %v, want %v", got, want)179 }180 }181 })182 })183 b.Run("Clone", func(b *testing.B) {184 b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {185 for pb.Next() {186 proto.Clone(m)187 }188 })189 })190}...
runParallel
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 parallel.RunParallel()4 fmt.Println("I am done")5}6import (7func main() {8 parallel.RunParallel()9 fmt.Println("I am done")10}
runParallel
Using AI Code Generation
1import "fmt"2func main() {3 fmt.Println("Hello, playground")4 r := runParallel{}5 r.runParallel(5)6}7import "fmt"8type runParallel struct {}9func (r *runParallel) runParallel(i int) {10 fmt.Println("Hello, playground")11}
runParallel
Using AI Code Generation
1import (2func main() {3 fmt.Println("main")4 var p = new(Parallel)5 p.runParallel()6}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
Estimates are critical if you want to be successful with projects. If you begin with a bad estimating approach, the project will almost certainly fail. To produce a much more promising estimate, direct each estimation-process issue toward a repeatable standard process. A smart approach reduces the degree of uncertainty. When dealing with presales phases, having the most precise estimation findings can assist you to deal with the project plan. This also helps the process to function more successfully, especially when faced with tight schedules and the danger of deviation.
The web paradigm has changed considerably over the last few years. Web 2.0, a term coined way back in 1999, was one of the pivotal moments in the history of the Internet. UGC (User Generated Content), ease of use, and interoperability for the end-users were the key pillars of Web 2.0. Consumers who were only consuming content up till now started creating different forms of content (e.g., text, audio, video, etc.).
Technical debt was originally defined as code restructuring, but in today’s fast-paced software delivery environment, it has evolved. Technical debt may be anything that the software development team puts off for later, such as ineffective code, unfixed defects, lacking unit tests, excessive manual tests, or missing automated tests. And, like financial debt, it is challenging to pay back.
Coaching is a term that is now being mentioned a lot more in the leadership space. Having grown successful teams I thought that I was well acquainted with this subject.
Collecting and examining data from multiple sources can be a tedious process. The digital world is constantly evolving. To stay competitive in this fast-paced environment, businesses must frequently test their products and services. While it’s easy to collect raw data from multiple sources, it’s far more complex to interpret it properly.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!